Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS7
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 218g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched July 2011
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ10
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS8
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS7 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS7, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the ZS7 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and ZS7 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 18 months after the ZS7 making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the ZS7 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS7 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZS7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic ZS7
| XZ-2 iHS | ZS7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 18 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS7 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| ZS7 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS7
| XZ-2 iHS | ZS7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS7 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS7 has proportions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS7 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the ZS7.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and ZS7 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS7 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The pic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and ZS7.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses the exact same resolution but not the same sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS contains the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The newer XZ-2 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS7 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS7 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 |
| Other name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $450 | $350 |