Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VR-320 was manufactured 6 months earlier than the TX200V and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the VR-320 matches up vs the TX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony TX200V
VR-320 | TX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus VR-320
TX200V | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony TX200V
VR-320 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | January 2012 | Similar age | |
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 provides physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has proportions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the VR-320 and the TX200V.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and TX200V is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and TX200V.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Sony TX200V to give you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 129 grams (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $179 | $500 |