Panasonic FH25 vs Sony QX100
94 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33


92 Imaging
50 Features
44 Overall
47
Panasonic FH25 vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS35
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Launched September 2013

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100: A Detailed Hands-On Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing your next camera can feel like navigating a maze of confusing specs and marketing jargon. Having put thousands of cameras through the paces over more than 15 years, I prefer a down-to-earth, practical analysis - one that highlights how these cameras behave behind the lens in real-world shooting scenarios. Today, I’m putting the 2011 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 side-by-side with the 2013 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 - two very different cameras from the compact and lens-style categories, yet both marketed as portable, enthusiast-friendly options.
Let’s peel back the specs and see which camera suits your distinct photography needs. I’ll cover everything from sensor tech and autofocus to ergonomics, image quality, and genre-specific performance. By the end, you’ll know exactly which camera deserves a spot in your kit.
Size and Handling: Compact Convenience vs. Lens-Style Creativity
Physical feel and control layout often make or break the shooting experience, especially in spontaneous situations like street or travel photography.
Starting with size and ergonomics, the Panasonic FH25 is a traditional compact camera design - small, approachable, and pocketable with dimensions of 99 x 57 x 28 mm and a weight of just 159 grams. Meanwhile, the Sony QX100 is quite unconventional; essentially a lens-style camera module measuring 63 x 63 x 56 mm and weighing 179 grams, it’s designed to pair with your smartphone, relying on your phone’s screen and controls.
In-hand, the FH25 feels comfortable thanks to its rectangular form with a modest grip area, making one-handed operation straightforward. The QX100, however, feels more like a bulky lens barrel without a traditional body - gripping it without your phone attached can be awkward.
The FH25’s more traditional design includes dedicated physical buttons, whereas the QX100 depends heavily on touchscreen controls through your phone, which can introduce slight latency but offers greater customization and a larger, clearer preview.
Looking down from the top, the FH25 packs a decent array of buttons and a zoom toggle, while the QX100 offers minimal physical controls aside from a shutter release and zoom rocker - both are simple but give you very different tactile experiences.
In summary: if you value compactness and tactile feedback in a pocket-friendly camera, the FH25 wins. But for those embracing smartphone integration and a modular approach, the QX100’s lens-style ergonomics present an innovative, if niche, option.
Sensor and Image Quality: Size Matters More Than You’d Think
Image quality is the ultimate decider. To break it down, understanding sensor technology and resolution is key - and here the QX100 pulls decisively ahead.
The Panasonic FH25 sports a modest 1/2.3" CCD sensor, measuring roughly 6.08 x 4.56 mm (~27.72 mm² sensor area) with a 16MP resolution. In contrast, the Sony QX100 houses a much larger 1" Exmor BSI-CMOS sensor, measuring 13.2 x 8.8 mm (~116.16 mm²) and delivering 20MP - nearly four times the surface area.
Larger sensors generally produce cleaner images with better dynamic range and low-light performance due to larger pixel sizes and superior light-gathering capabilities. The QX100’s 1” sensor gives it a clear advantage over the smaller FH25 sensor in terms of detail retention, noise control at higher ISOs, and color depth. This difference is especially noticeable in challenging lighting conditions.
Resolution-wise, although the QX100 has more megapixels (20MP vs. 16MP), the real gain is in pixel quality and overall image fidelity, thanks partly to the BSI CMOS design and absence of an antialiasing compromise.
When shooting in daylight, the FH25 captures decent images and serves well for casual snapshots, but its CCD sensor shows more noise creeping in beyond ISO 400 and tends to clip highlights earlier. The QX100 handles highlights and shadows more gracefully, maintaining texture in clouds and foliage even in high-contrast landscapes.
In portraiture, the larger sensor’s depth of field control creates a more pronounced background blur (bokeh), allowing you to isolate subjects smoothly even at modest telephoto reach.
If sharpness and image quality are your top priorities - especially for printing or pixel-peeping - the QX100’s sensor clearly delivers.
Lens and Optics: Zoom Range Meets Fast Aperture
Let’s talk about glass - your lens dictates framing, perspective, and much of the optical character.
The Panasonic FH25 comes with an 8x optical zoom lens ranging from 28-224mm equivalent, with apertures varying from f/3.3 at wide to f/5.9 at telephoto. On paper, this gives you versatile reach for casual portraits, landscapes, and even some wildlife snapshots when subjects are not too distant.
The Sony QX100 sports a 3.6x zoom range of 28-100mm equivalent - but crucially, with a faster f/1.8-4.9 aperture. This wider aperture at the short end means you get more light in and better low-light capabilities, plus more control over depth of field.
Comparing the two, think of the FH25 as your go-to all-rounder with extensive zoom reach but slower lenses, whereas the QX100 is more specialized - offering brighter optics that excel at short telephoto portraits and low-light shooting but lacking the extended zoom.
The QX100’s ability to deliver sharp corner-to-corner images, combined with that relatively fast lens, makes it outstanding for shooting portraits with creamy bokeh and fine detail.
Macro enthusiasts will find both cameras can focus as close as 5 cm, but the QX100’s manual focus ring (a rarity in pocketable tools) allows for more precise focusing control, an advantage for creative macro work.
Autofocus Systems and Speed: Which Camera Fires First?
For many photographers, autofocus performance can make or break a shot - no matter how good the sensor or optics.
The Panasonic FH25 utilizes contrast-detection autofocus with 11 selectable focus points and face detection. It offers face tracking but lacks continuous AF for moving subjects. Its AF speed is modest, adequate for static scenes, but you’ll find a slight lag when shooting action or fast-moving street scenes.
The Sony QX100, meanwhile, also depends on contrast-detection AF but is controlled through your smartphone app with touch autofocus and face detection as well. It adds manual focus control via a ring on the lens - a thoughtful addition.
Importantly, neither camera is optimized for continuous autofocus tracking like you’d find on professional models, so sports or wildlife photographers relying on quick and accurate AF will experience limitations.
Still, in practical terms: the FH25 turns focus reasonably quickly for snapshots, while the smartphone interface of the QX100 introduces minor latency delays but offers more precise focus with manual override.
Viewing and Interface: LCDs, Screens, and Controls
Let’s look at how you compose and review your images - critical in the field.
The Panasonic FH25 sports a 2.7-inch fixed TFT LCD with just 230k dots resolution. It’s small by today’s standards and somewhat dim in bright daylight, but better than nothing for framing shots. The lack of a viewfinder or touchscreen means you’ll rely entirely on this modest LCD.
The Sony QX100 has no built-in screen of any kind; instead, you pair it with your smartphone via Wi-Fi, and the phone’s display serves as the live viewfinder and control panel. This design enables a large, high-resolution viewing experience dependent on your phone’s screen quality, but only if you have a compatible phone and secure connection.
While the touchscreen interaction is modern and customizable, it can be cumbersome in bright outdoor conditions or when smartphone battery level limits shooting time. Also, constant reliance on a paired device means you’re vulnerable to connectivity glitches.
For photographers preferring a standalone camera setup without dependencies, the FH25’s integrated screen - although basic - feels more reliable and less fiddly.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations for Extended Shoots
In the field, battery endurance determines how long you keep shooting.
The Panasonic FH25 offers around 250 shots per charge with its rechargeable battery pack - not exceptional but suitable for casual day trips. It stores images on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards.
The Sony QX100, despite being smaller, offers about 200 shots per charge, slightly less than the Panasonic. It uses microSD and Memory Stick Micro cards, which are less common. More importantly, continuous use of Wi-Fi and smartphone connectivity tends to drain both the companion device and camera battery faster in practice.
Neither camera supports dual cards or USB power delivery, which is a downside for long photo walks or professional assignments.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: How Tough Are They?
Neither camera is weather-sealed or physically rugged. Both are built primarily from plastic, aimed at casual use rather than harsh environmental conditions.
If you’re a landscape or nature photographer frequently shooting outdoors in variable weather, consider protective measures such as camera rain covers or alternative camera choices.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
The Panasonic FH25’s fixed lens offers no scope for interchangeability - typical of compacts. The Sony QX100 is also fixed lens but integrates with smartphones, turning your phone into a versatile camera body; however, the lens itself cannot be swapped either.
If you crave system expandability, neither camera fits the bill.
Video Capabilities: From Casual Clips to Creative Expression
Video lovers, take note:
The Panasonic FH25 shoots 720p HD video at 24 fps with Motion JPEG format, but lacks advanced movie modes or external microphone input.
The Sony QX100 offers full HD 1080p recording at 30 fps in MPEG-4 format via smartphone control. The frame rates and codec options are better for casual video but fall short of professional expectations. Neither camera supports 4K or external audio inputs.
Both cameras provide basic autofocus during video and built-in optical stabilization, which helps reduce handheld shake.
How They Perform Across Photography Disciplines
To give you a comprehensive sense of each camera’s strengths, here’s how they shake out across popular photographic genres:
-
Portraiture: The QX100’s larger sensor, fast lens, and manual focus ring edge out the FH25, producing cleaner skin tones and smoother bokeh. Face detection is present on both but sharper results occur on the Sony.
-
Landscape: The QX100 again leads due to superior dynamic range and resolution. The FH25’s modest sensor and lens combo limit detail and tonal gradation.
-
Wildlife: Neither camera is ideal. The FH25’s extended telephoto helps slightly, but autofocus speed and continuous shooting limitations hinder capturing fast action.
-
Sports: Fast-paced action proves challenging for both, but the FH25's 4 fps burst rate and simple AF system falls short compared to dedicated sport cameras.
-
Street: The FH25’s compact form factor wins for quick, discreet shooting. The Sony QX100 can be cumbersome without your phone, though remote shooting via phone allows creative angles.
-
Macro: Close focus is similar, but the QX100’s manual focus ring allows more precise control.
-
Night/Astro: Larger sensor and brighter lens of the QX100 offer better low-light and high ISO capabilities.
-
Video: The QX100’s 1080p recording outperforms the FH25’s 720p, though both are basic.
-
Travel: FH25 is easier to carry around, but the QX100 offers better image quality for highlights and memories cherished later.
-
Professional Work: Neither camera targets pro photographer requirements; lack of RAW support and advanced controls limit post-processing and workflow.
Overall Performance and Ratings
Bringing it all together:
The Sony QX100’s sensor advantages and image quality place it clearly ahead, unlike traditional compacts like the Panasonic FH25 that deliver more limited performance but better versatility with zoom and standalone functionality.
Pricing and Value: What You Get for Your Money
At roughly $179, the Panasonic FH25 is an affordable entry point for casual shooters seeking a simple zoom compact without smartphone dependency.
The Sony QX100 retails around $268, reflecting its larger sensor, brighter lens, and smartphone integration. Although pricier, it offers a step up in image quality and creative control.
Neither represents today's cutting-edge tech, but as budget-conscious or secondary cameras, they each have merit.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
So, which camera should you pick? Here’s a quick breakdown as per user priorities:
-
For casual snapshots, travel, street photography, and those favoring compact simplicity: The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 is a reliable, pocket-friendly choice - especially if you want an all-in-one camera ready to shoot out of the box without connecting to any devices.
-
For enthusiasts prioritizing image quality, portraiture, low-light shooting, and fun smartphone integration: The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 shines with its 1" sensor, fast lenses, and manual focus options. If you already have a capable smartphone and want to boost your photography creatively, it’s a compelling companion.
-
Avoid either camera for serious sports, wildlife, or professional work where high-speed autofocus, buffering, RAW capture, or weather sealing are must-haves.
Both cameras represent interesting slices of camera technology from their respective years. The FH25 is a solid budget compact; the QX100 is a peek at modular shooting evolution.
If I were forced to recommend one for modern use, the QX100’s superior sensor and lens would win me over for most photographic scenarios, provided I don’t mind attaching a phone.
I hope this detailed analysis helps you make an informed choice! If you’re curious about specific genres or want to dive deeper into testing methods, feel free to reach out or check my full video review for side-by-side real-world tests.
Happy shooting!
Panasonic FH25 vs Sony QX100 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
Also called | Lumix DMC-FS35 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2013-09-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine VI | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | - |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Screen LCD | Depends on connected smartphone |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | None |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lb) | 179 grams (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photos | 200 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $180 | $268 |