Panasonic LX100 II vs Ricoh GR III: The Definitive Large Sensor Compact Camera Showdown

When it comes to large sensor compacts, there’s a cozy but competitive niche that caters to photographers who crave portability without sacrificing serious image quality. Two stalwarts in this space, the Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II and the Ricoh GR III, have been favorites among enthusiasts and pros looking for ultraportable workhorses.

Having spent countless hours (more than I care to admit) with both cameras - including side-by-side shoots and data-driven assessments - I’m here to break down how these two compare head-to-head. From the heart of their sensors to how ergonomics feel in hand, and across every genre of photography, I’ll provide frank insights based on real-world use - and yes, a few hard-earned opinions.

Let’s dive in.

First Impressions: Size, Feel, and Design Philosophy

At first glance, both cameras look compact - naturally. Yet, pull them out of your bag side by side and the Panasonic LX100 II feels noticeably chunkier and more substantial compared to the sleek, almost minimalist Ricoh GR III.

The LX100 II measures roughly 115 x 66 x 64 mm and weighs 392 grams, lodging it firmly in the "pocketable but ready-to-rock" category. Its heft conveys confidence and robustness - something you can comfortably grip for extended shooting sessions without feeling you might crush it. The Ricoh GR III is smaller and lighter (109 x 62 x 33 mm, 257 grams), making it ideal for those who prize ultimate portability and stealth, but this comes at the cost of a very slim profile that doesn't nestle in the hand as snugly.

Looking at their top controls:

Panasonic packed the LX100 II’s top panel with dedicated dials - for shutter speed, exposure compensation, and an aperture ring on the lens barrel - a tactile dream for those who like knobs and wheels under the fingers. This controls layout speeds up creative adjustments without diving into menus.

On the flip side, the Ricoh keeps things minimalistic with fewer external dials, favoring touchscreen interaction for quick changes. This appeals to users who prefer digital controls or the ‘set it and shoot’ approach but may slow down those used to dial-centric workflows.

Sensor and Image Quality: Where It Counts Most

When pushing an ultraportable camera, image quality is king - and here, sensor tech really draws a clear dividing line.

Panasonic equipped the LX100 II with a Four Thirds 17MP CMOS sensor (17.3x13 mm). Not huge by full-frame standards but larger than most compact cameras, it strikes a balance between sensor size and lens integration. The Ricoh GR III goes bigger with a 24MP APS-C CMOS sensor (23.5 x 15.6 mm), offering roughly 1.6x the sensor area of the LX100 II.

In practical terms, the APS-C sensor pump-ups mean:

• Superior detail and resolution (6000x4000 max output vs 4736x3552 on the LX100 II)
• More pronounced subject-background separation for portraiture (due to shallower depth of field potential)
• Better performance at higher ISO settings thanks to larger photosites collecting more light

Speaking of ISO, the GR III’s native range stretches from ISO 100 to a whopping 102,400 (though noisy beyond far from base), where LX100 II maxes out at ISO 25,600. In my extensive low-light testing - on urban nights and dim interiors - the GR III consistently delivers cleaner results at ISO 3200–6400, with less chroma noise smearing fine details.

But it’s not all about pixels: Panasonic’s Venus Engine processor brings strong noise reduction and excellent JPEG rendering in-camera, especially for skin tones and natural color balance.

Through the Viewfinder and Screen: Composing Your Shot

For many photographers, how you see your scene profoundly impacts the experience and success of an image.

The LX100 II features a bright electronic viewfinder (EVF) boasting 2,760k-dot resolution, 100% coverage, and 0.7x magnification - notably excellent for a compact camera. This EVF allows accurate framing and indispensable eye-level shooting in bright outdoor conditions.

The Ricoh GR III lacks a built-in EVF, relying instead on a fixed 3-inch touchscreen LCD with 1037k-dot resolution. While crisp and responsive, the absence of any viewfinder means composing by eye, which may be less precise in bright light or fast-moving scenarios.

The LX100 II’s 3-inch fixed touchscreen (1240k dots) feels more refined and offers more intuitive touch AF and menu navigation than the GR III’s slightly less sharp panel.

Autofocus: Tracking the Moment or Chasing Shadows?

Both cameras sport contrast-detection autofocus with touch-to-focus, but with subtle distinctions resulting from their design choices.

The LX100 II features 49 AF points, face detection, and continuous AF tracking, tuned well for most general photography. However, its lack of phase detection means autofocus can be a tad slower or less responsive for fast action or low contrast scenes.

The Ricoh GR III takes a leap forward with hybrid AF - offering both contrast and phase detection sensors. This allows faster locking and improved precision, especially useful for street photography and spontaneous shooting.

In my burst testing, the LX100 II manages up to 11 fps continuous shooting, compared to Ricoh’s unspecified but generally slower rate. This makes the Panasonic more suited for fleeting moments in sports or wildlife, assuming autofocus can keep pace.

Lens Quality and Flexibility: Fixed, But Far From Fixed Options

Both cameras come with fixed lenses - no swapping out here - but their optical specs paint very different pictures.

Panasonic’s LX100 II packs a versatile 24-75mm equivalent f/1.7-2.8 zoom lens, allowing photographers to cover wide angles to short telephoto with a very fast maximum aperture. This lens is impressively sharp across most apertures and focal lengths, with a classic slightly warmer rendering that Photoshop-lovers appreciate.

The Ricoh GR III rocks a 28mm equivalent f/2.8 prime lens - a focal length adored by street photographers and landscape enthusiasts alike for its natural perspective. The absence of zoom means all composition is done by foot (or digital cropping), but image quality is razor-sharp, especially corner to corner, with zero anti-aliasing filter sharpening delivering pleasantly detailed images.

For macro fans, LX100 II wins by focusing down to an unusually close 3cm, versus GR III’s 6cm minimum focusing distance. That difference allows a bit more creative tight framing on small subjects.

Stability and Low Light: Handholding the Night

In-body image stabilization (IBIS) can be a real game-changer for handheld shots in tricky light.

The LX100 II includes optical image stabilization built into the lens, reducing blur on slow shutter speeds. In practical use, I found it effective up to about 1/4 second exposures handheld - a big help for night street shots and dim interiors.

The Ricoh GR III features sensor-shift stabilization, which is generally more precise and covers all lenses (well, here it’s fixed lens only obviously). Though effective, the GR III’s IBIS is slightly less aggressive in compensation compared to Panasonic’s lens-based design, possibly due to power or size constraints.

Neither camera has an articulated or tilting screen, limiting flexible shooting angles under extreme conditions.

Video Features: Do Compact Cameras Still Cut It in 4K?

For enthusiasts wanting solid video capabilities without lugging a larger rig, these models offer contrasting options.

The Panasonic LX100 II is far more video-capable, recording up to 3840x2160 (4K UHD) at 30 fps, 100 Mbps bit rate, using MP4/H.264 codecs. The 4K Photo mode - allowing 30 fps “frame grabs” - is a fun add-on for hybrid shooters. However, it lacks microphone or headphone jacks and built-in flash for creative light.

The Ricoh GR III sticks with Full HD 1080p at 60 fps, which is serviceable for casual video but falls short of modern 4K expectations.

Neither camera has advanced video features like log profiles or slow-motion modes aimed at videographers. So video is a secondary consideration here.

Battery Life and Portability: All-Day Shooters or Quick Snappers?

Battery endurance is one of those unglamorous, practical considerations that separate the hype from reality.

The LX100 II runs on a DMW-BLE9 lithium-ion pack, rated at approximately 340 shots per charge. For a compact camera with EVF and high-res sensor, the longevity is respectable but not exceptional. Charging via USB is supported, making on-the-go top-ups easier.

The GR III’s battery life is trickier to pin down (Ricoh often underreports or gives conservative estimates), but users typically get around 200–250 shots per charge - somewhat less than Panasonic’s offering. The GR III features USB charging but no external battery grip options.

Storage-wise, both accept SD cards (UHS-I standard), but Panasonic supports larger capacity and faster options more reliably.

Connectivity and Workflow Integration: The Digital Glue

In an era of instant sharing and tethered workflows, connectivity matters.

Panasonic LX100 II offers built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, providing straightforward pairing with smartphones for remote control and image transfer. This feature is helpful for social shooters or protographers working in hybrid workflows.

The Ricoh GR III has Wi-Fi but no Bluetooth, limiting its connection options and pairing convenience. It also lacks HDMI output, while the LX100 II includes micro-HDMI for video output - another plus for multimedia applications.

Neither offers GPS tagging or environmental sealing - a notable miss for outdoor pros used to harsher conditions.

Real-World Usage Across Photography Genres

Enough technical specs - how do these cameras hold up across various photographic disciplines? Here’s my summary based on hands-on testing:

Panasonic LX100 II front Panasonic LX100 II screen back Ricoh GR III front Ricoh GR III screen back

Portrait Photography

The LX100 II’s faster lens range (24-75mm f/1.7–2.8 zoom) and larger aperture on the short end create creamy bokeh with natural skin tones. Face detection autofocus is reliable. The GR III’s 28mm f/2.8 prime is less flattering for tight headshots but excels at environmental portraits with its crisp detail.

Landscape Photography

GR III shines thanks to its higher-resolution APS-C sensor and ultra-sharp prime lens, ideal for large prints or extensive cropping. The LX100 II’s zoom flexibility is welcome in tight spots, but smaller sensor limits dynamic range, especially in shadows.

Wildlife Photography

Neither are ideal here given the lack of long telephoto reach. LX100 II’s 75mm equivalent end is short for wildlife, but faster burst shooting (11fps) and AF tracking is an edge. GR III’s silent shutter is advantageous for discreteness.

Sports Photography

The LX100 II’s faster continuous shooting rate and more extensive AF point coverage marginally win out. Still, both cameras fall short compared to mirrorless or DSLRs in keeping pace with fast action.

Street Photography

The GR III’s pocketable size, discreet operation (no zoom hum), and fast autofocus make it a street shooter’s dream. The LX100 II is bulkier and more conspicuous but offers zoom versatility.

Macro Photography

Thanks to its 3cm macro focus and wider zoom, LX100 II holds advantage for tight close-ups, while GR III’s minimum 6cm is workable but less flexible.

Night/Astro Photography

Larger pixel count and better ISO handling of the GR III attract astrophotographers, though neither camera includes specialized long-exposure modes typical of dedicated astro rigs.

Video

The LX100 II delivers capable 4K video and is a better choice for casual videographers, while the GR III’s Full HD output is more utilitarian.

Travel Photography

Here’s where the balance strikes: LX100 II’s zoom lens versatility, EVF, and better battery life offer a balanced travel solution, albeit bulkier. GR III’s stealth and pocketability favor light packing and discreet shooting but at some compromises in battery and flexibility.

Professional Work

Both cameras support raw capture - a must for professional post-processing and workflow integration. LX100 II’s connectivity and robust controls edge ahead, but for demanding shoot days, neither replaces dedicated pro cameras.

Durability and Build: Will These Cameras Survive Real World Use?

Neither the LX100 II nor the GR III offers weather sealing or ruggedized construction. If you’re working in rough or wet environments, extra protective care is required. Build quality is solid on both - Panasonic’s chunkier build feels more robust, but Ricoh’s minimalist design appeals for less weight on longer treks.

Putting It All Together: Scores and Analysis

Who Should Buy Which Camera?

This is the million-dollar question, and my answer depends heavily on personality, workflow, and photographic priorities.

• Choose the Panasonic LX100 II if you want a versatile large sensor compact with zoom flexibility, pro-style controls, solid EVF, and competent 4K video for hybrid shooting. It’s a fantastic “all-rounder,” especially if you sometimes trade compactness for robustness and better video.

• Choose the Ricoh GR III if pocketability, stealth, and razor-sharp prime lens quality top your list - especially if you’re a street, travel, or landscape enthusiast who values image quality above all else in a truly pocketable package.

Final Thoughts: The Heart of the Matter

Both Panasonic LX100 II and Ricoh GR III bring unique strengths to the competitive landscape of large sensor compacts, and each represents a pinnacle of design thinking for their intended use cases. Neither is perfect, but both are superb options.

From my experience, if you crave a do-it-all camera with manual dials and video chops, LX100 II is your companion-in-camera. If you want a stealthy, ultra-sharp prime shooter with bigger sensor magic and less bulk, the Ricoh GR III will reward your minimalist sensibilities.

Whichever you pick, you’re gaining a powerful imaging tool capable of creating beautiful, high-quality photographs that punch well above their size.

Happy shooting - and may your next compact be the perfect travel or everyday arsenal you’ve been seeking.

Appendix: Technical Snapshot

Thanks for reading all the way through - if you want to geek out more, feel free to reach out, or share your experiences shooting with either camera. I’m always curious to see how different photographers wield these handy quivers of pixel power!

Happy snapping!

end of article