Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung SL102
94 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Panasonic FH22 and Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Panasonic and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the FH22 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FH22 was manufactured 13 months later than the SL102 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the FH22 scores vs the SL102 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are available at Panasonic FH22 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Samsung SL102
| FH22 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 13 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Panasonic FH22
| SL102 | FH22 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic FH22 and Samsung SL102
| FH22 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FH22 provides exterior measurements of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic FH22 and Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the FH22 against the SL102.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FH22 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The visual below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the FH22 and SL102.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Panasonic FH22 to render extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer FH22 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Panasonic FH22 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-FS33 | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 170 gr (0.37 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $200 | $130 |
