Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front
Portability
96
Imaging
42
Features
48
Overall
44

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Sony TX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
  • Launched January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Overview

Here is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The VR-320 was manufactured 6 months earlier than the TX200V and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the VR-320 matches up vs the TX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony TX200V

 VR-320 TX200V 

Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus VR-320

 TX200V VR-320 
Screen size3.3"3"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kSharper screen (+1000k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony TX200V

 VR-320 TX200V 
LaunchedJuly 2011January 2012Similar age
Manual focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 provides physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has proportions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the VR-320 and the TX200V.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and TX200V is 94 and 96 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and TX200V.

To sum up, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Sony TX200V to give you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
Portrait photography with Sony TX200V
33
MP count decent (14MP)
has face detect focusing
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
36
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
supports face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VR-320
Street photography with Sony TX200V
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
68
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch focus
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography factors
Sony TX200V Sports photography factors
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
49
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
Travel photography with Sony TX200V
70
lighter than competition in class (158g)
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
71
environment sealing
comes with touch focus
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography advice
Sony TX200V Landscape photography advice
42
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
47
rather wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3.3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Vlogging camera
Sony TX200V as a Vlogging camera
32
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (158g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic support
35
rather wide (28mm)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
missing external mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sony TX200V
 Olympus VR-320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VR-320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Released 2011-07-19 2012-01-30
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III BIONZ
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4896 x 3672
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 80 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-4.8
Macro focus distance 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3.3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT Color LCD 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 2s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting speed - 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m 3.10 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 grams (0.35 lb) 129 grams (0.28 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 photos
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $179 $500