Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WS80
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WS80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.8-4.7) lens
- 125g - 92 x 60 x 22mm
- Revealed August 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WS80 Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax WS80, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the WS80 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WS80 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 3 years after the WS80 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the WS80 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WS80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax Optio WS80. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax WS80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax WS80
| XZ-2 iHS | WS80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 42 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WS80 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WS80 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax WS80
| XZ-2 iHS | WS80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WS80 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Pentax WS80 has dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax WS80 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the WS80.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and WS80 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WS80 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and WS80.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will give extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern XZ-2 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WS80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WS80 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio WS80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio WS80 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-08-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Prime |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.8-4.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 125g (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 92 x 60 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $450 | $220 |