Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
76
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Increase to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Released October 2015
  • Succeeded the Sony RX1R
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony RX1R II Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus VR-340 and Sony RX1R II, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the VR-340 (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) have totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The VR-340 was announced 4 years prior to the RX1R II and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the VR-340 grades against the RX1R II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Sony RX1R II

 VR-340 RX1R II 

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus VR-340

 RX1R II VR-340 
ReleasedOctober 2015January 2012More recent by 45 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1229k460kClearer display (+769k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Sony RX1R II

 VR-340 RX1R II 
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-340 provides exterior measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R II has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus VR-340 and Sony RX1R II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the VR-340 compared to the RX1R II.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the VR-340 and RX1R II is 96 and 78 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-340 and RX1R II.

Clearly, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The VR-340 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX1R II will resolve extra detail with its extra 26MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The older VR-340 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Portrait photography camera
34
MP count decent (16MP)
offers face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
85
has manual focus
above average flash sync (1/4,000s)
high resolution (42 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
comes with face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Street photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Street photography camera
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (125 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
73
has a tilting screen
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
very good ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than average (507g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Sports photography camera
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
63
high resolution (42MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
comes with tracking autofocus
supports phase detect AF
can't change focal length (35mm)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
not so great battery (220 CIPA)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Travel photography info
Sony RX1R II Travel photography info
69
lighter than competition (125g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
59
high resolution (42MP)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
missing Timelapse mode
not so great battery (220 CIPA)
more heavy than average (507g)
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Landscape photography camera
43
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
68
has manual focus
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
high resolution (42 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
doesnt have low pass filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
lack of image stabilization
not so great battery (220 CIPA)
missing Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Vlogging highlights
Sony RX1R II Vlogging highlights
33
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
lighter than competition (125g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone jack
34
very good max aperture (f2.0)
comes with face detection focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with external microphone port
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than average (507 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus VR-340Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VR-340 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-01-10 2015-10-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 42 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 7952 x 5304
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Highest boosted ISO - 102400
Minimum native ISO 100 50
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 35mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.7 f/2.0
Macro focusing range - 14cm
Crop factor 5.8 1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 460k dot 1,229k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.80 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lb) 507 gr (1.12 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 97
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.9
DXO Low light rating not tested 3204
Other
Battery life - 220 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-50B NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $130 $3,300