Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
54
Overall
54

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2011
Sony A390
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Launched July 2010
  • Superseded the Sony A380
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Overview

The following is a complete analysis of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and A390 (14MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and A390 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The XZ-1 was unveiled 7 months after the A390 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the XZ-1 grades versus the A390 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony A390

 XZ-1 A390 
LaunchedJanuary 2011July 2010Newer by 7 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution614k230kClearer screen (+384k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus XZ-1

 A390 XZ-1 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony A390

 XZ-1 A390 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 features physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony A390 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-1 vs the A390.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and A390 is 88 and 66 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and A390.

As you can see, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A390 will give you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern XZ-1 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography factors
Sony A390 Portrait photography factors
45
focusing manually
features face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
72
focusing manually
good resolution (14 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-1
Street photography with Sony A390
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
heavier than competitors in class (275 grams)
76
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography highlights
Sony A390 Sports photography highlights
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking autofocus
good battery (320 shots)
low fps (2.0 fps)
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
lack of phase detect autofocus
60
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (14MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect autofocus
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
not so great battery life (230 per charge)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A390 as a Travel photography camera
62
good battery (320 CIPA)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors in class (275 grams)
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
53
good resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
not so great battery life (230 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography features
Sony A390 Landscape photography features
54
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
good battery (320 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
lack of Time Lapse recording
61
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
small screen (2.7 inch)
not so great battery life (230 per charge)
no Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging highlights
Sony A390 Vlogging highlights
31
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic support
heavier than competitors in class (275 grams)
9
lack of video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Sony A390
 Olympus XZ-1Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus XZ-1 Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2011-01-26 2010-07-28
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic V Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.63" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 8.07 x 5.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 44.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3664 x 2752 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Crop factor 4.5 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 614 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 275 grams (0.61 lbs) 549 grams (1.21 lbs)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 34 66
DXO Color Depth score 18.8 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 11.5
DXO Low light score 117 607
Other
Battery life 320 photos 230 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots One One
Price at release $567 $500