Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX1
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
90 Imaging
62 Features
48 Overall
56
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX1 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Olympus VR-330 and Sony QX1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Lens-style by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VR-330 was unveiled 4 years prior to the QX1 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the VR-330 scores vs the QX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-330 and Sony Alpha QX1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sony QX1
| VR-330 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus VR-330
| QX1 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | February 2011 | Fresher by 43 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sony QX1
| VR-330 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 has outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony QX1 has sizing of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus VR-330 and Sony QX1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the VR-330 vs the QX1.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and QX1 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and QX1.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VR-330 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony QX1 will provide you with more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older VR-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $220 | $500 |