Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A99 II
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
57 Imaging
77 Features
92 Overall
83
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Sony A99
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A99 II Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A99 II, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and A99 II (Full frame) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 4 years before the A99 II which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the A99 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A99 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha A99 II. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony A99 II
XZ-2 iHS | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A99 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | December 2012 | More modern by 45 months | |
Display type | Fully articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 920k | Clearer display (+309k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony A99 II
XZ-2 iHS | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony A99 II has measurements of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") having a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A99 II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the A99 II.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and A99 II is 85 and 57 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and A99 II.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A99 II will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 30 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 42 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 399 |
Cross focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fully articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 849g (1.87 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | 92 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 13.4 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 490 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Retail cost | $450 | $3,198 |