Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX2
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Panasonic FX75 and Ricoh CX2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Panasonic and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the FX75 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FX75 was introduced 10 months later than the CX2 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the FX75 matches up against the CX2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 and Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are provided at Panasonic FX75 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Ricoh CX2
| FX75 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 10 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Panasonic FX75
| CX2 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Ricoh CX2
| FX75 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FX75 offers outside dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FX75 and Ricoh CX2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the FX75 against the CX2.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the FX75 and CX2 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The photograph below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the FX75 and CX2.
To sum up, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Panasonic FX75 to provide you with extra detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent FX75 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-01 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine HD II | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $139 | $341 |