Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88bb5/88bb5d6cdc2c05845f07f48bf0fd556e603fdf8e" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 front"
95 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 141g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FP5, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FP5 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FP5 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was released 24 months later than the FP5 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the FP5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FP5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FP5
XZ-2 iHS | FP5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 24 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP5 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FP5 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FP5
XZ-2 iHS | FP5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FP5 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FP5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the FP5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c4fa/0c4fa88bd3bef433d38d64a674852b376abd924a" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and FP5 is 85 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c35e/2c35ef87071356829dcf055d39e5f150ac1b000c" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and FP5.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FP5 will give more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80a5f/80a5fffc440eeb68fb78b6040c83d12fd665cad5" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c0fc/3c0fc81070ac5669253709ad1eb954fd143cc770" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP5 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 141g (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 260 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $450 | $199 |