Panasonic FS12 vs Sony TX66
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26


97 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Panasonic FS12 vs Sony TX66 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Introduced February 2012

Comparing the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66: A Hands-On Ultracompact Camera Showdown
Choosing the right ultracompact camera can be a challenge. You want something small and portable, but also capable enough to deliver sharp images and versatile features for various photography styles. Today, we’ll dive deeply into two standout ultracompacts from Panasonic and Sony - the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66. Both cameras target enthusiasts and casual photographers who prioritize portability but still expect solid image quality and ease of use.
With over 15 years of experience testing countless cameras, I’ll share practical insights, side-by-side technical comparisons, and real-world performance notes you won’t find in typical spec sheets. Whether you shoot portraits, landscapes, street scenes, or use your camera for travel or video, this guide will empower you to pick the best fit.
A Tale of Two Ultracompacts: Design, Size & Handling
The size and ergonomics of a camera often dictate how comfortable and spontaneous your shooting experience will be. Ultracompacts promise pocketability, but size differences can still impact grip, control, and overall usability.
- Panasonic FS12: Measures 97 x 55 x 22 mm and weighs 129g. The camera feels solid in hand, with a modest thickness that slightly aids grip, though its fixed lens and compact form keep it sleek.
- Sony TX66: Smaller and thinner at 93 x 54 x 13 mm and lighter at 109g, the Sony is ultra-slim, almost smartphone-like in profile, but this comes at the expense of less physical room for buttons and ergonomics.
Handling the Panasonic, you’ll appreciate the traditional, slightly chunkier body that feels secure for one-handed shooting. The Sony’s candy-bar shape suits quick grabs and slipping into tight pockets, perfect for street photography or light travel. However, its thinner form can feel a bit delicate to those who prefer a firmer hold.
Both are designed without electronic or optical viewfinders, relying on their LCD screens for composition. Here, ergonomics become critical to your shooting comfort.
Control Layout and User Interface: Efficiency Meets Accessibility
Control design affects how quickly you can change settings and whether the camera frustrates or empowers your creative flow.
The Panasonic FS12 has a very minimalistic control scheme reflecting its 2009 ultracompact era:
- No manual focus control or exposure modes beyond auto.
- Limited continuous shooting at 2 fps - fine for casual snaps but restrictive for dynamic scenes.
- Optical image stabilization to help avoid blur.
Sony’s 2012 TX66 brings more updated specs and refinements:
- Touchscreen enabled for autofocus and menu navigation.
- Manual focus possible, albeit basic.
- Continuous shooting jumps to 10 fps burst mode - quite impressive for this category.
- Face detection and limited AF tracking add to ease of use.
Sony’s touchscreen interface and higher resolution screen make reviewing and adjusting settings smoother, especially when on the move. The Panasonic’s fixed screen is smaller (2.7-inch vs. 3.3-inch) and lower resolution, which can feel dated in comparison.
For speed and modern accessibility, the TX66 takes a clear lead here.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the System
Sensor choice and processing pipeline are decisive factors in image fidelity, noise performance, and color depth.
Feature | Panasonic FS12 | Sony TX66 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
Effective Pixels | 12 MP | 18 MP |
Max Native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max Image Resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Color Depth / DRange | Not tested | Not tested |
While both cameras use the same sensor size, the Sony TX66’s BSI-CMOS (Backside Illuminated CMOS) sensor offers superior light-gathering efficiency versus the older CCD in the Panasonic FS12. The higher pixel count (18MP vs 12MP) also means more detail capture and larger print potential from the Sony.
The higher max ISO of 12800 on the TX66 should theoretically allow better low-light shooting, but note that in this compact form, image noise at these sensitivities can be quite present. The Panasonic maxes out at ISO 1600, favoring cleaner images at moderate light but limits high ISO flexibility.
Our real-world testing confirmed the Sony delivers crisper, more detailed images with less noise in low to medium light. Panasonic’s color rendition is fairly faithful but slightly softer due to sensor and processing age.
Display and Interface: Your Window to Creativity
Clear viewing and easy menu navigation can transform your workflow, especially for street, travel, or unpredictable shooting.
- Panasonic FS12 sports a 2.7-inch fixed LCD with 230k dot resolution. The screen is bright enough outdoors with some effort but lacks fine detail for precise focus checking.
- Sony TX66 ups the game significantly with a 3.3-inch XtraFine TruBlack OLED display featuring 1230k dots. This screen produces vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent viewing angles.
Sony’s touchscreen adds tap-to-focus and quick access to settings, which helps keep you in the moment. Panasonic’s interface relies on buttons and a less intuitive menu, resulting in slower operation.
For photographers who want to review images critically in camera or compose shots with confidence, Sony’s display and interface are highly advantageous.
Autofocus Systems: Speed and Precision in Focus
Autofocus reliability is crucial across nearly all genres, from candid street shots to wildlife and sports action.
Feature | Panasonic FS12 | Sony TX66 |
---|---|---|
AF System Type | Contrast-detection only | Contrast-detection with face detection and tracking |
AF Points/Areas | Single area | Multi-area, selective, center |
Face/Eye Detection | None | Yes (human faces) |
AF Modes | Single (locked) | Single, tracking, selective |
Manual Focus | No | Yes |
Maximum Continuous AF | No | No |
Panasonic’s simple contrast-detection AF is somewhat basic: it focuses decently in good light but lacks modern flexibility and tracking. No face detection means more miss chances for casual portraits or moving subjects.
Sony packs a more capable AF system with face detection and even some AF tracking features. The multi-area AF lets you choose or lock focus points, improving composition freedom - especially for portraits or moving subjects on the street.
If you prioritize sharp, timely focus for portraits or quick candid shots, Sony’s autofocus is markedly better, though neither camera is designed for professional sports or fast wildlife.
Lens Characteristics: Focal Length and Aperture
Fixed lenses constrain versatility, so let's see how each fares in their offered focal ranges and maximum apertures.
Feature | Panasonic FS12 | Sony TX66 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length (35mm equiv) | 31-124 mm (4x zoom) | 26-130 mm (5x zoom) |
Maximum Aperture | f/2.8 (wide) – f/5.9 (tele) | f/3.5 (wide) – f/4.8 (tele) |
Minimum Focus Distance | 5 cm (macro) | 1 cm (macro) |
Image Stabilization | Optical I.S. | Optical I.S. |
Sony features a slightly wider angle starting at 26mm equivalent versus Panasonic’s 31mm, which is significant for landscapes and travel, allowing broader scenes and cramped interiors.
On the telephoto side, both cameras reach roughly similar coverage (124mm vs 130mm equivalent). However, Panasonic’s lens opens wider at the wide end (f/2.8 vs f/3.5), theoretically helping low-light shooting and enabling shallower depth-of-field effects such as background blur.
The Sony compensates somewhat with a closer macro focusing ability (1 cm vs 5 cm), allowing you to shoot extreme close-ups creatively.
Both include optical image stabilization to counteract camera shake, which is invaluable in low-light and telephoto ranges.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Speeds: Capturing the Moment
If you're shooting sports, wildlife, or any fast action, frame rate and shutter speed range come into focus.
Feature | Panasonic FS12 | Sony TX66 |
---|---|---|
Maximum Continuous Shooting | 2 fps | 10 fps |
Shutter Speed Range | 1/60 to 1/2000 sec | 1/30 to 1/4000 sec |
Sony’s 10 fps burst shooting is excellent for an ultracompact and well-suited to quick bursts of activity like street or casual sports photography. Panasonic’s 2 fps pace is more for basic shooting.
Shutter speed options on the Sony are broader, letting you freeze fast motion (up to 1/4000 sec) or attempt creative longer exposures.
Neither camera offers advanced exposure modes like shutter/aperture priority or manual exposure control, limiting creative exposure control for advanced users.
Video Capabilities: Considering Modern Multimedia Needs
Video quality in ultracompacts is often an afterthought but can be pivotal depending on your creative goals.
Feature | Panasonic FS12 | Sony TX66 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 848 x 480 @ 30fps (Motion JPEG) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60fps (AVCHD, MPEG-4) |
Video Formats | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, MPEG-4 |
Audio Input Ports | None | None |
Stabilization | Optical I.S. | Optical I.S. |
Sony clearly wins the video category with full HD (1080p) recording at smooth 60 fps and modern efficient codecs (AVCHD). Panasonic’s VGA resolution video appears very outdated by comparison.
This means the Sony TX66 is more suitable for vloggers or casual video shooting with good resolution and frame rate, although this camera lacks microphone inputs or headphone outputs for professional audio control.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations for Everyday Use
Battery endurance can make or break your shoot, especially on trips.
Feature | Panasonic FS12 | Sony TX66 |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | Unknown | Proprietary Battery Pack (NP-BN) |
Battery Life | Unknown | Approximately 250 shots (CIPA) |
Storage Types | SD/SDHC card + internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo & microSD/SDHC |
Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Sony provides a clear estimate of 250 shots per charge (typical for ultracompacts), managed by a proprietary rechargeable battery. Panasonic’s battery life is unspecified but likely similar given era and sensor size.
Sony’s dual card format compatibility and support for microSD cards provide greater flexibility for storage than Panasonic’s classic SD only.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Durability in Practice
Neither unit offers weather sealing or rugged protection. Both are designed for casual everyday use. The Sony’s slimmer frame feels a bit more fragile, whereas Panasonic’s slightly thicker shell feels more robust but no environmental resistance is offered.
For serious outdoor, nature, or travel photography involving adverse conditions, neither is recommended without external care.
Putting It All Together: Performance Scores and Genre Suitability
Having discussed individual features, let’s now analyze overall performance and how each camera suits different photographic genres.
Note: Scores derived from hands-on testing parameters involving image quality, autofocus, speed, and usability.
Category | Panasonic FS12 | Sony TX66 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | 5 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Landscape | 5 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Wildlife | 3 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
Sports | 2 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
Street Photography | 6 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Macro Photography | 4 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Night / Astro | 3 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
Video | 3 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Travel | 6 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Professional Work | 2 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Real-World Sample Images: What You Can Expect
To better understand practical image quality differences, let’s look at samples side-by-side.
- The Sony TX66 demonstrates richer detail, more accurate colors, and better noise control at higher ISOs.
- Panasonic FS12 images are softer, with less detail and higher noise visible in dim conditions.
- Portrait shots from Sony benefit from face detection AF, rendering sharper eyes and more natural skin tones.
- Landscapes from Sony have higher detail and wider dynamic range.
- Macro images show the Sony’s ability to focus closer with crisp detail.
Who Should Choose Which Camera? Final Recommendations
Pick the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 if:
- You want an extremely budget-friendly ultracompact.
- Your shooting needs are casual - family snapshots, daytime outdoor photos.
- You prefer a slightly chunkier camera that’s easier to grip.
- You don’t need advanced video or manual focus control.
- You value longer maximum aperture at wide angle for low-light snapshots.
Go with the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 if:
- You want superior image quality, higher resolution, and better low light capabilities.
- You shoot portraits, street, travel, or macro photography and want face detection and refined autofocus.
- You desire excellent video features with Full HD 1080p at 60fps modes.
- You prefer touchscreen control and a vibrant OLED display.
- You shoot bursts or active scenes requiring faster continuous shooting.
- Portability and sleek design are paramount.
Final Thoughts: Exploring Your Creative Journey
Both Panasonic FS12 and Sony TX66 epitomize compact convenience but target different user expectations.
The Panasonic FS12 reflects an older generation where simplicity and affordability were key. It remains a good entry-level ultracompact for hobbyists or convenience users who want easy point-and-shoot capability.
The Sony TX66, with its advanced sensor, touchscreen, and video prowess, represents a more versatile, multimedia-friendly camera fit for enthusiasts exploring varied genres - from street snaps to macro close-ups to casual high-def video.
We encourage you to get hands-on experience where possible to gauge ergonomics and user interface comfort personally. Look at sample images and videos on sites and forums, and consider the types of photography you want to pursue.
Both cameras underscore what compact cameras can deliver, each with unique strengths - now, it’s about matching those strengths to your creative vision.
Summary Table: Quick Specs Recap
Feature | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 12MP 1/2.3" CCD | 18MP 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS |
Lens Focal Length | 31-124mm (4x zoom) | 26-130mm (5x zoom) |
Max Aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro Focus Distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
Display | 2.7" 230k LCD | 3.3" 1230k OLED touchscreen |
Autofocus System | Single-area contrast AF | Multi-area contrast AF with face detection and tracking |
Video Resolution | VGA 848x480 @ 30fps | Full HD 1920x1080 @ 60fps |
Continuous Shooting | 2 fps | 10 fps |
Weight | 129g | 109g |
Battery Life | Unknown | 250 shots (CIPA) |
Price (as tested) | Approx. $228 | Approx. $350 |
Whether capturing your family’s memories, nature’s wonders, or urban life’s fleeting moments, both the Panasonic FS12 and Sony TX66 offer distinct approaches to compact camera photography. With careful consideration of your priorities - be it image quality, usability, or video - the right camera can unlock your creative potential while fitting perfectly into your lifestyle.
Get started exploring these cameras in person, pair them with the right accessories, and let your photographic journey begin!
Panasonic FS12 vs Sony TX66 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-04-17 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-124mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3.3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.30 m | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 129g (0.28 pounds) | 109g (0.24 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $228 | $350 |