Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VR-320 was unveiled 2 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the VR-320 grades vs the T900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony T900
VR-320 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus VR-320
T900 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony T900
VR-320 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the VR-320 vs the T900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and T900 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out technical specs. The photograph here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and T900.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus VR-320 to provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger VR-320 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 143 grams (0.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $179 | $300 |