Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 II
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
58 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Replaced the Sony RX10
- New Model is Sony RX10 III
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony RX10 II, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and RX10 II (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and RX10 II (1") come with totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 3 years earlier than the RX10 II which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the RX10 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony RX10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony RX10 II
XZ-2 iHS | RX10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
RX10 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2015 | December 2012 | More modern by 30 months | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 920k | Clearer screen (+309k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony RX10 II
XZ-2 iHS | RX10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony RX10 II has specifications of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") accompanied by a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony RX10 II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the RX10 II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and RX10 II is 85 and 58 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by seeing specs. The image underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and RX10 II.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony RX10 II will produce more detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2015-06-10 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 813g (1.79 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 400 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $450 | $998 |