Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11515/1151579478081071cc2b1eedc776984b8b96fb07" alt="Sony Alpha a6400 front Sony Alpha a6400 front"
83 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Expand to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Increase to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Introduced January 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Panasonic and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the FS42 (10MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the FS42 (1/2.5") and A6400 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The FS42 was released 10 years prior to the A6400 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the FS42 grades against the A6400 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 & Sony Alpha a6400. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic FS42 Gallery & Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Sony A6400
FS42 | A6400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Panasonic FS42
A6400 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2019 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 118 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Panasonic FS42 and Sony A6400
FS42 | A6400 |
---|
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Panasonic FS42 has physical measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Sony A6400 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the FS42 and the A6400.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be098/be098946328ce3780c6e4b4b978cf3cdff83c150" alt="Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 size comparison Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FS42 and A6400 is 95 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a691/3a691d9c67e60e89e0b7d2caad1c6b5bd88d4cca" alt="Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FS42 and A6400.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The FS42 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A6400 will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older FS42 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a0a4/0a0a408966a28c2e443bb9ff6902028af8db0bd6" alt="Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd1ad/dd1ad722ade8c2d5a47a22273472a1c9b335eda6" alt="Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony A6400 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | Sony Alpha a6400 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-04-17 | 2019-01-15 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1000 | 32000 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 33-132mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.30 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | 403g (0.89 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $580 | $898 |