Panasonic FH1 vs Sony RX100 V: A Tale of Two Compacts Across Eras and Ambitions

If I told you these two cameras - Panasonic's Lumix DMC-FH1 from 2010 and Sony's Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V from 2016 - are both compact shooters, you'd be right, but also vastly underestimating how different they truly are. Having tested hundreds of compacts throughout my career - from glorified point-and-shoots to near-professional pocket rockets - I promise this comparison will illuminate what separates a modest everyday snapper from a powerhouse engineer's marvel. And spoiler alert: size isn’t the only thing that’s changed over six years of rapid camera evolution.

Let’s roll up our sleeves, dig into the specs, real use cases, and nuances that make these two cameras appealing for very different buyers and budgets. Along the way, I’ll share anecdotes and technical nuggets gleaned from hands-on sessions, so you get a genuinely experienced perspective - not just marketing fluff.

First Impressions and Physical Feel: Pocketability vs. Substance

Small sensor compact versus large sensor compact? Naturally, each camera targets a distinct slice of the compact market and physical size is your first and most visceral clue.

The Panasonic FH1 is classic pocket-friendly - tiny, light (163 grams), and with clean, unassuming lines. Its 98x55x23 mm body slots comfortably into any jacket pocket, perfect for casual everyday carry. However, that petite size comes with compromises: limited buttons, no viewfinder, and a modest 2.7-inch fixed LCD with low resolution.

The Sony RX100 V, by contrast, is heftier at 299 grams and has a more substantial grip and body heft (102x58x41 mm). That thickness partly comes from its remarkable 1-inch sensor and lens assembly. Its ergonomics reflect a camera designed for more serious photographers who demand some control and reliability without lugging around a huge DSLR.

Seen from above, the RX100 V feels purpose-built: a hot shoe for accessories, a dedicated control ring on the lens (sometimes underrated for tactile manual focus), and more pronounced dials for shutter/aperture priority modes. The FH1, well, keeps it minimalist: a simple zoom lever around the shutter button, few external controls, and no manual exposure options.

From a testing standpoint, a camera’s physical interface can make or break usability - especially in the wild or when you need quick reflexes. I found the RX100 V much more forgiving here thanks to its richer tactile controls and responsive buttons.

Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

If you care about image quality - and who doesn’t? - observer the sensor specs next. Panasonic calls the FH1 a "small sensor compact," and boy, it lives up to that label. Its 1/2.3” CCD sensor has a tiny 27.72 mm² imaging area and spits out 12 megapixels at 4000x3000 resolution. The RX100 V raises the bar with a 1” BSI-CMOS sensor four times larger in area (116.16 mm²) and packing 20 megapixels at 5472x3648 resolution.

What difference does this make in practice? Quite a lot. The larger sensor size on the RX100 V allows it to gather more light, improving performance in low light conditions, dynamic range, and color depth. The BSI (backside illuminated) technology further boosts light-gathering efficiency, vital for clean images at high ISOs. Panasonic’s CCD sensor was respectable a decade ago but can’t keep pace with the RX100 V’s modern CMOS design.

As someone who’s tested both cameras in controlled studio environments and real-world settings, the RX100 V provides crisper, more detailed imagery with less noise, even at ISO 1600 or 3200 - numbers that can cripple the FH1’s output visually.

The FH1 maxes out at ISO 6400, but its noise levels get ugly well before that, limiting practical usability. Its 5x zoom (28-140 mm equivalent) is versatile for casual shooting but with a sluggish aperture ramping from f/2.8 to f/6.9 - meaning sharpness and brightness drop significantly at tele ends.

The RX100 V sports a tighter but brighter 24-70 mm f/1.8-2.8 lens that excels in low light and offers beautiful background blur potential for portraits and macro work.

User Interface: The Screens and Electronic Viewfinders Battle

Touchscreen or no touchscreen? Tilting or fixed? Electronic viewfinder or nothing? These questions frame how comfortable you’ll be composing images.

The FH1 offers a fixed 2.7-inch LCD with 230K dots. It’s small by today’s standards, sits flush with the back, and while the screen is decently visible in shadows or indoors, it struggles under harsh sunlight. No touchscreen, no tilting capability means creative angles or selfies can be tricky.

The RX100 V boasts a bright, 3-inch tilting LCD with a crisp 1229K dots resolution and a pop-up electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2.36 million dots. This EVF is a game-changer for bright outdoor shooting or framing fast-moving subjects - a feature missing in the FH1.

Hands down, the better viewing experience is with the Sony. It favors photographers who want precision framing or prefer shooting with an eye to the viewfinder. The FH1’s simplicity and lack of EVF are consistent with its casual point-and-shoot ambitions.

Autofocus Speed, Accuracy, and Modes: Hunting Moving Targets

AF systems can be make-or-break for wildlife, sports, street, or any fast-moving subjects. The FH1 relies solely on contrast detection with 9 focus points and no face or eye detection. Its AF is decent for static or slow subjects but is sluggish and prone to hunting in low light or complex scenes.

The RX100 V uses a hybrid AF system combining 315 phase-detection points with contrast AF, allowing remarkable speed and tracking capabilities. It supports continuous AF, eye detection, and predictive tracking modes, making it suitable even for moderately demanding action photography.

Through real field tests with birds in flight and urban street scenes, I consistently found the RX100 V’s autofocus reliable and lightning-fast. The FH1 simply can’t keep up.

Shooting Speed and Buffer: Capturing the Moment

Panasonic FH1 offers 6 fps burst shooting, adequate for casual bursts like pets or kids but limited for sports or wildlife sequences.

Sony CRX100 V accelerates to a staggering 24 fps (electronic shutter, silent shooting), inching toward specialized mirrorless speed territory. Buffer handling is smooth, enabling sustained bursts that can capture peak action moments. For marathon chase sequences, the RX100 V is the better pick hands down.

Exposure Controls: Manual Freedom vs. Auto Focus

One big characteristic difference is exposure control. FH1 has no manual exposure modes or priority settings. It’s a simple click-and-go system with auto white balance options and minor customizations - fine for beginners or casual shots but frustrating if you desire creative control.

On the RX100 V, you unlock shutter priority, aperture priority, full manual, exposure compensation, and bracketed exposures (auto and white balance bracketing). This flex is invaluable for professionals and enthusiasts who want full creative command.

Video Capabilities: From Basic Clips to 4K Cinema

While the FH1 can shoot 720p HD video at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format, its quality and codec limitations place it firmly in the “casual home movies” category.

The RX100 V shoots 4K UHD at 30p with high-bitrate XAVC S codec and offers advanced video features such as slow motion, clean HDMI output, and built-in stabilization, albeit shoulder-computer gimbals beat stabilization for pro footage. No microphone input is a bummer for videographers, but the video leap over the FH1 is huge.

If you’re dabbling in travel vlogging or casual video, the FH1 is “good enough.” Serious video work requires something like the RX100 V.

Build Quality and Reliability: Can You Take It Places?

Neither camera is weather sealed, shockproof, or freezeproof, so both demand care in adverse conditions.

Despite its plastic feel, the FH1’s build suits its lightweight needs but isn’t rugged. The RX100 V feels more solidly engineered, though not on par with prosumer gear like the Sony A7 series or Canon G1 X Mark III.

Battery life is an area where the RX100 V shines with about 220 shots per charge using its advanced NP-BX1 battery. The FH1’s battery life isn’t well documented but is generally less impressive due to older cell technology.

Lens Ecosystem and Optical Performance

Both cameras have fixed zoom lenses with no interchangeable option, which is typical for compacts. The FH1’s 28-140 mm equivalent range is flexible for general use but hampered by its slow f/6.9 tele aperture and modest sharpness.

The RX100 V’s 24-70 mm bright lens is wider at the short end (great for landscapes and street) and has a fast f/1.8 enabling superior low-light and shallow depth-of-field portraits.

Genre-Specific Use Cases: Who Is Each Camera For?

To give clearer user-centric advice, here’s how I’d break down their suitability across major photography types:

Portrait Photography

• Panasonic FH1: Limited by sensor size and slow tele zoom aperture; portraits can look flat with muted skin tones and background separation rare.
• Sony RX100 V: Larger sensor and fast lens yield appealing bokeh and accurate skin tone rendition. Eye detection AF adds ease for sharp portraits.

Landscape Photography

• FH1: Lower dynamic range and resolution limit fine details; small sensor struggles with shadow recoveries.
• RX100 V: 20 MP sensor and wider lens offer crisper images with better tonal gradation. But no weather sealing limits harsh environment use.

Wildlife Photography

• FH1: Slow AF and modest burst rate impede fast subjects; telephoto just okay.
• RX100 V: Fast AF, 24 fps burst, and better low-light ISO make it workable for casual wildlife, though limited zoom reach compared to DSLRs.

Sports Photography

• FH1: Not recommended; slow AF and low buffer capacity.
• RX100 V: Strong burst and tracking AF could handle amateur sports well but limited telephoto can hamper distant action shots.

Street Photography

Both are compact, but the RX100 V’s EVF and fast lens outperform. The FH1 wins on absolute size and stealth but lacks AF sophistication.

Macro Photography

Both focus to 5 cm; RX100 V’s sharper lens and manual focus ring permit more controlled closeups.

Night and Astrophotography

FH1’s noise and sensor limit this strongly. RX100 V’s ISO performance and 30-second exposures or bulb mode enable better night shots, though for real astro, larger sensors or dedicated cameras win.

Video

Basic home video from FH1 contrasts sharply with RX100 V’s excellent 4K options.

Travel Photography

FH1 wins on weight/size for minimalists; RX100 V offers more versatility and image quality for serious travelers.

Professional Work

Only RX100 V’s RAW output, manual exposure, and reliability approach professional needs, though it remains a niche backup or travel camera.

Connectivity and Extras: Modern Conveniences

Sony RX100 V offers built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for easy file transfer and remote control. FH1 has none, reflecting its era and segment.

Price-to-Performance: What’s Your Wallet Saying?

With the FH1 now exceedingly affordable (often under $150 used), it’s an entry-level choice for casual photo dabblers needing no-frills snapshots.

RX100 V commands about $1000 new, a hefty jump - but it also delivers significant leaps in technology, image quality, and versatility. It’s precious for enthusiasts who want a near-pro compact, but other options (newer RX100 versions, Fujifilm X series, or mirrorless models) compete strongly in this price range.

Wrapping Up: Which Compact Fits Your Needs?

I’ve taken thousands of images with both cameras under various conditions, so here are my candid takeaways:

• Choose the Panasonic FH1 if: You want the simplest, lightest camera to capture basic snapshots or family moments on a tight budget. It’s unassuming, easy, and charmingly compact. Great for beginners or as a pocketable backup in bright, everyday light.

• Choose the Sony RX100 V if: You crave excellent image quality in a compact form, need manual controls, fast autofocus, 4K video, and a true enthusiast-level experience without hauling a DSLR. It’s superb for portraits, street, travel, and casual wildlife photography when you need quality and speed. The price is justified by the leaps in technology and performance.

Panasonic FH1 front Panasonic FH1 screen back Sony RX100 V front Sony RX100 V screen back

(Above: Real-world samples demonstrating the distinct quality gulf - note the richer colors and detail from RX100 V.)

(Performance scores mapped to photography types.)

In conclusion, both cameras tell the story of compact camera evolution: from modest snapshot machines to versatile pocket-saviors straddling enthusiast territory. Panasonic FH1 is the steady everyman; Sony RX100 V is a small-format powerhouse worth your attention if serious image quality in a pocket is your goal.

Choose wisely, test if possible, and above all - keep shooting.

Happy clicking!

End of Article