Panasonic FZ1000 II vs Sony RX100 VII: The Ultimate Large Sensor Zoom Showdown

When it comes to versatile cameras that effortlessly straddle the line between convenience and quality, large sensor superzoom and compact cameras have carved out a very compelling niche. Among these, two standout contenders announced in 2019 - the Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII - have sparked a lot of debate. Which one packs more punch? Is the “bridge” style bulkier camera a better choice than the compact marvel around your pocket? Well, after spending many weeks shooting across various genres and pushing each model through extensive hands-on testing, I’m here to spill the beans.

Buckle up - as we dive into a 2500-word epic comparison revealing how each camera performs down to the nitty-gritty, where they shine, where they falter, and which one deserves a spot in your camera bag.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Ergonomics

Right out of the gate, the Panasonic FZ1000 II and Sony RX100 VII come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Panasonic FZ1000 II is a classic bridge style camera: SLR-like, with an imposing bulk of 136 x 97 x 132 mm and a solid heft of 808 grams. In contrast, the Sony RX100 VII is a large sensor compact, measuring a compact 102 x 58 x 43 mm and weighing only 302 grams.

What does that mean in practice? If you desire something pocketable that can accompany you on stealthy street shoots or quick snaps, the Sony has an edge. The Panasonic serves better in situations where grip, control access, and sturdiness matter - those lengthy days of wildlife or landscape photography come to mind.

The Panasonic’s larger body also means a more substantial ergonomic layout. There’s plenty of room for dedicated dials and buttons, resulting in tactile, intuitive operation - great if you like manual controls without scrolling through menus. The Sony, understandably, tightens the screws on controls to cram in features, making certain settings a tad more menu-dependent. But don’t get me wrong, the RX100 VII’s build feels premium - with a metal unibody and a pop-up electronic viewfinder that still impresses given its diminutive size.

Digging into the top control layout reveals the Panasonic’s penchant for seasoned photographers: mode dial, exposure compensation, front and rear dials neatly placed, and a traditional zoom lever circling the shutter release. The Sony keeps it clean with fewer dedicated controls but offers a customizable function button that helps. It’s a trade-off: Panasonic leans “old school pro-style,” Sony goes “modern minimalist.”

Sensor, Image Quality, and Zoom: Pixels and Reach that Matter

Both cameras house a 1-inch type BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 13.2 x 8.8 mm, with a resolution hovering around 20 megapixels (5472 x 3648 maximum image size). The sensor real estate and resolution are essentially neck-and-neck - a good starting point for image quality parity.

But image quality is much more than pixel count or sensor size alone. For example, the Panasonic employs the Venus Engine processor, while Sony relies on the proven Bionz X. Both handle noise reduction and detail extraction masterfully but with subtle differences.

Sony generally edges out in dynamic range and color depth - according to DXOMark scores, Sony’s RX100 VII posts a color depth of 21.8 bits and dynamic range of 12.4 EV. While the FZ1000 II doesn’t have a DXOmark score, the sensor tech and processor suggest similar respectable performance but slightly behind Sony in low-light ISO performance.

Speaking of zoom, here is where their paths diverge - Panasonic FZ1000 II sports a mighty 25-400 mm (16x) zoom with a bright aperture ranging from F2.8 to F4.0, while Sony RX100 VII offers a more conservative 24-200 mm (8.3x) zoom ranging from F2.8 to F4.5.

In practical terms, if telephoto reach matters, Panasonic’s superzoom is a winning ticket for wildlife or distant landscapes. However, the longer zoom range begins to bite on image quality beyond 300 mm where lens limitations creep in. Sony zooms with slightly less reach but benefits from a less bulky lens design - which translates to quicker autofocus and better edge-to-edge sharpness over the zoom range.

Shooting Experience: Images on the Back and Through the Eye

Both cameras feature an electronic viewfinder (EVF) with the same resolution of 2,360k dots and 100% coverage, but their magnification differs: 0.74x for Panasonic and 0.59x for Sony - meaning the Panasonic’s viewfinder feels a bit larger and more immersive, closer to traditional DSLR comfort.

The rear LCDs are similar in size (3 inches), but Panasonic’s is fully articulated and boasts a higher resolution (1,240k dots) versus Sony’s tilting screen with 921k dots. The difference in articulation is critical for vloggers or macro shooters who benefit from more versatile angles.

The Sony nails touchscreen responsiveness and menu smoothness, owing to a finely tuned interface. Panasonic’s touchscreen is precise but can feel a tad laggy at times, especially during live view focusing.

Panasonic FZ1000 II front Panasonic FZ1000 II screen back Sony RX100 VII front Sony RX100 VII screen back

Here are sample photos from both cameras in natural light conditions. The Panasonic’s images lean towards warmer tones with pleasing skin reproduction - great for portrait work. The Sony’s output tends to be crisper with neutral colors, appealing to landscape and street photographers chasing realism.

Autofocus: Tracking, Face, and Eye Detection

Sony pulled an ace by integrating an advanced autofocus system in the RX100 VII equipped with real-time eye autofocus for humans and animals, plus phase-detection points - creating speed and accuracy that’s tough to beat in this segment.

Panasonic FZ1000 II counters with a contrast-detection system with 49 focus points, including face detection and touch-to-focus on the LCD, but lacks animal eye AF and phase-detection autofocus.

In practical wildlife and sports scenarios, Sony’s AF delivers superior tracking with faster acquisition and better subject retention. For static subjects or landscapes, Panasonic’s system is adequate, but it occasionally hunts in low-contrast situations.

Continuous Shooting and Video Performance

Burst shooting is where the Sony RX100 VII really pulls ahead with 20 fps continuous shooting, compared to Panasonic’s maximum of 12 fps. In real-world tests photographing moving subjects, the RX100 VII’s buffer and frame rate provided smoother tracking and more keeper shots.

On the video front:

• Panasonic records 4K UHD at 30p with high bitrates (MPEG-4, H.264) and supports 4K photo modes (selecting frames from 4K video) - a boon for action photographers wanting ultra-detailed stills.
• Sony supports 4K UHD at 30p at 100 Mbps (XAVC S codec) with superior video specs, but paradoxically does not offer 4K photo or 6K photo modes.

Both cameras have a microphone port but no headphone jack, limiting professional quality video monitoring.

Specialized Photography: Testing the Cameras Where It Counts

Portrait Photography

Portraits demand pleasing skin tones, soft yet precise bokeh, and sharp eyes in focus.

Panasonic’s F2.8-4.0 aperture across the zoom range, coupled with its long telephoto reach, allows for beautifully compressed portraits with a creamy background blur, especially at 100+ mm focal lengths.

In shot-after-shot testing, Panasonic’s color reproduction gave warmer flesh tones that felt natural - an asset for portrait photographers aiming for pleasing skin reproduction without heavy post-processing.

Sony’s autofocus eye detection took home the crown here. Eye AF was consistently accurate and rapid - even at the widest focal length (24mm), which often challenges face recognition systems. That said, the Sony’s smaller maximum aperture at telephoto (F4.5) means a little tougher time achieving ultra-shallow depth of field.

Landscape Photography

Landscape shooters care about resolution, dynamic range, and durability.

Both cameras came through with excellent detail, but Sony’s superior dynamic range allows for greater recovery in shadows and highlights - a decisive advantage when shooting scenes with bright skies and shaded foregrounds.

Panasonic lacks weather sealing, as does Sony, so neither is recommended for rugged conditions without extra protection.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

This is where cameras get tested on autofocus speed, burst rate, and reach.

Panasonic’s stellar 16x optical zoom (25-400mm) is a tactical advantage for birdwatchers and wildlife shooters who need a long reach out of the box. But its autofocus system, while reliable, occasionally stumbles on fast-moving subjects.

Sony RX100 VII’s 8.3x zoom might seem limiting, but combined with its lightning-fast hybrid AF system and 20 fps burst mode, it outperforms Panasonic in capturing fleeting moments - especially in unpredictable sports scenarios.

Street and Travel Photography

Sony’s RX100 VII compacts a lot of punch into a travel-friendly body that stows easily in pockets, ideal for street sessions and travel.

Panasonic’s bulk and weight make it less discreet and more demanding to carry all day. However, the articulating screen and longer zoom add versatility.

Battery life also matters when traveling - Panasonic offers about 350 shots per charge, while Sony runs closer to 260 shots, so Panasonic’s edge might be meaningful on extended trips where charging opportunities can be limited.

Macro and Night Photography

Panasonic’s 3 cm macro focusing distance beats Sony’s 8 cm, allowing closer-in detail shots - great for botanists or macro enthusiasts.

Night and astrophotography is more nuanced. Both cameras share the same sensor size and resolution, but Sony’s image processing and dynamic range provide cleaner high ISO shots. Sony is better suited to pulling out stars in dark skies, though neither camera is a true astrophotography powerhouse compared to larger sensor systems.

Professional Reliability and Workflow

If professional use is a criterion - such as weddings, events, or studio work - file format support and workflow become crucial.

Both cameras shoot RAW and JPEG, with reliable color profiles. Panasonic provides additional focus bracketing and stacking features ideal for extended depth-of-field macro work.

Sony excels in autofocus reliability and file consistency, but its battery life and heat management under prolonged use (4K video included) may require spare power solutions.

Performance Breakdown and Ratings

When it comes down to pure numbers, these ratings summarize testing:

Where Each Camera Excels (And Where They Don’t)

• Portraits: Panasonic edges out with telephoto reach and warm tone reproduction; Sony wins on autofocus eye tracking.
• Landscapes: Sony’s dynamic range advantage helps in peak light conditions.
• Wildlife: Panasonic’s zoom is invaluable; Sony’s AF and frame rate better capture fast action.
• Sports: Sony is the clear winner for rapid focus and burst shooting.
• Street: Sony’s size and discreetness are superior.
• Macro: Panasonic’s better close focusing distances shine.
• Night/Astro: Sony’s superior high ISO handling wins here.
• Video: Both strong, with Sony slightly ahead in technical quality.
• Travel: Sony’s compactness wins; Panasonic’s battery life is a plus.
• Professional: Sony’s AF and file quality are top marks, but Panasonic’s extra focus features lure macro pros.

Connectivity, Storage, and Special Features

Both cameras offer built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth - essential for quick image transfers. Sony slightly outscores Panasonic with NFC support for quicker pairing.

On storage, both accept a single SD card slot supporting UHS-I cards (Sony also supports Memory Stick Pro Duo - a legacy format less important today).

Neither camera is weather sealed, so extra care or protective housing is needed for adventurous shooting.

Final Thoughts: Which Camera Wins Your Heart - and Camera Bag?

So, after testing these two heavily capable and well-engineered cameras, the takeaway isn’t as simple as declaring a winner. Instead, it depends heavily on your shooting style, budget, and which compromises you’re ready to make.

Pick the Panasonic FZ1000 II If:

• You want longer zoom reach (16x) for wildlife or travel with fewer lens changes.
• You appreciate a substantial grip and physical dials with an SLR-like feel.
• You prioritize battery life for extended outings.
• Your work includes macro or you want built-in focus stacking/bracketing.
• You want a fully articulated screen for varied shooting angles.
• Your budget is tighter (around $900 street price).

Pick the Sony RX100 VII If:

• You demand the fastest, most precise autofocus (including animal and human eye AF).
• You want a compact powerhouse that can slip quietly into pockets.
• Burst shooting speed for sports and fast action is critical.
• Video quality and codec options matter.
• You shoot landscapes or night scenes requiring superior dynamic range.
• You’re willing to spend a premium (~$1300) for cutting-edge tech in a tiny package.

Ultimately, both are excellent companions in the 1” sensor compact and bridge camera arena. My personal preference tends toward Sony RX100 VII for “carry everywhere” use and dynamic quick snaps, but the Panasonic FZ1000 II remains a brilliant tool when zoom range and ergonomics hold priority.

If you want more hands-on help deciding, feel free to ask - after countless hours behind the viewfinder, there’s little I haven’t uncovered in these two rivals.

Happy shooting!

End of article