Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- Successor is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony A200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the A200 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and A200 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The XZ-1 was launched 2 years after the A200 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the XZ-1 grades versus the A200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony A200
XZ-1 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | ![]() | July 2008 | More modern by 31 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus XZ-1
A200 | XZ-1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony A200
XZ-1 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 offers external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Sony A200 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony A200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-1 vs the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b64f3/b64f3e2aee98c5a2fd04c66ab8c66082f30c3130" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and A200 is 88 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d820d/d820dbded30a275b9dc472dca17500746d5f06df" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and A200.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 features the smaller sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field more difficult. The newer XZ-1 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f034/6f034c824060fd07d7e0aaa49212758d12b2eb79" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53b39/53b39ca21ec9b26aab96d512ebad79969a4a160b" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2011-01-26 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) | 572 gr (1.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 34 | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | 117 | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $567 | $100 |