Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1S, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and GX-1S (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was brought out 7 years after the GX-1S which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the GX-1S when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1S. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung GX-1S
XZ-2 iHS | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | January 2006 | More modern by 85 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 210k | Clearer screen (+710k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
GX-1S | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1S
XZ-2 iHS | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1S has dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1S in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the GX-1S.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and GX-1S is 85 and 68 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and GX-1S.
Clearly, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung GX-1S |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2006-01-16 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 605 gr (1.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $450 | $850 |