Panasonic FP2 vs Sony A290: A Real-World Photographic Showdown

In the grand theater of photography gear, the choice between ultracompact convenience and entry-level DSLR power often ignites spirited debates among enthusiasts and professionals alike. Today, we’re pitting two cameras from 2010 - Panasonic’s diminutive Lumix DMC-FP2 and Sony’s modestly priced Alpha DSLR-A290 - against each other in an extensive, hands-on comparison. Both launched at the dawn of their decade, they aim at completely different user priorities and budgets, but how do their real-world performances stack up? Over some extended testing sessions, I've tried to decode which scenarios each camera thrives in, and where compromises might sting.

Let’s begin with the general canvas before zooming (pun intended) into the more nuanced details.

Size Matters - Or Does It?

First impressions are often tactile, and when I hefted the Panasonic FP2, its pocket-friendly form factor immediately charmed me. At just 99 x 59 x 19 mm and a feather-light 151 grams, it epitomizes the idea of “grab and go.” In contrast, the Sony A290 is a compact SLR with dimensions of 128 x 97 x 86 mm and weight tipping the scales at 549 grams - considerably larger and heavier, as to be expected for an entry-level DSLR.

In practical terms, the FP2 is perfect for travel and street photographers who value discretion and lightness. It slips into a jacket pocket without notice. The A290, while still smaller than pro DSLRs, demands a dedicated bag or at least a roomy shoulder strap.

Despite the bulk, the Sony’s larger grip and sturdier feel deliver far better ergonomics, especially for longer shoots. When experimenting with the FP2, I found its minimalistic body somewhat limiting - buttons are tiny, and there’s no dedicated grip area. Extended handheld shooting in challenging light quickly becomes a test of stamina.

Controls: Intuitive or Intimidating?

Let’s peek from above to see who wins the design/layout battle. A compact camera often sacrifices controls for simplicity, whereas DSLRs tend to offer a wealth of buttons and dials for fast, precise adjustments.

The FP2’s top plate is uncluttered, with just a shutter release and zoom lever. Its Venus Engine IV processor offers automated shooting modes - with almost no room for manual overrides. If you delight in tweaking apertures, shutter speeds, and ISO on the fly, you’ll be frustrated by the FP2’s limited interface.

On the flip side, the A290 sports a traditional DSLR cockpit: command dials, mode dial, dedicated exposure compensation button, and even manual exposures. This is a huge boon for enthusiasts wanting fast, tactile control - no menu diving needed for most common adjustments. The 9-point autofocus system is also accessible via physical buttons, which is a blessing in fast-paced photography.

Sensor and Image Quality Insights

Image quality boils down largely to sensor performance and lens optics, so let’s scrutinize these fundamentals. The FP2 employs a 1/2.3" CCD sensor measuring 6.08 x 4.56 mm with 14 megapixels. Tiny by DSLR standards, with a sensor area of roughly 27.7 mm². In contrast, the A290 boasts a 14 MP APS-C sized CCD sensor (23.5 x 15.7 mm, about 369 mm²). That’s an order of magnitude larger in area - an enormous advantage in light-gathering capability and dynamic range.

In practice, this translates directly into striking differences. Shooting landscapes in golden hour light, the A290’s APS-C sensor yields photographs with richer tonal gradation, noticeably better shadow recovery, and deeper color depth. The FP2's small sensor struggles to cope with bright skies juxtaposed with shaded foregrounds, often succumbing to blown highlights and noisy shadows.

The FP2’s fixed lens covers a 35-140mm equivalent focal range with a slow maximum aperture varying from f/3.5 to f/5.9. It suffices for general travel snapshots but is handicapped in low light or creating lush bokeh backgrounds. The A290, capable of using any Sony/Minolta Alpha mount lens - including a host of fast primes and zooms - wins hands down for image quality and creative flexibility.

If you’re a pixel peeper, the A290’s RAW file support (not found on the FP2) gives vast latitude for post-processing. The FP2 shoots only JPEGs, limiting recoverability and fine-tuning options. For archival photography or professional work, the A290 is the obvious choice.

Live View, Viewfinder, and Screen Experience

Neither camera offers touchscreen capabilities or articulating screens, standard fare for their era, but they differ notably in viewfinding.

The FP2 is a strictly live view camera - the only framing aid is its fixed 2.7-inch LCD (230k dots). The lack of a viewfinder means shooting in bright outdoor conditions can be problematic, with glare and reflections making composition tricky.

The Sony A290, with its optical pentamirror viewfinder, covers 95% of the frame at 0.55x magnification. That pentamirror isn’t top-tier compared to pricier DSLRs, but it still offers a stable, immediate framing experience free from lag or screen glare.

Both share a basic 2.7-inch screen at 230k pixels for image review, which feels quaint by today’s standards but was adequate in 2010.

Personally, I found the A290’s optical viewfinder transformative for controlled photography - accurate framing, easy focusing, and battery-efficient. The FP2’s live view-only approach feels limiting, especially for wildlife or sports where quick eye-track focus is crucial.

Burst Shooting and Autofocus Intelligence

Speed is a deciding factor in action, wildlife, and sports photography, where moment capture separates the amateurs from the serious shooters.

The FP2 tops out at a 5 frames per second burst rate, but with single-shot autofocus only - meaning the camera focuses once prior to the burst. Additionally, its autofocus relies on contrast detection with 9 points, no continuous AF tracking, and no face detection.

Conversely, the Sony A290 shoots a slower 3 fps burst but offers sophisticated phase-detection autofocus, including continuous AF and face detection. Though 3 fps might seem pokey, its reliable AF tracking reduces lost moments substantially.

Panasonic FP2 front Panasonic FP2 screen back Sony A290 screen back

In practice, I found the FP2 well-suited for casual snaps, but it can’t keep pace in fast-moving scenarios - missed focus was a frequent frustration during impromptu sports shoots. The A290, despite slower burst speed, nabbed more in-focus sequences thanks to smarter autofocus and lens options.

Specialized Photography Disciplines: Where Each Shines

Portraiture

The Sony A290’s lens flexibility and larger sensor translate to superior skin tone rendition, creamy bokeh, and accurate eye detection. Its 14-bit RAW files provide a wealth of color data to finesse in post.

The Panasonic FP2’s limited lens opening and small sensor constrain background blur and skin tone subtlety, resulting in more “flat” portraits. It’s okay for snapshots but can’t compete in artistic expression or control.

Landscape

The A290’s wider dynamic range and finer detail deliver breathtaking landscapes, especially when paired with wider, sharp lenses. Environmental sealing isn’t present on either, but the Sony’s build feels more robust.

The FP2’s limited dynamic range and resolution mean landscapes frequently lack depth and pop, often needing effort to rescue shadow/highlight detail.

Wildlife and Sports

With its better AF system, ability to mount telephoto lenses, and optical viewfinder, the A290 is the only viable option here. The FP2’s slow AF and fixed lens severely limit wildlife and sports shooting, although its compactness is tempting for casual observation.

Street and Travel

Here the FP2 really shines. Its size and weight make it the perfect candidate for inconspicuous shooting and long day excursions without fatigue. The quick power-up time and silent operation evoke a candid shooter’s dream.

The Sony, while still portable for an SLR, is more noticeable and less nimble. However, if image quality or creative options top your priorities - even in urban exploration - the A290 has the advantage.

Macro and Night/Astro Photography

Neither camera is optimized here. The FP2 offers 10cm macro focusing with optical stabilization, which is competent for casual close-ups.

The A290’s interchangeable lenses include macro options; combined with sensor-based stabilization and manual settings, it can tackle more serious macro and night shooting.

Neither camera has specialized astro modes, and noise performance at very high ISO is limited by CCD technology.

Video Capabilities: Modest at Best

In 2010, video was not yet the DSLR hotspot it is today. The FP2 can capture up to 1280x720p at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format - a somewhat primitive codec that results in large files and moderate quality.

The Sony A290, surprisingly, lacks any video capabilities altogether. For hobbyists wanting basic video, the FP2 offers the bare minimum; for videographers, neither camera is compelling.

Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Battery Life

Neither camera offers weather sealing, dustproofing, or ruggedized features, so their use in harsh conditions requires care.

The FP2’s plastic ultracompact body feels delicate. Its tiny size also means a small battery with limited shots per charge (no official count is provided), so I recommend carrying spares for long days.

The A290’s larger body houses the NP-FH50 battery, rated for about 290 shots per charge - a respectable number consistent with entry-level DSLRs of the time.

Lens Ecosystem and Connectivity

Here the gap widens like an unbridgeable canyon.

The FP2 has a fixed 35-140mm equivalent lens - great for simplicity, terrible for customization.

The Sony A290’s Sony/Minolta Alpha mount opens the door to 143+ native lenses (and many third-party options), spanning wide-angle primes to super-telephoto zooms, macro lenses, and specialty optics. This versatility alone justifies the DSLR’s larger footprint and complexity.

Neither offers wireless connectivity, GPS, or Bluetooth - a given for 2010 models.

User Interface and Workflow Integration

Both cameras employ fixed LCD screens and physical buttons without touchscreen support. The FP2’s emphasis on automation means few menus, which is beginner-friendly but limiting for control seekers.

The A290 delivers manual exposure modes, exposure compensation, and white balance bracketing - much appreciated by hobbyists and semi-pros.

JPEG-only on the FP2 restricts post-processing finesse. The A290 supports RAW files for seamless integration with popular photo workflows like Adobe Lightroom.

Price and Value: Then and Now

At launch, the FP2 was marketed as an affordable ultracompact option priced around $80 - pocket change for casual users or as a backup camera.

The Sony A290 debuted at about $600 - affordable DSLR territory offering entry into the realm of serious photography.

From today’s perspective, these prices are mostly obsolete, but for those encountering these cameras second-hand, the FP2 remains a functional compact, while the A290 offers far greater creative potential.

If we attempt an aggregate, the Sony A290 scores higher overall across key factors like image quality, control, and flexibility, while the Panasonic FP2 leans heavily into portability and simplicity.

Breaking down genre performance further:

• Portrait: Sony A290 takes it for control and image depth
• Landscape: A290 again benefits from sensor size and lens options
• Wildlife/Sports: A290’s AF and lens reach dominate
• Street: Panasonic FP2 favored for discretion and weight
• Macro: Sony A290 wins through flexibility
• Night/Astro: Neither excels but A290’s manual control helps
• Video: Panasonic FP2 by default - Sony lacks video entirely
• Travel: FP2’s portability wins, A290 compromises freedom for quality
• Professional use: A290 alone suitable due to manual controls and RAW

Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which?

I’ve owned and tested thousands of cameras over the years, and here’s my candid takeaway.

If you’re a casual snapshooter prioritizing ultra-portability, lightweight and point-and-shoot ease, the Panasonic FP2 offers a neat, fuss-free package. Its limitations in lens choice, controls, and raw image quality mean it’s best as a pocketable, no-brainer companion for travel or everyday snapshots. Don’t expect stellar low light or action performance - this camera is firmly in the "fun and simple" category.

On the other hand, the Sony A290 is a capable entry-level DSLR that punches above its weight, offering manual exposure, interchangeable lenses, and better image quality. For hobbyists stepping into creative photography, who want to learn and grow their skills, it’s a solid value buy - especially as a used camera. Its bulk and lack of video might deter some, but those who cherish control and image fidelity can overlook these.

A Parting Tip for Buyers

Ultimately, your choice depends on your photographic ambitions. Are you the “snapshots and street stealth” type? The FP2 is tempting. Or are you itching to dive into aperture control, selective focus, and raw editing? Then the Sony A290 is waiting with open arms - and a vast lens arsenal.

Both cameras serve as reminders of a transitional era in photography: the point where ultra-compacts battled entry-level DSLRs for hearts and minds. I hope this hands-on exploration helps you place your bets wisely.

Happy shooting!

End of Article