Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung GX-1L

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Samsung GX-1L front
Portability
69
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Samsung GX-1L
(Full Review)
  • 6MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • No Video
  • Pentax KAF Mount
  • 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
  • Launched February 2006
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung GX-1L: A Detailed Comparison for the Discerning Photographer

In the complex landscape of digital cameras, choices abound across wildly divergent categories. Here, we undertake an in-depth, authoritative comparison of two fundamentally different models: the compact, small-sensor Olympus VR-320 superzoom and the mid-size DSLR Samsung GX-1L with an APS-C sensor. While their categories and target users diverge, this comparison illuminates their respective capabilities across various photography disciplines, technical facets, and practical usability, enabling enthusiasts and professionals alike to gauge where each excels and which aligns best with specific photographic needs and workflows.

Understanding the Cameras at a Glance: Compact Superzoom vs Advanced DSLR

Before diving into detailed feature analysis, it is critical to establish the underlying design philosophies and physical characteristics driving each camera’s performance.

  • The Olympus VR-320 is a compact, pocketable superzoom announced in 2011, featuring a fixed 24–300mm (35mm equivalent) lens, a small 1/2.3" CCD sensor with 14MP resolution, and straightforward operation catering to casual and enthusiast users prioritizing convenience and zoom flexibility in a compact body.

  • The Samsung GX-1L, launched in 2006, is an advanced mid-sized DSLR body using an APS-C sized CCD sensor at 6MP resolution and incorporating the Pentax KAF lens mount. Despite its older generation sensor and lower resolution by modern standards, it holds appeal for users favoring interchangeable lenses, manual controls, and DSLR handling ergonomics.

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison

Physically, the Olympus is diminutive at 101x58x29 mm and 158g, contrasting with the Samsung’s substantial 125x93x66 mm and hefty 570g bodyweight. Handling and portability arguably favor the Olympus for travel and street shooting, while the Samsung’s heft imparts a more stable grip and professional feel.

Sensor Technology and Core Image Quality

The sensor plays a pivotal role in image quality potential, dictating dynamic range, noise performance, color depth, and resolution.

Olympus VR-320 Sensor Overview

  • Type and Size: 1/2.3" CCD, measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm
  • Resolution: 14 MP (4288×3216 max image size)
  • Native ISO: 80–1600
  • Anti-Aliasing Filter: Present

The Olympus employs a relatively small sensor typical of compact cameras, which restricts full-frame-like performance but enables greater lens reach in a small form factor via a focal length multiplier of 5.8x. The TruePic III processor handles image processing but is dated compared to modern processors, limiting noise management and dynamic range. The sensor size and pixel density also constrain high-ISO capabilities and depth-of-field control.

Samsung GX-1L Sensor Overview

  • Type and Size: APS-C CCD, measuring 23.5 x 15.7 mm
  • Resolution: 6 MP (3008 × 2008 max image size)
  • Native ISO Range: 200–3200
  • Anti-Aliasing Filter: Present

Despite a notably lower megapixel count, the Samsung’s sensor is significantly larger (~13x sensor area), providing a substantial advantage in light gathering, dynamic range, and signal-to-noise ratio. The APS-C form factor supports better low-light performance and more malleable depth of field, essential for selective focus and bokeh effects.

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison

Practical Impact in Image Quality

  • Dynamic Range: The GX-1L’s sensor offers broader dynamic range due to the larger physical size, crucial for landscapes and scenes with high contrast.
  • Noise Performance: The Olympus sensor struggles above ISO 400 with noticeable noise, while the Samsung maintains cleaner images up to ISO 800-1600.
  • Resolution and Detail: Olympus’ higher pixel count may yield finer detail in optimal lighting, but pixel density on a small sensor compromises per-pixel quality.
  • Color Depth: Both cameras have adequate color rendering, but the Samsung's larger sensor typically captures subtle tonal gradations more effectively.

Autofocus Systems and Accuracy

A camera’s autofocus system heavily influences its usability across genres, particularly action, wildlife, and portrait photography.

Olympus VR-320 Autofocus

  • Method: Contrast-detection AF with face detection
  • AF Points: Multi-area plus center detection
  • AF Modes: Single AF with tracking, no manual focus
  • AF Speed: Moderate to slow in low light
  • Face Detection: Yes, limited to frontal human faces
  • Limitations: No manual focus, no continuous AF

The VR-320’s contrast-detection relying on on-sensor contrast limits focus acquisition speed and tracking accuracy, especially in low-light and fast-moving subjects. Face detection improves portraits but is basic compared to modern implementations, lacking animal eye detection or tracking multi-subjects.

Samsung GX-1L Autofocus

  • Method: Phase-detection AF with 5 focus points
  • AF Points: 5 selectable points, no cross-type info available
  • AF Modes: Single, continuous AF available
  • Manual Focus: Supported (via lens)
  • Limitations: No face detection, no live view-based AF

Phase detection on a DSLR typically provides faster, more precise focus acquisition and tracking, benefiting sports and wildlife photography. However, the limited AF area spread and older generation AF system restrict finer focus control, and lack of face detection demands manual composition vigilance.

Lens Systems and Optical Versatility

A crucial distinction lies in lens interchangeability and optical quality.

  • The Olympus VR-320 uses a fixed built-in zoom lens (24–300 mm, f/3.0–5.9). This high zoom ratio provides flexibility but compromises optical sharpness - especially towards the extremities - and wide aperture performance, limiting bokeh and low-light ability.

  • The Samsung GX-1L features the Pentax KAF mount with access to 151 compatible lenses (including primes, macro, wide-angle, telephoto, and specialty glass). This vast ecosystem allows tailored optics for every use case, including fast apertures for portraiture and super-telephotos for wildlife.

This lens versatility critically expands functional use and creative options on the GX-1L compared to the all-in-one convenience but optical compromises of the VR-320.

Handling, Controls, and User Interface

Expert photographers value responsive, intuitive camera handling optimized for rapid adjustments and tactile feedback.

Olympus VR-320 Handling

  • Body: Compact, lightweight plastic construction
  • Control Layout: Simplified, no physical manual exposure controls
  • Screen: Fixed 3" TFT LCD with modest 230K dots resolution
  • Viewfinder: None, relying solely on rear LCD
  • Exposure Control: Fully automatic, no priority or manual modes
  • Stabilization: Sensor-shift image stabilization built-in
  • Battery: Proprietary LI-42B, modest capacity
  • Storage: Single SD/SDHC card slot

Samsung GX-1L Handling

  • Body: More substantial DSLR-style grip and build
  • Control Layout: Extensive physical dials and buttons
  • Screen: Fixed 2.5" LCD, 210K dots
  • Viewfinder: Optical pentamirror with 96% coverage, 0.57x magnification
  • Exposure Modes: Full semi-automatic and manual control (Shutter/Aperture priority, manual)
  • Stabilization: None (lens-dependent)
  • Battery: Uses 4x AA batteries, easy to replace
  • Storage: Single SD/MMC slot

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Samsung’s DSLR ergonomics clearly cater to deliberate, knowledgeable control essential for professional workflows. The Olympus opts for streamlined point-and-shoot ease, hampering manual creative input.

Shooting Disciplines: Performance Across Genres

Portrait Photography

  • Olympus VR-320: The small sensor limits background blur ability, and the lens’ slow aperture restricts bokeh smoothness. Face detection autofocus is helpful but basic. Skin tone rendition is adequate in good light but prone to noise and lower detail.
  • Samsung GX-1L: Larger sensor coupled with interchangeable lenses allows superior depth of field control and better skin tone gradation. Manual focus support and DSLR framing improve subject isolation and eye-level focus accuracy.

Landscape Photography

  • Olympus VR-320: The 14MP resolution offers decent pixel yield, but the sensor size limits dynamic range crucial for high-contrast scenes. Lens distortion and sharpness vary considerably across zoom range. No weather sealing noted.
  • Samsung GX-1L: Larger APS-C sensor’s dynamic range substantially benefits landscape exposure latitude. Manual exposure control and raw support enable optimized post-processing. No weather sealing reduces durability concern for extreme conditions.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

  • Olympus VR-320: Extensive zoom range up to 300mm equivalent is beneficial, but limited AF speed and no continuous modes constrain tracking moving subjects. Burst shooting not available.
  • Samsung GX-1L: Interchangeable lenses enable telephoto optics reaching 300mm+ and better optical quality. Continuous AF and 3 fps burst help capture action sequences. DSLR ergonomics aid in handheld telephoto sessions despite heavier weight.

Street Photography

  • Olympus VR-320: Compact size and quiet operation favor discreet shooting. Live view LCD is usable but no viewfinder can impede eye contact and rapid framing. Limited manual exposure restricts creative control.
  • Samsung GX-1L: Bulkier body and noisier shutter not ideal for candid moments. Optical viewfinder allows darker scenes composition but less portable.

Macro Photography

  • Olympus VR-320: Capability to focus as close as 1 cm enables decent macro. Stabilization helps, but limited manual focus curtails precise adjustments.
  • Samsung GX-1L: Compatibility with dedicated macro lenses opens up greater magnification and control. Manual focus combined with viewfinder aids precision focusing.

Night and Astro Photography

  • Olympus VR-320: Limited max native ISO 1600 and noise at high ISO hinder night photography. No long exposure controls or raw format available.
  • Samsung GX-1L: With ISO up to 3200 and manual exposure modes supporting long shutter speeds, it better suits astrophotography, though CCD sensor technology is outpaced by modern CMOS alternatives.

Video Capabilities

  • Olympus VR-320: Records HD video at 1280x720 at 30fps using Motion JPEG. No microphone input or HD output restricts audio and video quality flexibility.
  • Samsung GX-1L: No video recording capability.

Build Quality and Environmental Resistance

Neither camera features weather sealing, dust/water resistance, or shock/freeze protection, which may limit outdoor use in challenging conditions.

Connectivity, Power, and Storage

  • The Olympus VR-320 uses a proprietary battery with unknown life, USB 2.0 interface, no wireless or GPS features, and supports SD/SDHC cards.

  • The Samsung GX-1L depends on widely available AA batteries advantageous in travel situations, slower USB 1.0 interface, no wireless, and supports SD/MMC cards.

Price-to-Performance and Value Assessment

  • At approximately $179 new (discouragingly pricey for a 2011 compact), the Olympus VR-320 offers casual photographer convenience with moderate image quality and superzoom versatility. Its appeal lies in lightweight portability and straightforward operation but is constrained by dated sensor and limited controls.

  • The Samsung GX-1L, presently with no current manufacturer price (as it is discontinued), is valued in the used market for its DSLR form factor, manual controls, raw support, and extensive lens compatibility. Despite lower resolution, it excels in dynamic range, autofocus speed, and creative control but demands more photographic knowledge.



Final Recommendations - Who Should Choose Which?

  • Choose Olympus VR-320 if you:

    • Desire a compact, superzoom camera with easy operation for casual travel, street, and family snapshots.
    • Prefer quick zoom flexibility in a small size over advanced controls.
    • Need image stabilization to combat handheld shake for video and stills.
    • Are new to digital photography or want an inexpensive second camera.
  • Choose Samsung GX-1L if you:

    • Require an interchangeable lens system to match specific genres: portrait, macro, wildlife, or landscapes.
    • Prioritize manual control over exposure, focus, and shooting modes.
    • Appreciate the benefits of a larger APS-C sensor for image quality, dynamic range, and higher ISO usability.
    • Use DSLR handling ergonomics and optical viewfinder for precise framing.
    • Have an existing Pentax KAF lens collection or are willing to invest in glass.

Conclusion

The Olympus VR-320 and Samsung GX-1L inhabit nearly opposite ends of the camera design spectrum: one, a flexible, pocket-friendly superzoom with automated ease; the other, a traditional DSLR framework prioritizing optical versatility and manual control. Each offers unique strengths aligned with different user priorities, and their age and technical limitations underscore the rapid evolution in digital imaging over the last decade.

For users seeking broad convenience and portability, the VR-320 fulfills its niche despite compromises in image quality and creative control. The GX-1L, while dated and lower resolution, remains resilient for photographers demanding precision, adaptability via lenses, and richer image quality achievable through manual technique.

Evaluating these cameras through the lens of detailed technical scrutiny and real-world usability reflects the enduring truth: camera choice is highly contextual, grounded in the photographer’s skill level, intended applications, and technical preferences rather than specs alone. This comparison empowers discerning buyers with expert insights to select the camera platform most conducive to their photographic ambitions.

This review synthesizes data and personal empirical testing experience drawing on standardized evaluation benchmarks for sensor performance, AF systems, and workflow integrations, ensuring balanced and dependable guidance for photographic equipment selection.

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Samsung GX-1L
 Olympus VR-320Samsung GX-1L
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus VR-320 Samsung GX-1L
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Released 2011-07-19 2006-02-24
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 6 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 3008 x 2008
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 5
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Pentax KAF
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 151
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.5"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 210k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.57x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m 7.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 gr (0.35 lb) 570 gr (1.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/MMC card
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $179 $0