Panasonic Lumix LX100 II vs Panasonic Lumix FH7: An In-Depth Comparative Review for Photography Enthusiasts

Selecting the right compact camera often involves balancing image quality, usability, and versatility - criteria particularly important for enthusiasts and professionals valuing portability without sacrificing performance. Today, we take a meticulous look at two Panasonic models with markedly different approaches yet reportedly targeting segments where compactness and convenience are prized: the Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II (hereafter LX100 II) and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH7 (hereafter FH7).

Drawing upon years of camera testing and analysis, this hands-on comparison dives deep into technical specifications, real-world photographic applications across genres, handling ergonomics, and value propositions. By the end, readers will be empowered to determine which model better suits their creative demands and budget constraints.

Size, Ergonomics, and Handling: Portability vs. Control

A camera’s physical design and how it feels in hand profoundly impact practical usability during long shoots or spontaneous moments. Let's start by examining the contrasting body designs and ergonomics of the LX100 II and FH7.

The LX100 II is classified as a large sensor compact, weighing a robust 392 grams with dimensions of 115 x 66 x 64 mm. Its heft and grip afford a confident hold and stability, especially helpful when working at slower shutter speeds or using manual focus controls. The lens barrel protrudes significantly, indicating the presence of a more substantial zoom optic suited for professional-grade image quality.

On the other hand, the FH7 epitomizes a small sensor compact camera, weighing a mere 126 grams and measuring only 95 x 56 x 19 mm. This striking lightness and thin profile give FH7 outstanding portability, easily slipping into a pocket or handbag. However, such slimness limits larger physical dials and grip contours, which can restrict prolonged handling comfort and precise manual operation.

The tradeoff between long-term shooting comfort and ultimate portability is clear: the LX100 II better serves those prioritizing control and handling over absolute compactness, while the FH7 favors casual shooters valuing minimal bulk above extensive functionality.

Body and Interface: Control Layout and User Experience

Successful photography relies on intuitive controls and responsive interfaces, especially in fast-paced or challenging environments. Here we compare these aspects further.

The LX100 II boasts a thoughtfully arranged dedicated control layout, including traditional dials for aperture, shutter speed, exposure compensation, and drive modes. This affords quick in-field adjustments without digging through menus - a significant advantage for advanced users who value tactile feedback and speed.

Conversely, the FH7 minimizes physical buttons to maintain its slim profile, opting mainly for touch-based interaction with limited dedicated manual controls. While this simplifies operation for casual users, it constrains more nuanced exposure control and quick parameter changes - elements professional or enthusiast photographers often require.

Additionally, the LX100 II incorporates an electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2,760k-dot resolution covering 100% of the frame and a magnification of 0.7x, facilitating precise framing especially in bright daylight. The FH7, lacking any kind of viewfinder, relies strictly on its LCD screen for composing; this can prove challenging outdoors or for photographers preferring eye-level composition.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Foundation of Photographic Excellence

Sensor characteristics critically shape the image quality potential. Panasonic’s choice of sensor technology and resolution directly distinguishes these models’ photographic prowess.

The LX100 II features a 17MP Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) CMOS sensor, substantially larger than the FH7’s 16MP 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.08 x 4.56 mm), with an effective sensor area difference dramatic enough to impact dynamic range, noise performance, and depth of field control noticeably.

Technical ramifications include:

• Dynamic Range: The LX100 II’s larger sensor allows superior dynamic latitude, capturing nuanced highlights and shadows in challenging contrast scenarios - key for landscape and portrait photography requiring detail preservation.

• ISO Performance: Thanks to the CMOS sensor and advanced Venus Engine processor, LX100 II offers a native ISO range of 200–25600, with cleaner results at higher sensitivities. By contrast, the FH7 maxes out at ISO 6400 with a less noise-resilient CCD sensor, making it less ideal for low-light work.

• Depth of Field Control: Larger sensor size enables shallower depth of field, beneficial for portraits where subject-background separation and creamy bokeh add professional polish - a domain where FH7’s small sensor inherently struggles.

Resolution-wise, both deliver roughly 16–17MP, with LX100 II producing marginally more optimized pixel quality due to sensor architecture. However, FH7's smaller sensor and fewer advanced processing options limit its sharpness and color fidelity under demanding conditions.

Display and Viewfinder: Composition Tools Compared

Modern cameras depend heavily on the quality and usability of their LCDs and viewfinders. Here, we contrast both models’ presentation and control interfaces.

In terms of rear displays, both sport 3-inch LCDs, but the LX100 II offers a higher resolution touchscreen (1240k dots) compared to the FH7’s 230k dots, enriching usability and image review clarity. Touch capabilities exist in both, easing navigation, but the LX100 II’s responsiveness and multi-touch functionality prove superior during testing.

Crucially, the LX100 II includes an OLED electronic viewfinder providing precise framing and eye-level shooting that dramatically benefits outdoor use and adds compositional confidence, particularly with complex lighting.

The FH7’s lack of viewfinder means composing relies solely on the LCD, which due to lower resolution and no articulating mechanisms hampers usability across varying shooting angles and lighting conditions - important considerations for street photographers or outdoor enthusiasts.

Lens and Focusing Systems: Versatility and Precision

Lens attributes and AF capabilities determine practical shooting flexibility and image sharpness reliability.

The LX100 II’s fixed Leica-branded zoom lens covers a useful 24-75mm equivalent with a bright maximum aperture from f/1.7 at the wide end to f/2.8 at telephoto, allowing remarkable background separation and strong low-light performance. This lens also offers very close 3cm macro focusing, facilitating detailed close-ups.

The *FH7 telescope zoom spans 28-112mm equivalent but with a slower aperture range of f/3.1 to f/6.5, limiting depth of field control and performance in dim settings. Its macro capability extends to 5cm but lacks the optical crunchiness or sharpness offered by the LX100 II lens.

Regarding autofocus, the LX100 II employs a contrast detection system with 49 focus points, including face detection and touch AF, with continuous and tracking modes offering solid performance in real-world scenarios, albeit not cutting-edge by mirrorless standards. The FH7’s AF system is simpler, with fewer AF points (11), no manual focus support, and more limited continuous AF modes - adequate for snapshots but suboptimal for fast action or precise focus applications.

Burst Shooting, Shutter Speeds, and Silent Operations: Capturing the Decisive Moment

For photographers documenting action or fleeting moments, frame rates and shutter control are paramount.

The LX100 II is equipped with an impressive continuous shooting speed of 11 fps, a considerably fast rate complemented by mechanical shutter speeds ranging from 1/1800s to 1/4000s and electronic shutter options reaching 1/16000s. The inclusion of silent electronic shutter mode aids discreet shooting in sensitive environments.

In contrast, the FH7 offers a maximum burst rate of 4 fps with limited shutter speed range from 1/60s to 1/1600s, effectively limiting its usability for sports or wildlife photography where rapid responsiveness is crucial.

Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations for Extended Shoots

Longevity and file management influence real-world usability.

The LX100 II, powered by a DMW-BLE9 lithium-ion battery, offers a respectable 340 shots per charge, better suited for extended excursions or professional use where access to charging may be scarce. It utilizes standard SD/SDHC/SDXC cards (UHS-I supported) and includes a single card slot.

The FH7, meanwhile, is rated at 260 shots per charge, which is fair given its smaller sensor and reduced power demand but may fall short for intensive sessions. It supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards plus internal storage but lacks high-speed card support, potentially hampering rapid shooting or video tasks.

Video Capabilities: From Casual Clips to 4K Vlogging

Video performance in compact cameras varies widely, particularly with sensor size and processing power.

The LX100 II supports up to 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD at 30 fps) with a high max bitrate of 100 Mbps in MP4/MOV H.264 format, making it appealing for hybrid shooters or casual videographers seeking quality output and easy editing. Features such as 4K photo mode enable grabbing high-res stills from video sequences, increasing versatility. However, the absence of microphone or headphone jacks limits advanced audio workflows.

In contrast, the FH7 maxes out at 1280 x 720 (HD 720p at 30 fps) with MJPEG compression, delivering modest video quality primarily suited for casual home movies. The lack of external audio input options and no 4K support position it clearly below the LX100 II for video-centric users.

Durability, Weather Resistance, and Professional Reliability

Neither camera is rated for weather sealing, waterproofing, or freeze resistance - typical for compacts but important for outdoor or professional field use. However, the LX100 II’s more robust build and larger body inherently afford better durability and longevity under demanding conditions compared to the more fragile and lightweight FH7.

Value Assessment: Balancing Price Against Performance

At launch, the LX100 II retailed near $998 while the FH7 was priced around $149, reflecting their target audience and capability gaps.

• The LX100 II commands a premium justified by its large sensor, superior optics, manual controls, and 4K video - all points critically valued by enthusiasts and pros alike.

• The FH7 delivers entry-level affordability aimed at complete beginners or users wanting ultra-portable point-and-shoot simplicity, but with significant compromises in image quality and flexibility.

Performance Scores and Genre Specializations: What the Numbers Say

To crystallize distinctions, here are comprehensive ratings integrating sensor, autofocus, handling, and functionality aspects.

• Portrait Photography: LX100 II excels with shallow depth of field, accurate skin tones, and effective eye detection autofocus, making it a compelling tool for portraits. The FH7 struggles due to small sensor depth limits and less precise AF.

• Landscape Photography: The LX100 II’s dynamic range and resolution outperform the FH7, which suffers from noise and limited detail in shadows.

• Wildlife and Sports: LX100 II’s faster AF and higher burst rate allow better subject tracking, though it is no sports-specialized camera. The FH7’s sluggish AF and slow shooting hamper action capture.

• Street Photography: FH7 scores points for extreme portability and silence but loses to LX100 II in image quality and viewfinder convenience.

• Macro and Close-Ups: LX100 II’s closer minimum focus distance and better optics yield sharper, more detailed close-ups.

• Night and Astro: LX100 II’s superior high ISO handling and longer exposure options deliver cleaner, functional night images where FH7 falls short.

• Video Work: Clearly dominated by LX100 II’s 4K support and superior bitrates.

• Travel Photography: The LX100 II, with better features, remains relatively compact (albeit heavier than FH7), making it a versatile travel companion, especially for photographers seeking quality over absolute lightness.

Real-World Image Comparisons: Visual Proof

Examining representative images shot under consistent conditions reveals the qualities discussed.

Panasonic LX100 II front Panasonic LX100 II screen back Panasonic FH7 front Panasonic FH7 screen back

Notably, LX100 II shots exhibit richer color depth, finer detail, and less noise at higher ISO settings. FH7 images are softer with muted tones and higher chroma noise, particularly under low-light or shadowed conditions.

Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses

Who Should Buy Which Camera?

Choose Panasonic LX100 II if:

• You are a photography enthusiast or professional seeking image quality near the level of interchangeable lens cameras.
• You value manual control, fast shooting, and 4K video output.
• Portrait, landscape, travel, and hybrid video/still capture are your primary applications.
• You desire a high-performance compact camera without the bulk of DSLRs or mirrorless systems.

Choose Panasonic FH7 if:

• You want a pocketable, ultra-lightweight compact for casual snapshots.
• Budget constraints limit options to entry-level cameras.
• You prioritize ease of use and convenience over image quality or advanced operation.
• Light travel and social photography with simple video are your main needs.

Final Thoughts: Balancing Ambition and Practicality in Compact Cameras

The Panasonic LX100 II and FH7 represent divergent philosophies in compact camera design: one emphasizing quality, control, and versatility, the other favoring simplicity, portability, and affordability. For serious image creators, the LX100 II’s larger sensor, excellent lens, advanced controls, and 4K video markedly excel and justify the increased size and cost.

Meanwhile, the FH7 caters respectfully to absolute beginners or mobile casual users requiring no fuss camera solutions, albeit at the expense of image fidelity and creative flexibility.

Reflecting on my extensive experience testing thousands of cameras, the LX100 II is a rare compact that blends subjective feel with objective imaging excellence, deserving strong consideration for enthusiasts unwilling to compromise too much for pocket convenience. The FH7 remains a niche value proposition simpler in scope and suitable for documented day-to-day memories by non-demanding users.

This article integrated comprehensive data evaluation, including direct side-by-side testing, sensor analysis, autofocus benchmarking, and real-world usage insights to provide balanced, authoritative guidance for informed camera purchase decisions.

[End of article]