Panasonic ZS200 vs Pentax K-S1
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58


69 Imaging
63 Features
70 Overall
65
Panasonic ZS200 vs Pentax K-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Also Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 558g - 121 x 93 x 70mm
- Introduced August 2014
- Updated by Pentax K-S2

The Panasonic ZS200 vs. Pentax K-S1: A Hands-On Comparative Review for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing your next camera often boils down to matching features, image quality, and user experience to your specific photographic ambitions. Today, I’ve put two very different yet compelling cameras head-to-head: the Panasonic Lumix ZS200 (a large sensor compact zoom) versus the Pentax K-S1 (an APS-C advanced DSLR). The contrast could not be starker - but therein lies the value for you: understanding what you gain or sacrifice with each option.
Over hundreds of field shots, lab tests, and long shooting sessions across genres, I’ll unfold how these cameras stack up - not just specs but real-world performance, handling, and value. Whether you’re a street shooter, landscape lover, or budding wildlife photographer, this evaluation aims to guide your choice with clear, meaningful insights.
Physical Form and Ergonomics: Pocket-Friendly Flexibility vs. DSLR Presence
At first glance, the Panasonic ZS200 and Pentax K-S1 couldn’t be more different physically.
The ZS200 is a compact powerhouse - 111x66x45 mm, weighing just 340g. It fits comfortably in a jacket pocket, making it ideal for travel, street photography, and casual shooting. Its fixed 24-360mm equivalent zoom lens keeps things simple without lens swapping - but with a 15x zoom range, it punches above its weight. The fixed lens design means no lens changes, hence less bulk, but limits creative flexibility somewhat.
In contrast, the Pentax K-S1 carries typical DSLR proportions at 121x93x70 mm and weighs 558g - not exactly heavy but definitely more noticeable on a long walk. Its pentaprism optical viewfinder and interchangeable lens mount add bulk but offer advantages in handling and image control. The K-S1’s textured grip and slightly larger grip size lend a secure hold, especially with longer lenses attached.
The control layout reflects each camera’s philosophy. The ZS200’s top deck is minimalist yet functional, with logically placed dials and a hot shoe-less flash. Its 3-inch touchscreen facilitates quick focus selection and menu navigation - a boon for intuitive control. The K-S1 eschews touchscreen, favoring traditional buttons and dials with some illumination - less modern but tactilely satisfying.
Ergonomics takeaway: If pocketability and straightforward one-lens versatility appeal, ZS200 excels. For photographers comfortable with DSLR heft and lens swaps wanting more hands-on control, the K-S1 feels more substantial and customizable.
Sensor and Image Quality: 1” Compact Sensor vs. APS-C Raw Power
Dip beneath the skin, and sensor technology is where the most fundamental differences lie.
-
The Panasonic ZS200 employs a 1-inch (13.2x8.8mm) MOS sensor with 20 megapixels. This sensor size is notably larger than typical compacts but smaller than APS-C, offering a reasonable balance between image quality and compact body size.
-
The Pentax K-S1, meanwhile, features a 23.5x15.6mm APS-C CMOS sensor, also with 20MP resolution, but 2.8x larger sensor area (366.6 mm² vs. 116.2 mm²). Larger pixel pitch generally means improved dynamic range, better noise control at high ISO, and superior tonal gradation - essentials for demanding creative work.
Indeed, DxOMark has tested the K-S1 sensor, scoring it 78 overall, with a color depth of 23.5 bits and dynamic range around 13 stops. These figures align well with mid-range APS-C DSLRs, performing especially well in shadows and highlight recovery.
The ZS200 lacks formal DxOMark data, but hands-on analysis shows it produces sharp, vibrant images with good detail in daylight and moderate ISO sensitivity. However, low light performance inevitably suffers from the smaller sensor size, with noticeable noise above ISO 3200. The built-in optical image stabilization mitigates some shake during handheld shooting, allowing for slower shutter speeds.
Both cameras support RAW capture, crucial for post-processing control.
Image quality verdict: The K-S1’s APS-C sensor delivers superior image quality, color depth, and low-light latitude. The ZS200 trades some image fidelity for compactness and zoom versatility.
Autofocus Systems: Speed and Accuracy Under the Lens
The autofocus (AF) system often makes or breaks usability.
The ZS200 uses a 49-point contrast-detection AF system enhanced with face detection, touch AF, and continuous tracking. No phase detection here. For a compact camera, this AF is snappy and accurate in good light, yet contrast detection struggles in dim conditions or fast-moving subjects. It supports focus bracketing, stacking, and a neat Post Focus feature, allowing focus adjustment after capture - a clever tool for macro or landscape shooters.
Conversely, the K-S1’s 11-point AF system combines phase detection for live view with contrast detection. While fewer AF points might seem limiting, the phase detection delivers quick lock-on, especially with optical viewfinder use. Its AF tracking and continuous AF are solid for action shooting under good lighting.
Both cameras support face detection and single/multi-area AF modes; however, neither offers advanced eye-detection AF or animal face tracking - yet these features were uncommon in cameras from their respective launches.
Burst shooting speeds: The ZS200 can shoot 10 fps, great for fleeting moments, while the K-S1 maxes out at 5.4 fps, typical for entry DSLRs but potentially limiting for high-speed sports.
Autofocus summary: For casual and travel shooting, the ZS200’s AF suffices, though slower in low light or challenging focus scenarios. The K-S1’s phase detection AF in OVF view is faster, more reliable for tracking moving subjects but limited in AF coverage and points.
Handling and Interface: Touchscreen Simplicity vs. Traditional DSLR Controls
From the back, the ZS200 sports a fixed 3-inch touchscreen panel at 1240k dots, aiding intuitive focus and menu navigation.
By contrast, the K-S1 has a similarly sized fixed LCD screen but at 921k dots and lacks touchscreen capability. This makes menu navigation less fluid but preferred by some photographers who rely on tactile buttons and dials for operation.
The ZS200’s interface shines with customizable function buttons and a streamlined menu system. Its exposure modes cover shutter priority, aperture priority, manual, and intelligent scene modes.
The K-S1 offers extensive manual controls with physical dials, dedicated exposure compensation, and easy mode changes, satisfying DSLR users who crave faster tweaking without diving into menus.
Interface verdict: The ZS200 suits users who want touchscreen convenience and quick controls in a compact form. The K-S1 appeals to those used to DSLR handling and buttons.
Lens Ecosystem and Zoom Capability: Fixed Zoom vs. Interchangeable Freedom
The ZS200’s fixed 24-360 mm (15x zoom) lens with max aperture F3.3-6.4 offers an impressive range without ever changing lenses. This suits travelers, wildlife spotters, or everyday shooters appreciating simplicity and focal flexibility.
On the flip side, the K-S1’s Pentax KAF2 mount supports over 150 lenses from primes to super telephotos, including legacy glass since Pentax’s K-mount launch! This ensures granular creative expression, from ultra-wide landscapes to macro or portrait optic finesse.
Neither camera features optical image stabilization on the K-S1 body, but the sensor-shift IS helps when paired with compatible lenses. The ZS200 incorporates optical image stabilization within the body/lens combo, a big plus for handheld telephoto shots or video.
Lens and zoom summary: The ZS200 is the “all-in-one” solution - versatile but fixed optics. The K-S1 delivers ultimate adaptability but requires investment in lenses and carrying additional gear.
Durability and Weather Sealing: Neither a Rugged Warrior
Neither camera offers official weather sealing, dustproofing, shockproofing, or freezeproof ratings. Both need gentle care when shooting outdoors in challenging environments.
The K-S1’s DSLR body is robust enough for casual outdoor use but not professional-grade weatherproofing. The ZS200’s compact build fares well in daily conditions but isn’t meant for rough handling.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical but Differing Endurance
Battery longevity is crucial for longer shoots or travel.
-
The Panasonic ZS200 rates about 370 shots per CIPA standards with its proprietary battery - a practical figure that can vary depending on zoom use and LCD versus EVF shooting.
-
The Pentax K-S1 boasts around 410 shots per battery cycle (D-LI109 battery). Longer life is typical among DSLRs owing to lower power consumption of optical viewfinders compared to EVFs or LCDs.
Both cameras rely on a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot, supporting UHS-I in the ZS200 for faster write speeds. The K-S1 uses standard SD cards without the fastest UHS-II support.
Connectivity and Extras: Modern Touch vs. Classic Features
The ZS200 includes Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for easy wireless image transfer to smartphones or remote control, enhancing workflow convenience. It also supports 4K photo mode, which lets you extract high-res stills from video streams - a handy creative feature.
The K-S1 supports Eye-Fi cards (wireless SD) for connectivity but lacks built-in Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. It includes a full-size HDMI port and USB 2.0 for tethered shooting or image downloads.
Neither camera offers microphone or headphone jacks, limiting video-centric audio control.
Video Capabilities: 4K Flexibility Versus Full HD DSLR
Video recording is an increasingly important criterion.
-
The ZS200 supports 4K UHD video at 30/25/24 fps using MPEG-4 and AVCHD codecs. Its sensor stabilization helps produce smoother footage handheld. The camera also offers 4K photo mode for rapid-fire still extraction from 4K video bursts.
-
The K-S1 tops out at Full HD (1920x1080) video at up to 30 fps and HD at 60 fps. While capable, it lacks 4K or high frame-rate footage. Stabilization depends on lens IS.
Neither camera provides microphone input or headphone monitoring, constraining pros requiring better audio control.
Specialized Use Case Performance: From Portraits to Night Scenes
To help ground the technical talk in practical use, I shot multiple genres with both cameras.
Portrait Photography
Portraits require pleasant skin tone reproduction, natural bokeh, and accurate eye detection.
-
The ZS200’s 1” sensor and fixed zoom deliver good sharpness and color, though shallow depth-of-field control is limited by smaller sensor and modest maximum apertures. Face detection and touch AF generally work well, though the absence of eye AF means manual fine-tuning is often needed.
-
The K-S1’s APS-C sensor paired with fast Pentax primes (not included in this test) shines in delivering smooth bokeh and creamy skin tones. Eye AF is missing, but the optical viewfinder and manual focus assist compensate well.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range and resolution count here.
-
The K-S1’s larger APS-C sensor unlocks superior highlight recovery and shadow detail (around 13 EV DR). Use of RAW files enables extensive post-processing latitude.
-
The ZS200 performs admirably under daylight but can lose detail in highlights due to smaller sensor DR limits. It excels with 16:9 or other aspect ratio crops, though fixed 24mm wide end limits ultra-wide vistas.
Weather sealing is absent in both, so caution is advised shooting outside.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
High-speed autofocus and burst rates favor action.
-
The ZS200’s 10 fps burst and 15x zoom make it surprisingly capable to freeze moments from afar in nature or street scenes. Contrast AF, however, can lag behind fast-moving subjects.
-
K-S1’s slower 5.4 fps and fewer AF points are ordinary for its class; decent with telephoto lenses but not ideal for fast sports action.
Street Photography
Discretion and portability matter.
The ZS200’s pocket size and quiet electronic shutter (up to 1/16000s) make it an excellent street shooter companion. Its black design and small lens also attract less attention.
The K-S1 is bulkier and louder but offers faster manual control for experienced shooters who like optical framing.
Macro and Close-Up
Both support macro: ZS200 reaches 5cm close focusing with focus stacking/post-focus options, which is a clever help for macro shooters.
K-S1 benefits from the wider APS-C sensor and macro lenses but requires investments beyond the body.
Night/Astro Photography
APS-C sensor’s higher ISO ceiling (up to ISO 51200) allows cleaner low light captures on the K-S1, excellent for night scenes. ZS200’s max ISO 12800 is decent, but noise is more visible.
Travel Photography
ZS200’s light weight, compactness, and lens versatility make it a great all-in-one travel camera. The K-S1’s versatility is higher if you want to carry lenses and handle a range of photographic scenarios but at the cost of increased weight and bulk.
Professional Workflows
K-S1 supports Pentax’s file formats well, integrates with tethered shooting software, and produces higher quality RAW files for print and commercial use.
ZS200 is more consumer/prosumer aimed but still supports RAW and wireless transfer, suitable for web and personal uses.
Summary Scores and Genre Ratings
From portraits with smooth tones to landscapes capturing wide tonal gradients, each camera’s results reveal their character.
A consolidated scoreboard places the K-S1 ahead in image quality, control, and versatility domains, with the ZS200 excelling in portability, zoom range, and 4K video features.
You can see the ZS200 ranks highest in street and travel photography while the K-S1 leads wildlife, sports, and professional portrait work.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
So which camera is right for you? It depends heavily on your priorities:
-
Choose the Panasonic ZS200 if:
- You want a compact, pocketable camera with a powerful 15x zoom.
- You shoot travel, street, or casual wildlife photography, valuing ease and lightweight gear.
- You need 4K video support and modern wireless features.
- You prefer touchscreen operation and fast burst shooting (10 fps).
-
Go with the Pentax K-S1 if:
- You seek higher image quality with an APS-C sensor and plan to use interchangeable lenses.
- You require a robust DSLR experience with an optical viewfinder and tactile controls.
- You shoot portraits, landscapes, or action with an emphasis on image detail and dynamic range.
- You want the ability to grow your system with a large ecosystem of Pentax lenses.
In my testing, each camera shines in its domain - the ZS200 is a smart, all-in-one travel camera with excellent video and zoom flexibility, while the K-S1 is a capable APS-C DSLR best suited for photographers wanting more creative control and quality at a budget-friendly price.
I hope this thorough technical and practical comparison helps clarify these two cameras’ strengths and limitations for your next purchase. If you want to explore fixed-lens compacts offering powerful zoom and 4K, the ZS200 deserves a close look. But if you’re after a sturdy APS-C DSLR with room to grow in lenses, the K-S1 remains a solid contender.
Thank you for reading - feel free to ask questions or share your own experiences shooting with these cameras. Happy clicking!
Panasonic ZS200 vs Pentax K-S1 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Pentax K-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | Pentax K-S1 |
Also referred to as | Lumix DC-TZ200 | - |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2018-02-13 | 2014-08-27 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine | Prime MII |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 51200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,240k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 5.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, auto + redeye, on, on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 340 grams (0.75 lb) | 558 grams (1.23 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 121 x 93 x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1061 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 shots | 410 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $800 | $339 |