Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Samsung GX-1S front
Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Released December 2012
Samsung GX-1S
(Full Review)
  • 6MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • No Video
  • Pentax KAF Mount
  • 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
  • Announced January 2006
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Overview

Following is a in depth review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1S, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and GX-1S (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The XZ-2 iHS was brought out 7 years after the GX-1S which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the GX-1S when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung GX-1S

 XZ-2 iHS GX-1S 
AnnouncedDecember 2012January 2006More modern by 85 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k210kClearer screen (+710k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 GX-1S XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1S

 XZ-2 iHS GX-1S 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1S has dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1S in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the GX-1S.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and GX-1S is 85 and 68 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and GX-1S.

Clearly, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung GX-1S as a Portrait photography camera
46
manual focus
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
50
focusing manually
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no liveview
low resolution (6MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography information
Samsung GX-1S Street photography information
66
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
small sensor (1/1.7")
heavier than competitors in class (346 grams)
60
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lighter than others in class (605g)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
Samsung GX-1S as a Sports photography camera
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
great battery (340 shots)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
38
decent sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (6MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Travel photography with Samsung GX-1S
61
great battery (340 CIPA)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (346 grams)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
52
lighter than others in class (605 grams)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
low resolution (6 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Landscape photography with Samsung GX-1S
55
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
great battery (340 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
missing Time Lapse function
46
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Pentax KAF mount)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (6 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
Samsung GX-1S as a Vlogging camera
36
fairly wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has mic socket
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
heavier than competitors in class (346 grams)
9
no video recording
Photography Glossary

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1S
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSamsung GX-1S
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Samsung GX-1S
Class Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Released 2012-12-18 2006-01-16
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 6 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 3008 x 2008
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 35 11
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Pentax KAF
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) -
Largest aperture f/1.8-2.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Available lenses - 151
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.5 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 210 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346 gr (0.76 lb) 605 gr (1.33 lb)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-90B 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC card
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $450 $850