Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS100
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
87 Imaging
52 Features
65 Overall
57
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-250mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 312g - 111 x 65 x 44mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ100
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS200
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS100 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic ZS100, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and ZS100 (20MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and ZS100 (1") have different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VR-320 was announced 5 years earlier than the ZS100 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the VR-320 matches up versus the ZS100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS100 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Panasonic ZS100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic ZS100
VR-320 | ZS100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS100 over the Olympus VR-320
ZS100 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | July 2011 | More recent by 54 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic ZS100
VR-320 | ZS100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS100 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 has got exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS100 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 312 grams (0.69 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic ZS100 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-320 vs the ZS100.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and ZS100 is 94 and 87 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS100 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by looking through specifications. The graphic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and ZS100.
Plainly, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The VR-320 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Panasonic ZS100 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older VR-320 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS100 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ100 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2016-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.9 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 4K/UHD (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 @ 60p/60i/30p/24p, 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 312g (0.69 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 559 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $179 | $700 |