Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Revealed March 2016
- Earlier Model is Sony RX10 II
- Later Model is Sony RX10 IV
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony RX10 III, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and RX10 III (1") come with different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was released 4 years earlier than the RX10 III and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the RX10 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony RX10 III
XZ-2 iHS | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
RX10 III | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2016 | December 2012 | More recent by 39 months | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 920k | Crisper screen (+309k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony RX10 III
XZ-2 iHS | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") and a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Sony RX10 III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the RX10 III.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and RX10 III is 85 and 53 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by reading specs. The visual here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and RX10 III.
All in all, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX10 III will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 14.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 1051 grams (2.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 420 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $450 | $1,398 |