Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbbce/fbbcef1a206577b4ac051e84289a628a2f2db4ba" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-3 front Sony Alpha NEX-3 front"
89 Imaging
54 Features
55 Overall
54
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched June 2010
- Replacement is Sony NEX-C3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony NEX-3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and NEX-3 (14MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and NEX-3 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The XZ-1 was released 8 months later than the NEX-3 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the XZ-1 grades versus the NEX-3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Alpha NEX-3. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony NEX-3
XZ-1 | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus XZ-1
NEX-3 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 614k | Crisper display (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony NEX-3
XZ-1 | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 enjoys outside measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3 has proportions of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony NEX-3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-1 against the NEX-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e92a2/e92a2af87d59ebf76daaeadc735f84fff550c300" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and NEX-3 is 88 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adb12/adb120ac1f5008fbb246c6808be8af331dc48af1" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and NEX-3.
To sum up, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony NEX-3 will show extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher XZ-1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cabd/8cabd578537bd2ec6a5fdd5f4b13e7d1ca06dab8" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/320f0/320f08f2ce742392421609fe398d26fae2949e1a" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-01-26 | 2010-06-07 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | OLED | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 grams (0.61 pounds) | 297 grams (0.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 34 | 68 |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 12.0 |
DXO Low light score | 117 | 830 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 330 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $567 | $0 |