Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 vs Ricoh CX1: A Veteran Compact Camera Face-Off

In the ever-evolving landscape of digital compact cameras, a pair from the cusp of the last decade still hold modest appeal for entry-level users or those seeking a pocket-friendly backup: the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 and the Ricoh CX1. Both carve out a niche as small sensor compacts launched in 2009–2010, targeting casual shooters who want a step up from smartphone snappers without breaking the bank or packing bulky gear. But with overlapping features and slightly different design philosophies, which of these deserves a spot in your camera bag?

Having spent countless hours (and thousands of shutter clicks) testing cameras well beyond these models, my goal here is to cut through the specs parade and marketing glitz to offer you a genuine, hands-on comparison. I'll walk you through their real-world strengths and weaknesses across key photography disciplines while parsing technical nuances so you know exactly what you’re getting - no hype, just hard-earned insights.

Let’s dive in, starting where your hands will meet the metal.

Fit In Your Pocket, But How Comfortable? Ergonomics and Handling Insights

Size matters. Not just in sensor dimensions or megapixels, but in how the camera feels when you extend it to shoot. Both the Panasonic FH22 and Ricoh CX1 are true compacts, roughly fitting in a large pocket or small bag. The FH22 measures 100 x 57 x 27mm, weighing a light 170 grams, while the CX1 is a hair larger and heavier at 102 x 58 x 28mm and 180 grams.

When holding them, the FH22 offers a subtly rounded chassis with slightly grippier plastics - a boon for stability when shooting one-handed, especially outdoors or on the move. The CX1, with its more minimalist and boxy silhouette, feels a bit less secure to my fingers but compensates with slightly more deliberate button spacing.

On top, both cameras forgo an electronic viewfinder (a common concession in this class), relying instead on their LCDs for framing. The FH22 integrates a touchscreen interface, a feature not common at the time and absent in the CX1, which relies solely on physical buttons. This touchscreen adds a modern touch to the FH22, letting you focus and shoot with just a tap, which I found especially handy for quick snapshots or low-angle compositions.

Looking at the top controls, the FH22 sports slightly larger shutter buttons with a well-damped zoom lever. The CX1’s controls feel a bit stiffer, and without a touchscreen, menu navigation requires more button mashing. For someone who values quick, intuitive operation, the Panasonic clearly has the edge here.

Ergonomics scorecard: Panasonic FH22 feels more modern and user-friendly. Ricoh CX1 is no slouch but leans traditional.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras sit atop a small 1/2.3-inch sensor platform common in compacts of their era, but there are subtle differences worth noting. Panasonic’s FH22 opts for a 14-megapixel CCD sensor, while the Ricoh CX1 integrates a 9-megapixel CMOS sensor. You might immediately think the higher megapixel count on the FH22 equals better detail, but it’s not that simple.

CCD sensors were once favored for their image quality, particularly in color rendition and low noise at base ISOs, albeit at the expense of increased power consumption and slower readout speeds. CMOS sensors, more common in recent years, generally offer faster performance including better video capabilities and lower power use.

In testing images side-by-side, the FH22’s higher megapixel count did deliver a slight advantage in fine detail resolution when shooting stills in well-lit conditions - think slightly crisper textures in landscapes and sharper text. However, this came paired with a narrower ISO range capped at 6400 max and a tendency towards more noise beyond ISO 400.

The CX1’s fewer pixels translated to bigger individual photodiodes with better light-gathering capability, resulting in cleaner images at higher ISO settings (up to ISO 1600 max). My low-light tests showed the CX1 producing more usable shots in dim environments with less grain, albeit at the cost of softer image detail.

Both cameras have anti-aliasing filters to suppress moiré for smooth images, but that slightly compromises the FH22’s extra resolution advantage.

To any enthusiast wondering about RAW: neither camera supports RAW capture, which limits post-processing freedom - a significant consideration if you value extensive image editing. They focus on generating JPEGs optimized by their in-camera engines.

Practical takeaway: For pixel-peepers shooting in bright light, the Panasonic FH22 offers a higher resolution edge. For casual shooters needing better high-ISO performance and cleaner images in mixed lighting, the higher quality CMOS sensor on the Ricoh CX1 may be preferable.

Viewing and Framing: How the Screens Stack Up

Without eye-level viewfinders, the LCD screens are your primary window into composition. Panasonic and Ricoh both equip their compacts with three-inch displays, but the quality gap is startling when viewing in side-by-side comparisons.

The FH22’s touchscreen has a modest resolution of 230k pixels. It’s serviceable but feels a bit grainy and washed out under harsh sunlight - even with slight brightness tweaks. Still, the touchscreen adds a tactile advantage, letting me refocus or snap shots with a tap, which noticeably speeds up workflow in casual shooting.

The Ricoh CX1 boasts a much sharper LCD panel at 920k dots. This results in crisp, vivid previews that more closely reflect final image quality. During field tests in bright sunlight, I could assess exposure and sharpness with greater confidence. However, since it lacks a touchscreen, focusing and setting adjustments rely on buttons, which can slow rapid-fire moments.

Neither camera offers an articulating screen, which restricts creative angles or selfie use - a minor gripe but something to keep in mind if you often shoot video or vlogging-style content.

In sum: Ricoh CX1 wins on screen clarity and visibility; Panasonic FH22 charms with touchscreen convenience.

Autofocus and Shooting Responsiveness: Speed Matters

When it comes to capturing fleeting moments - whether street photography or wildlife - the autofocus system’s speed and accuracy make all the difference. Both cameras implement basic contrast-detection autofocus systems with 9 focus points (FH22) or unspecified count on the CX1, reflecting their entry-level pedigree.

Hands-on tests reveal the FH22’s autofocus hunts a bit more frequently in low light or low-contrast scenes, sometimes frustratingly missing quick subjects. Its 5 frames per second continuous shooting rate is respectable but hampered by slow buffer clearing and lack of continuous autofocus tracking.

The CX1 has no stated continuous shooting rate, and in practice, burst mode is slower - closer to 1-2 fps - with focus locked on the first frame. But its autofocus, though less complex, felt more reliable in daylight thanks to faster convergence times on mid-contrast subjects.

Neither camera offers face detection or eye autofocus, so portrait shooting requires a bit more patience and manual zooming in to check focus accuracy.

Bottom line: Both autofocus systems are basic and best suited to still scenes or slow-moving subjects. For action photography, neither will keep pace with modern compacts or MILCs, but the Panasonic might edge ahead slightly for burst shooting if speed is your primary concern.

Zoom Lenses: Versatility for Every Scenario?

Panasonic FH22 rocks an 8x optical zoom lens spanning 28-224mm equivalent focal length, while Ricoh CX1 sports a slightly shorter 7.1x zoom ranging 28-200mm equivalent.

Practically, that extra reach on the Panasonic matters if you plan to shoot distant details like wildlife or souvenirs on travel. The zoom quality on both is, predictably, middle-of-the-road with some softness and chromatic aberrations at full telephoto. Aperture varies from f/3.3-5.9 on the FH22 and f/3.3-5.2 on the CX1, giving the Ricoh a slight edge in low light at long zoom settings.

Both cameras support macro capabilities, but here the CX1 truly shines: with a minimum focusing distance of just 1cm, versus 5cm on Panasonic, it allows you to capture impressive close-up compositions with dramatic detail. This makes the Ricoh an ideal choice for nature enthusiasts and hobbyists enamored with tiny subjects.

Shooting Across Photography Genres: How Do They Perform?

Here I’ll sift through my real-world tests spanning various photographic disciplines to see where each camera pulls ahead or falls short.

Portraits - Skin Tones and Background Blur

Neither camera offers aperture priority or manual exposure modes, limiting creative control over depth of field. With maximum apertures hovering around f/3.3-5.9, neither can super impressively separate subjects from backgrounds. Both depend heavily on zoom and distance to manipulate bokeh.

Skin tone reproduction was a toss-up; the Panasonic’s CCD sensor rendered slightly warmer, more natural tones, while the Ricoh’s CMOS showed a cooler cast needing mild white balance adjustments in post.

Absent face or eye detect autofocus means you’ll want to be precise and patient when focusing on eyes - manual zoom preview modes come in handy here.

Landscapes - Dynamic Range and Resolution

For landscapes, the Panasonic FH22’s higher resolution and sharper details give it a modest advantage - particularly in good light where image noise is minimal. However, both cameras’ small sensors constrain overall dynamic range, resulting in loss of shadow and highlight details compared to larger-sensor cameras.

Neither body sports weather sealing, so rugged outdoor shooting requires caution. Both lenses show moderate distortion, easily corrected with post-processing.

Wildlife - Telephoto Reach and Autofocus Speed

Wildlife photographers will appreciate the Panasonic’s longer zoom reach but may find autofocus sluggish in tracking fast-moving animals. The CX1’s lens is a fraction shorter but autofocus was occasionally more reliable in good light.

Neither model supports burst autofocus tracking, so expect many missed shots if subjects move rapidly.

Sports - Frame Rates and Tracking

Sports photography demands fast frame rates and advanced autofocus tracking - both areas where these compacts unequivocally underwhelm. The Panasonic’s 5 fps continuous burst is a silver lining but without continuous AF tracking, it’s impractical for anything but slow action.

Ricoh’s lack of high burst rates and autofocus modes effectively rules it out for sports use.

Street Photography - Low Light and Discreetness

Compact size makes both cameras street friendly, with quick start-up times and decent control layouts. The FH22’s touchscreen enables faster on-the-fly focusing, an asset for candid moments.

Ricoh’s sharper LCD aids framing in tricky lighting but slower controls can hamper spontaneity.

Low-light performance overall favors Ricoh’s CMOS sensor and slightly faster lens aperture at telephoto.

Macro - Magnification and Precision

Macro enthusiasts will find the Ricoh CX1 preferable due to that tiny 1cm minimum focus distance, allowing striking close-ups that the FH22 cannot match.

Night and Astro - ISO Performance and Exposure Options

Both cameras shoot limited video with maximum resolution capped at HD or SD, so video isn’t a strong suit here.

Night photography using high ISO modes was better on the Ricoh CX1 due to lower noise levels, though ISO ceilings were modest.

Neither offers bulb mode or manual exposure controls, limiting astro-photography creativity.

Video - Recording Features and Stabilization

Both capture video in motion JPEG, an outdated format yielding large files and limited editing flexibility.

The FH22 can shoot 720p at 30fps, while the CX1 maxes out at 640x480 - an appreciable limitation for video enthusiasts.

Neither have external microphone jacks or HDMI output, limiting professional video workflows.

Both include image stabilization - optical on the Panasonic and sensor-shift on Ricoh - helpful for moderate handheld video.

Travel - Versatility, Battery Life, Size

Portability is a strong suit for both cameras, but the FH22’s touchscreen and longer zoom lend versatility for travel scenes ranging from landscapes to close architecture shots.

Battery life specs aren’t provided for either model, but personal tests showed both are roughly equal, requiring spare batteries if shooting over extended trips.

Professional Use and Workflow Integration

Despite their merits, neither camera targets professional photographers. Lack of RAW file support, modest sensor sizes, limited manual controls, and basic connectivity options effectively rule them out for serious workflows.

Connectivity-wise, there’s no Wi-Fi, NFC, or Bluetooth on either, limiting remote control or swift sharing capabilities now common in modern cameras.

Lens Ecosystem and Expandability

Both are fixed-lens compacts - no option to swap lenses. Some might see this as a drawback, but it simplifies use for casual shooters or travelers wanting an all-in-one solution.

Build and Durability

No weather sealing or rugged features on either. Both require gentle handling and protection from dust and moisture.

Value Assessment: Price-to-Performance Ratio

At original retail prices, the Panasonic FH22 typically retailed around $200, while the Ricoh CX1 fetched about $300.

Given its sharper LCD, better macro close-up, cleaner high-ISO results, and superior sensor efficiency, the Ricoh CX1 offers reasonable justification for its higher price tag to enthusiasts seeking image quality and usability.

The Panasonic FH22’s strengths lie in touchscreen convenience and longer zoom reach, potentially appealing to users prioritizing versatility and ease of use over ultimate image fidelity.

Visual Gallery: Sample Images and Scores

Panasonic FH22 front Panasonic FH22 screen back Ricoh CX1 front Ricoh CX1 screen back

From landscapes to close-ups, the FH22’s higher resolution is easy to spot in daylight shots, but Ricoh’s images hold up better in shadowed, indoor scenes.

Final Thoughts: Who Should Pick Which?

At the end of the day, both cameras offer surprisingly capable and sometimes charming experiences given their entry-level price and age - worthy of consideration if found at bargain prices.

Pick the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 if you want:

• A longer 8x zoom lens for travel versatility
• A touchscreen interface for faster focus and shooting
• Higher megapixel count for detailed daylight shots
• Slightly lighter and more ergonomic body

Choose the Ricoh CX1 if you value:

• Superior image quality in low light and high ISO shots
• Crisp and bright LCD screen for confident composition
• Outstanding macro photography capabilities with 1cm minimum focus distance
• Reliable sensor-shift image stabilization

Neither camera is designed to replace serious DSLRs or mirrorless systems but serve as solid companions for casual photography fans, travelers on a budget, or as entry points into dedicated cameras beyond smartphones.

Wrapping Up With a Camera-Savvy Smile

Revisiting these compacts was a fun throwback - akin to flipping through photo albums from a simpler era. Neither the Panasonic FH22 nor Ricoh CX1 will win any awards for innovation today, but they reveal how thoughtful designs can still deliver joy and utility.

If your budget or purpose steers you toward this class, lean into what each camera does best rather than expecting modern tech miracles. And remember, photography is equal parts art and gear - so seize the moment with whatever you can get your hands on!

Happy shooting - may your images always be sharp and your batteries never die mid-frame!

(End of article.)