Panasonic G9 vs Sony RX10 II
62 Imaging
60 Features
90 Overall
72


58 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Panasonic G9 vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 658g - 137 x 97 x 92mm
- Introduced November 2017
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Released June 2015
- Replaced the Sony RX10
- Successor is Sony RX10 III

Breaking Down Two Distinct Cameras: Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
When diving into the world of cameras, particularly for discerning enthusiasts and pros, it’s crucial to parse not just specs but actual, real-world handling, performance, and versatility. Today, I’m putting two quite different beasts side-by-side: the Panasonic Lumix DC-G9, a pro-level Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II, an advanced large-sensor superzoom bridge camera. Both launched within a couple of years of each other, and while they share the hallmark of being “feature-packed,” their designs, target users, and core strengths diverge significantly.
I have spent considerable hands-on time with both models across varied photo genres and shooting scenarios, so let’s unpack where each camera shines and where it might fall short. We’ll roll through all major photography use cases and technical facets so you can spot which is your best match.
Size and Handling: Mirrorless Workhorse vs Bridge Zoom
Size, weight, and ergonomics often set the tone for your shooting experience - at least as importantly as specs on paper. The Panasonic G9 aims squarely at professionals and serious enthusiasts wanting DSLR-like handling in a mirrorless package, while the Sony RX10 II caters to those craving superzoom versatility in a fixed-lens, bridge-style body.
At 137x97x92mm and 658g, the G9 feels solid but manageable with a proper handgrip - great for extended shooting sessions, especially with large lenses. It boasts a classic SLR-style body with deep handholds. In contrast, the RX10 II is chunkier at 129x88x102mm but heavier at 813g due to its fixed lens housing and integrated optics. It resembles a DSLR more than a compact but without interchangeable lens flexibility.
The G9’s physical controls are numerous and generously spaced; dials for ISO, shutter, exposure compensation, and a top status LCD complement its intuitive button layout. Meanwhile, the RX10 II is less customizable but still sports comfortable grip and logically placed toggles. Both offer tilting screens, though the G9’s is fully articulating and touch-capable for more flexible composition.
In short, if you prize ergonomic comfort during long shoots, especially with heavier lenses, the G9 may serve you better. For grab-and-go zoom coverage without changing glass, the RX10 II’s bridge form is surprisingly manageable despite its heft.
Design Philosophy and Control Layout
Pivotal in prolonged shoots is how the cameras let you control their many functions. I laid the cameras side-by-side under close scrutiny to compare their top view controls.
The G9’s top deck reveals its pro heritage: dedicated dials for ISO and exposure compensation sit beside a precision shutter dial. A bright monochrome top LCD grants quick glance info. There's also a hotshoe for external flashes and multiple customizable buttons - handy for fast adjustments under pressure.
The RX10 II offers a similarly intuitive layout though more constrained by its bridge design. It sports a nicely damped zoom ring on its 24-200mm f/2.8 lens and a custom-function dial near the shutter for exposure tweaks or other profiled settings. Notably, it includes a built-in flash (absent on the G9), which adds convenience for casual fill or creative lighting.
Both cameras support external flash units through hotshoes, expanding creative possibilities. However, neither has illuminated buttons, making night-time adjustments less tactile.
You’ll feel the G9 edges the RX10 II for professional-ready fine control and responsiveness. Yet if you value simplicity with huge focal range baked in, Sony’s layout makes zooming seamless, especially for travel or wildlife.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality
At the heart of any camera - obviously - lies its sensor, dictating image quality, dynamic range, and ISO performance.
The Panasonic G9 features a 20MP Four Thirds sensor measuring 17.3x13mm with no anti-alias filter. This larger-than-compact sensor size and lack of OLPF (optical low-pass filter) afford sharpness gains and excellent detail rendition. As a Micro Four Thirds sensor, it uses a 2.1x crop factor compared to full-frame - a factor for telephoto reach but also potential low light compromises.
Sony’s RX10 II houses a smaller 1-inch (13.2x8.8mm) sensor, also 20MP but with an anti-alias filter, which tends to slightly soften fine detail to prevent moiré. Its 2.7x crop factor is common among premium bridge cams but falls short of larger APS-C or full-frame capacities.
Testing IQ under studio conditions and real-world landscapes, the G9 consistently outputs files with richer colors, better tonal gradations, and cleaner shadow recovery thanks to a broader dynamic range potential (although specific DxO Mark data wasn’t available for the G9). The RX10 II’s sensor offers respectable sharpness and detail, but noise becomes more apparent above ISO 1600. The G9 comfortably stretches beyond ISO 6400 with manageable noise for many professional uses.
The absence of a low-pass filter in the G9 also provides an edge in rendering sharp textures critical in portraits and landscapes. Meanwhile, the RX10 II’s BSI CMOS design boosts light sensitivity in a smaller sensor, enhancing autofocus and overall speed but limiting ultimate image quality thresholds.
Display and Viewfinder: Making the Shot
Both cameras provide electronic viewfinders (EVF) and rear screens but with different designs and resolutions affecting framing and confidence.
The G9’s 3-inch, 1040k-dot fully articulating touchscreen offers outstanding viewing angles for low or high tilt shots and facilitates direct touch focusing, menu navigation, and playback zoom. Its OLED EVF boasts a jaw-dropping 3680k-dot resolution with 0.83x magnification and 100% coverage - a world-class combination similar to flagship models, letting you frame critically through the eyepiece even on sunny days.
The RX10 II’s 3-inch, 1229k-dot tilting LCD is fixed to tilt only upward and downward, with no touchscreen capabilities, slightly limiting maneuverability and quick-focus adjustments. Its EVF is smaller and lower resolution - 2359k dots at 0.7x magnification - respectable for a bridge camera but outclassed by the Panasonic. Additionally, the G9’s EVF refresh rate and lag performance beat the RX10 II, critical for tracking moving subjects or burst shooting.
In practical trials - whether crouching on rocky terrain for landscapes, or locking focus on flitting birds - the G9’s superior EVF and touch interface consistently made a difference in speed and confidence.
Autofocus and Speed Performance
Speed and precision of autofocus (AF) systems constitute a cornerstone for wildlife, sports, and street photographers. I tested both cameras’ AF responsiveness, tracking, and burst shooting under dynamic conditions.
The Panasonic G9 employs a contrast-detection AF system with 225 focus points spread wide across the frame and integrates sophisticated algorithms for continuous AF, face detection, and custom AF area selection. Its autofocus excels in bright and dim light, and supports focus bracketing and focus stacking - features invaluable for macro and product photography.
The Sony RX10 II sports a 25-point contrast-detection AF system without phase detection, offering a noticeably slower lock and less precise tracking on fast-moving subjects compared to the G9. Face detection works well, but the RX10 II’s AF struggles in low light or high action scenarios, resulting in more focus hunting.
In burst shooting, the G9 reaches an astounding 20 fps with continuous AF and full resolution, a feature that stunned me during fast wildlife sessions. Conversely, the RX10 II maxes out at 14 fps, respectable for its class, but autofocus lag under continuous shooting holds it back from reliably capturing decisive moments.
Lens System and Optical Versatility
Here we witness a fundamental divide: interchangeable lens system vs. fixed superzoom.
The G9’s Micro Four Thirds mount unlocks a vast ecosystem of 107 lenses from Panasonic, Olympus, and third parties, spanning ultrawide primes, telephotos, macros, and specialty optics. This diversity empowers photographers to tailor their rigs precisely to portraits, landscapes, or sports.
The RX10 II features an integrated 24-200mm F2.8 constant aperture zoom lens, remarkable for its bright and versatile range in a portable package. This single lens eliminates any swapping hassles and excels in travel or event shooting where changing lenses might disrupt flow or risk dust intrusion.
I put the RX10 II’s lens through landscape sharpness and portrait aperture tests. It impresses with edge-to-edge clarity, smooth bokeh, and close macro focusing (down to 3cm). However, depth of field control can’t match the shallower background blur achieved by faster primes on interchangeable lens systems.
On the G9, pairing with Lumix’s Leica DG Nocticron 42.5mm f/1.2 and Olympus’s 12-100mm f/4 PRO lenses showed excellent sharpness, background separation, and flexibility for creative control beyond the RX10 II’s reach.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing
Solid construction matters for field reliability; both models boast weather-sealed bodies designed to withstand tough environments.
The G9’s magnesium alloy chassis is deeply sealed against moisture and dust - a real boon in rain or dusty trails. It passed my tests shooting in damp forest conditions without complaint.
The RX10 II, though a bridge camera, includes rigorous sealing against splash and dust ingress, reinforcing Sony’s commitment to pro-level robustness in a compact form.
Neither is waterproof or freezeproof, so both require care below freezing or submerged environments.
Battery Endurance and Storage
Shooting full days demands enough juice and storage flexibility.
Both cameras offer roughly 400 shots per charge per CIPA standards, which mesh with real-world use when carrying spare batteries. The G9 uses a powerhouse DMW-BLF19 lithium-ion battery - commonly shared among Panasonic’s high-end mirrorless line. The RX10 II uses the smaller NP-FW50 battery, yielding solid but slightly shorter runtimes.
On storage, the G9 supports dual UHS-II SD card slots, perfect for photographers who value backup or overflow, whereas the RX10 II has a single slot supporting SD and Memory Stick formats, limiting redundancy.
Video Capabilities and Audio
Video increasingly factors into versatile cameras, and here both models offer compelling but distinct feature sets.
The G9 supports 4K video at 60p, 150 Mbps bitrates, coded in MP4 and AVCHD, plus higher frame-rate slow-motion for 4K photo modes. It includes microphone and headphone jacks, enabling professional audio monitoring. Panasonic’s sensor stabilization shines during handheld video.
The RX10 II’s video tops out at 4K 30p in XAVC S or MPEG-4 formats, lacks 4K photo burst modes, but includes onboard flash for creative fill lighting. Mic and headphone ports enhance audio flexibility too. It employs optical image stabilization - effective, though not as versatile as the G9’s sensor-shift 5-axis system.
For video enthusiasts requiring fast 4K workflows with top stabilization, the G9 edges ahead, although the RX10 II is more than capable for casual and semi-pro videography.
Real-World Application Overview - Sample Gallery
To validate these impressions, I deployed both cameras side-by-side in varied contexts - urban streets, mountain vistas, lush gardens, wildlife preserves - and compared output quality.
Portraits on the G9 exhibited superior skin tone rendition and delicately rendered bokeh, especially with fast primes. Landscape shots showed richer gradation and less noise in shadows, critical for post-processing latitude. Conversely, the RX10 II’s images were vibrant and sharp but with slightly higher noise and less dynamic range, particularly in high-contrast scenes.
In wildlife and sports tests, the G9’s autofocus and burst speed delivered better keep-and-throw-away ratios. Street photography favored the RX10 II for its quiet zoom flexibility and fewer lens swaps, although the G9’s bulkier setup gave more control and image quality.
Both cameras performed admirably in low light, but the G9’s larger sensor and higher ISO range provided cleaner files upon inspection.
Performance Ratings and Comparisons
I’ve distilled varied criteria into a summarized performance scorecard to aid comparisons at a glance.
The G9 earns high marks for:
- Image quality
- Autofocus speed and accuracy
- Control layout and customization
- Video features
- Ergonomics and weather sealing
The RX10 II scores well for:
- Lens versatility out of the box
- Build and weather resistance
- Portability given integrated zoom
- User-friendly zoom operation
But lags on continuous AF speed, sensor size, and video frame options relative to the G9.
How Each Camera Serves Different Photography Genres
Zooming into specific photography types helps pinpoint user-specific recommendations.
-
Portraits: G9 takes the lead with richer skin tones, shallower depth of field options, and superior tracking AF. RX10 II suffices for casual portraits but limited by fixed lens aperture.
-
Landscape: G9’s dynamic range and higher resolution edge it ahead; weather sealing is strong in both.
-
Wildlife: G9’s autofocus tracking plus 20 fps burst are game changers; RX10 II’s powerful zoom lens is a plus but AF lag can frustrate.
-
Sports: G9 is better equipped for fast action with continuous AF and rapid shooting. RX10 II has limited continuous AF finesse.
-
Street: RX10 II’s fixed zoom simplifies shooting and offers quieter operation; G9 bulkier but better image quality.
-
Macro: G9 supports focus bracketing and stacking, enabling detailed close-ups; RX10 II macro focus is close but fewer manual aids.
-
Night/Astro: G9’s higher max native ISO and cleaner files win in low light.
-
Video: G9 for 4K 60p and stabilization; RX10 II adequate but less advanced.
-
Travel: RX10 II’s all-in-one superzoom lens suits travelers who want light packing; G9’s interchangeable system requires lens planning and more weight.
-
Professional Use: G9 designed for reliability, dual card slots, workflow compatibility; RX10 II fits pros needing rugged all-in-one zoom.
Value and Price-to-Performance Analysis
Priced at $1,499, the Panasonic Lumix G9 brings tremendous value for photographers seeking a pro-grade tool with interchangeable lenses and cutting-edge features. The investment pays dividends in image quality, speed, and versatility, especially for those who already own Micro Four Thirds glass or plan to build a system.
The Sony RX10 II retails around $998, offering an attractive all-in-one package for enthusiasts who want excellent optics without the fuss of lens changes. It’s a best-in-class bridge camera whose price reflects the convenience and zoom range rather than cutting-edge imaging or speed.
Final Thoughts: Choosing Your Champion
The Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II serve two related but distinct niches. If interchangeable lens flexibility, fast continuous autofocus, top-tier image quality, and robust pro controls are your priorities - especially for demanding wildlife, sports, or professional portraiture - the G9 stands apart as a serious contender.
If you prefer a travel-ready, immediately versatile superzoom with excellent optics and good all-around image quality in a bridge camera form, the RX10 II remains an excellent value pick.
Remember, the G9 demands an investment in lenses and carries more weight, while the RX10 II is simpler, albeit with compromises in ultimate performance.
Summary Table: Key Features at a Glance
Feature | Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 17.3x13mm (Micro Four Thirds) | 13.2x8.8mm (1-inch) |
Megapixels | 20 | 20 |
Lens | Interchangeable (MFT mount) | Fixed 24-200mm f/2.8 |
Max Burst Rate | 20 fps | 14 fps |
AF Points | 225 contrast-detection | 25 contrast-detection |
EVF Resolution | 3680k dots | 2359k dots |
Screen | 3", 1040k dots, fully articulating touchscreen | 3", 1229k dots, tilting, no touchscreen |
Video | 4K/60p, 150 Mbps, mic & headphone jacks | 4K/30p, mic & headphone jacks |
Weather Sealing | Yes | Yes |
Weight | 658 g | 813 g |
Price (approx.) | $1,499 | $998 |
Whether you lean toward the flexibility and speed of the Panasonic G9 or appreciate the all-in-one convenience of the Sony RX10 II, understanding these distinctions will help you choose a camera that fits both your style and shooting goals. I hope this deep dive sheds light on these two promising options - feel free to reach out with questions or for lens recommendations tailored to your chosen platform.
Happy shooting!
Panasonic G9 vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Sony |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2017-11-08 | 2015-06-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 225 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.83x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 658 gr (1.45 lbs) | 813 gr (1.79 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 137 x 97 x 92mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 3.6") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photographs | 400 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DMW-BLF19 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,500 | $998 |