Panasonic ZS80 vs Pentax K-500
86 Imaging
47 Features
70 Overall
56


64 Imaging
57 Features
70 Overall
62
Panasonic ZS80 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 327g - 112 x 69 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ95
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Announced November 2013

Panasonic ZS80 vs Pentax K-500: The Compact Superzoom Meets Entry-Level DSLR
Choosing the right camera can be a thrilling yet daunting task - especially when you're comparing two very different beasts like the Panasonic ZS80 compact superzoom and the Pentax K-500 entry-level DSLR. Having tested both extensively, I’m here to guide you through the key differences and real-world performance, all while considering the practical needs of photographers ranging from beginners to seasoned pros.
These two cameras represent two divergent philosophies: the Panasonic ZS80 offers extreme zoom versatility in a pocketable package, while the Pentax K-500 focuses on image quality with bigger sensors and a more traditional DSLR experience. Let’s unpack what that means for everyday shooting and specialized photography.
Size and Handling: Portability vs. Grip and Control
First impressions matter, and when you pick up the Panasonic ZS80 and the Pentax K-500 side by side, their physical differences jump out. The ZS80 is a compact powerhouse, measuring approximately 112×69×42mm and weighing a mere 327 grams. It easily fits in a jacket pocket or small bag, making it ideal for those who want to travel light or avoid the bulk that comes with DSLRs.
On the other hand, the Pentax K-500 is a relatively small DSLR but still significantly larger - 130×97×71mm and 646 grams, nearly double the weight of the Panasonic. The increased size results in a more substantial grip, which translates to better ergonomics for extended shooting sessions, especially when paired with the many lenses available for Pentax’s KAF2 mount.
You can see the clear tradeoff: the ZS80 is ultra-portable and great for casual or travel shooting, while the K-500 is tailored for photographers who prioritize handling and versatility with interchangeable lenses.
Design and User Interface: Vintage DSLR Feel Meets Modern Compact
Looking at the control layouts, the Pentax K-500 reflects classic DSLR design with dedicated dials, buttons, and an optical pentaprism viewfinder. Its 11-point autofocus system is controlled via physical buttons and menus designed for manual customization. While there is no touchscreen, the tactile experience appeals to those who prefer precise control without relying on menus.
The Panasonic ZS80 takes a more contemporary approach: a tilting touchscreen LCD with 1040k-dot resolution and a sizable electronic viewfinder (EVF) boasting 2330-dot resolution. The camera integrates touch autofocus and menu navigation, complemented by dedicated physical buttons. I found the touchscreen intuitive when composing in live view or reviewing images, although I do miss the fast access dials and control wheels on DSLRs.
The ZS80’s design prioritizes quick point-and-shoot versatility and ease of use, whereas the K-500 caters to those who appreciate classic DSLR controls and don’t mind spending more time in menus or physical adjustments.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Here’s where the cameras’ fundamental difference really shines through: sensor size and resolution. The Panasonic ZS80 features a 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor, measuring about 6.17 x 4.55mm with 20 megapixels. This sensor size is common for compact superzoom cameras but naturally limits low-light performance and dynamic range.
Conversely, the Pentax K-500 sports an APS-C CMOS sensor at 23.7 x 15.7mm with 16 megapixels. While it has slightly fewer megapixels, APS-C’s larger sensor size gives it a massive advantage in gathering light and producing cleaner images, especially at higher ISO settings.
Technical tests reveal the K-500’s sensor scores approximately 79 overall on DxOMark metrics with color depth of 23.7 bits, dynamic range near 13.1 EV, and low-light ISO performance reaching 1087 ISO equivalents. Unfortunately, Panasonic’s ZS80 lacks available DxOMark data, but real-world testing shows its sensor performance is visibly more limited in noise handling and color depth, especially beyond ISO 800.
This translates to sharper, cleaner images with the K-500, especially for portraits, landscapes, and low-light genres where dynamic range and noise suppression are critical. The ZS80, while good for daylight and casual snaps, can struggle with noise and detail retention under challenging conditions.
Screens and Viewfinders: Making the Image Visible
The ZS80’s 3-inch tilting touchscreen offers flexibility when shooting at odd angles or taking selfies - a feature absent on the K-500, whose fixed 3-inch TFT LCD (921k dots) is more traditional and less versatile. While the zS80’s display boasts higher resolution and touch capability, the K-500’s screen has brightness and color adjustment options with anti-reflective coating that help under direct sunlight.
Viewfinder technology is a classic point of divergence: optical on the K-500 via pentaprism, versus an electronic viewfinder on the ZS80. The optical viewfinder in the K-500 provides a natural, lag-free view with 100% frame coverage and 0.61x magnification. Meanwhile, the ZS80’s EVF is slightly smaller (0.53x magnification) but gives real-time image preview with exposure and focus aids, which proves incredibly useful for novice photographers.
For landscape shooters and outdoor photography, I tend to prefer the natural visibility of the optical viewfinder. But for those who want immediate feedback, exposure simulation, and can tolerate some lag, the EVF offers advantages, especially in low-light or macro scenarios.
Autofocus and Burst Shooting: How Fast and Accurate?
Both cameras support multiple autofocus modes and tracking options, but their performance differs by sensor and autofocus design.
The Pentax K-500 employs an 11-point autofocus system with 9 cross-type points and phase-detection autofocus technology, well-suited for fast and accurate focusing on moving subjects. It supports AF tracking, face detection, and live view focusing. The camera can shoot bursts at 6 frames per second, which is adequate for entry-level sports or wildlife work.
Conversely, the Panasonic ZS80 relies on a contrast-detection AF system, enhanced by depth-from-defocus technology but lacking phase detection. It has fewer focus points but incorporates face and touch AF functionality. Its burst mode shoots up to 10 fps, appealing if you want to capture moments quickly, albeit with some compromises in continuous autofocus tracking compared to phase-detection systems.
In practice, the K-500’s phase-detect AF leads in autofocus speed and accuracy, especially in dynamic situations like sports and wildlife. The ZS80’s AF, while responsive, excels more for static or slow-moving subjects where quick framing versatility is prioritized.
Versatility with Lenses: Fixed Zoom vs. Interchangeable
One of the most crucial distinctions is lens ecosystem.
The Panasonic ZS80 uses a fixed 24-720mm (35mm equivalent) lens with a 30x optical zoom and a maximum aperture ranging from f/3.3 to f/6.4. This massive zoom range is impressive, allowing you to shoot everything from wide-angle landscapes to distant wildlife without changing lenses. The macro mode focusing down to 3cm also adds close-up flexibility. However, the lens’s aperture limits low-light performance and creative depth-of-field control.
On the other hand, the Pentax K-500 enjoys compatibility with 151 Pentax KAF2 mount lenses including primes, zooms, and specialized optics. This opens up creative possibilities in portraiture, landscapes, wildlife telephoto, macro, and more. Being able to pair the camera with fast prime lenses (f/1.8 or wider) significantly enhances image quality and low-light capabilities.
If you value convenience and don’t want to fuss with lens changes, the ZS80 is the obvious choice. But for photographers wanting expansion, optical quality, or niche applications, the K-500’s interchangeable lens system is a game changer.
Real-World Photography Disciplines: Which Camera Excels Where?
To give you a sense of practical strengths, let’s break down key photography genres:
Portrait Photography
The K-500’s APS-C sensor provides better skin tone rendering, natural bokeh, and eye detection capabilities compared to the ZS80’s small sensor. With fast lenses available to maximize shallow depth of field, portraits are sharper and more artistically controlled. The ZS80 can produce decent portraits but limited aperture and digital zoom artifacts reduce quality.
Landscape Photography
Landscape fans will appreciate the K-500’s wider dynamic range and weather sealing (though limited), better RAW processing, and the ability to use wide-angle lenses. The ZS80’s ultra-wide 24mm equivalent and tilting screen aid composition, but the small sensor restricts detail capture and noise control in shadow areas.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Here’s where it gets interesting. The ZS80’s massive 30x zoom lets you capture distant action immediately, and its 10fps burst can freeze moments quickly. But autofocus lag and reduced image quality at long focal lengths are drawbacks. The K-500’s phase-detection AF and faster lens options are superior for tracking fast-moving subjects, though you might need to invest in telephoto lenses.
Street Photography
The ZS80’s compact size and quiet lens make it ideal for discreet street shooting. Its tilting screen and touch AF help capture candid moments creatively. The K-500’s bulkier profile and louder shutter may cause more notice. However, the optical viewfinder does offer a better connection to the scene.
Macro Photography
The ZS80 provides a 3cm macro focusing distance combined with image stabilization, suitable for casual close-ups. The K-500, depending on the lens used, allows for more precise and higher magnification macro shooting with better depth and resolution.
Night and Astro Photography
Low-light ISO performance tilts heavily toward the K-500, with ISO sensitivity up to 51,600 native, enabling cleaner long-exposure images of stars or nightscapes. The ZS80’s max ISO of 3200, with more noise creeping in above 800 ISO, limits its astrophotography potential.
Video Capabilities
The Panasonic ZS80 supports UHD 4K video recording at 30p, along with H.264 format and 4K photo modes, making it very versatile for casual or travel videography. Unfortunately, there is no microphone or headphone jack. The K-500 records Full HD up to 30fps, lacking 4K and external audio options. If video is a priority, the ZS80 clearly leads.
Travel Photography
Thanks to its compact size, integrated zoom, and longer battery life for casual use, the ZS80 is a perfect travel companion for those who want one camera for everything. The heavier K-500 requires carrying extra lenses to cover similar focal lengths, which can be a burden on extended trips.
Professional Usage
While the Pentax K-500 is considered entry-level, its file format support, APS-C sensor, and customizable controls make it suitable for pro workflows on a budget. The ZS80’s smaller sensor and compressed video options limit pro-grade usage.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Battery Life
Both cameras lack advanced environmental sealing - they’re not weatherproof, dustproof, or shockproof. The K-500, however, has a more robust DSLR body that can handle rougher handling better than the plastic compact of the ZS80.
Battery life is another key difference: The K-500 runs on 4 AA batteries providing approximately 710 shots per charge, which can be very convenient on the go. The ZS80 uses a proprietary battery rated for around 380 shots, meaning you’ll want spares if shooting extensively.
Connectivity and Storage
The Panasonic ZS80 shines with built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for instant image transfer and remote control via smartphone apps - features missing on the Pentax K-500, which has no built-in wireless connectivity. However, the K-500 does offer optional GPS for geotagging.
Both cameras support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, with the ZS80 supporting faster UHS-I cards, slightly benefiting burst and video recording.
Price and Value Analysis
At the time of review, the Panasonic ZS80 retails around $448, while the Pentax K-500 is priced near $600. Price-wise, the ZS80 represents excellent value for its zoom capabilities, compactness, and 4K video features. The K-500 commands a premium for its larger sensor, more rugged DSLR build, and extensive lens ecosystem.
Your choice boils down to priority: travel-friendly and all-in-one convenience vs. superior image quality and system versatility.
Summary Scores and Genre Breakdown
Here are some side-by-side sample images illustrating the real-world difference in sharpness, noise levels, and color rendition.
To sum up the performance numerically:
- Image Quality: Pentax K-500 leads
- Autofocus Speed: Pentax K-500 edges ahead for moving subjects
- Zoom Versatility: Panasonic ZS80 dominates with 30x optical zoom
- Video: Panasonic ZS80 supports 4K; Pentax limited to 1080p
- Portability: Panasonic ZS80 much more compact and lightweight
- Battery Life: Pentax K-500 lasts nearly twice as long
- Lens Options: Pentax K-500 offers far greater choices
- User Interface: Panasonic ZS80 more beginner-friendly with touchscreen
Final Thoughts: Which One’s Right for You?
If your photography lifestyle calls for a grab-and-go camera that delivers impressive zoom range, convenient touchscreen, 4K video, and wireless sharing with minimal fuss, the Panasonic Lumix ZS80 is a smart pick. It excels in street, travel, casual wildlife, and video shooting where size and flexibility matter most.
But if image quality, creative deeper control, and access to versatile lenses top your wish list, the Pentax K-500 entry-level DSLR remains compelling. Its larger APS-C sensor delivers richer detail, better low-light performance, and more nuanced photographic outcomes across portraits, landscapes, and action shooting. It’s a more traditional camera that invites you to expand into a serious system over time.
For beginners unsure about lens systems yet wanting zoom power and modern features, the ZS80 offers a seamless starting point. For enthusiasts willing to invest in lenses and prioritize long-term photographic growth, the K-500 delivers strong value and classic DSLR durability.
Whichever you pick, both cameras reflect thoughtful design geared toward different kinds of photographers. Knowing what matters most in your shooting style - and where your creativity will grow - is the key, and hopefully my detailed comparison here makes that decision clearer.
Happy shooting!
Panasonic ZS80 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 | Pentax K-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 | Pentax K-500 |
Also called as | Lumix DC-TZ95 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2018-02-18 | 2013-11-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine | PRIME M |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 51600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.60 m (with Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 327g (0.72 pounds) | 646g (1.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 69 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1087 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | 710 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $448 | $600 |