Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5323/b5323da51a1eb065d4b96f694e69df873d45a47c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 139g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FS7, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FS7 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FS7 (1/2.5") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 3 years later than the FS7 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS7 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the FS7 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FS7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FS7
XZ-2 iHS | FS7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS7 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FS7 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FS7
XZ-2 iHS | FS7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Panasonic FS7 has dimensions of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 139 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FS7 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the FS7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d59f/3d59fc29a7642d6024580115b2dbffe07ee18d2f" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and FS7 is 85 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2529/f2529c2daeac38b16e6a6633199f2207be83b842" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out specifications. The visual below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and FS7.
To sum up, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will produce greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS will have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02526/02526280c18a41093a0d666f6af45064b071375b" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0c10/c0c108786ded0d5af9caed44adf4527a0f5879cc" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS7 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2009-01-16 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 139 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $450 | $160 |