Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
30
Overall
33

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • New Model is Olympus VR-330
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Overview

In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The VR-320 was unveiled 2 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the VR-320 grades vs the T900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony T900

 VR-320 T900 
IntroducedJuly 2011February 2009Fresher by 30 months

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus VR-320

 T900 VR-320 
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen sizing3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution922k230kSharper screen (+692k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony T900

 VR-320 T900 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the VR-320 vs the T900.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and T900 is 94 and 96 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out technical specs. The photograph here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and T900.

As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus VR-320 to provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger VR-320 will have an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography features
Sony T900 Portrait photography features
33
MP count decent (14MP)
includes face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
27
has manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography info
Sony T900 Street photography info
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
57
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography features
Sony T900 Sports photography features
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
24
image stabilization (Optical)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000 seconds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography factors
Sony T900 Travel photography factors
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
52
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse recording
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography details
Sony T900 Landscape photography details
42
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
37
has manual focus
bigger than average screen (3.5 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Vlogging camera
Sony T900 as a Vlogging camera
32
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (158g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone jack
28
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sony T900
 Olympus VR-320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VR-320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Launched 2011-07-19 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-10.0
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3.5 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158 grams (0.35 lbs) 143 grams (0.32 lbs)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $179 $300