Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched July 2010
- Superseded the Sony A380
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and A390 (14MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and A390 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-1 was unveiled 7 months after the A390 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the XZ-1 grades versus the A390 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony A390
XZ-1 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | July 2010 | Newer by 7 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus XZ-1
A390 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony A390
XZ-1 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 features physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony A390 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-1 vs the A390.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and A390 is 88 and 66 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and A390.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A390 will give you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern XZ-1 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2011-01-26 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lbs) | 549 grams (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 34 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | 117 | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 230 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $567 | $500 |