Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97879/9787910d485b9a778b65b87367d97ec165c2c757" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 front"
64 Imaging
48 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 638g - 133 x 95 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2006
- Previous Model is Konica Minolta 5D
- Successor is Sony A550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and A100 (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and A100 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The VR-320 was revealed 5 years after the A100 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A100 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the VR-320 scores vs the A100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A100. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Sony A100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony A100
VR-320 | A100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | July 2006 | Newer by 61 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Sony A100 over the Olympus VR-320
A100 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A100
VR-320 | A100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 comes with outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony A100 has dimensions of 133mm x 95mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.8") having a weight of 638 grams (1.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the VR-320 versus the A100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16507/16507612e88e269314184f22035e954f7a8f60aa" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and A100 is 94 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8a63/f8a63ee5a46526167ad5440a9cda4c1c337d2703" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The image underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and A100.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus VR-320 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent VR-320 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0bd8/c0bd877b960d3c912d193c376c118136033782c6" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f05c/2f05c09e44352b750612f011308cc16744ef953e" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A100 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2006-07-31 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lb) | 638g (1.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 133 x 95 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 61 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 476 |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-FM55H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $179 | $1,000 |