Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX99
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Introduced September 2018

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX99 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX99, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) offer different sensor sizing.

The XZ-2 iHS was introduced 6 years earlier than the HX99 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up vs the HX99 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX99 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony HX99
XZ-2 iHS | HX99 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
HX99 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | ![]() | December 2012 | More recent by 69 months |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX99
XZ-2 iHS | HX99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3.00" | Same display measurement |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony HX99 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") with a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX99 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the HX99.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and HX99 is 85 and 91 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and HX99.
Clearly, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Sony HX99 will result in greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX99 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2018-09-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3-inch |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.00" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 638k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 242 gr (0.53 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 360 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $450 | $469 |