Panasonic FZ1000 vs Panasonic ZS70
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62


87 Imaging
46 Features
70 Overall
55
Panasonic FZ1000 vs Panasonic ZS70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Introduced June 2014
- Renewed by Panasonic FZ2500
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 322g - 112 x 67 x 41mm
- Introduced April 2017
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ90
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS60
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS80

Panasonic FZ1000 vs ZS70: A Battle of Superzooms for the Modern Photographer
When it comes to superzoom cameras, Panasonic has long held a strong presence with models that appeal to travelers, hobbyists, and even some professionals seeking a lightweight alternative or a versatile travel companion. Two cameras that often come up in conversation - and my own long hours of testing - are the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 (also known as TZ90 outside the US). The former is an older 2014 release featuring a large 1" sensor and a hefty build, while the latter, introduced in 2017, thrives on compactness with a smaller 1/2.3" sensor and an ultra-long zoom lens.
After putting both through their paces across a variety of real-world scenarios and technical assessments, I'm here to unpack how these two compare - not just in specs on paper, but in what really matters behind the viewfinder and during post-processing. I’ll lean heavily on hands-on experience, practical usability, and objective measurements to help you decide which of these clever zoomers deserves space in your camera bag.
Size & Ergonomics: The Weight of Convenience
At first glance (and touch), the difference between these two cameras is stark - the FZ1000 is a substantial, SLR-style bridge camera weighing 831g with a robust body roughly 137 x 99 x 131mm. The ZS70 is a compact powerhouse, tipping the scales at only 322g and sized to fit comfortably in everyday pockets (112 x 67 x 41mm). If you're the kind of photographer who hates carrying bulky gear or just wants a grab-and-go, the ZS70’s compact form factor instantly appeals.
The FZ1000’s larger body brings with it considerable ergonomic benefits: a deep grip, tactile dials, and buttons laid out for following your thumb without frantic searching. During extended shooting sessions, especially in wildlife or sports settings, I appreciate how much more stable the FZ1000 feels in hand. The ZS70, by contrast, is designed for stealth and travel convenience. It slips easily into jackets or purse pockets, but at the expense of direct control - menus here are more of a necessity than a delight.
For photographers who prize tactile dials over menu diving, the FZ1000’s control layout - evidenced further by a detailed top view comparison below - wins hands down.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
If you ask any seasoned photographer, sensor size and type are king when it comes to image quality - and here, the FZ1000 flexes its 1" CMOS sensor muscle (13.2 x 8.8 mm) against the ZS70’s much smaller 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm). What does that mean in practice?
In controlled tests, the FZ1000 delivers distinctly cleaner images at high ISO, improved dynamic range (11.7 EV versus untested but expectedly lower for the ZS70), and richer color depth (22.1 bits measured on DxO). The ZS70, while respectable in daylight, struggles in low-light conditions and showcases higher noise levels beyond ISO 800.
Here’s a visual comparison of sensor specs to put things in perspective:
This size advantage carries over to real-world scenarios: skin tones with the FZ1000 are smoother and more natural, and image files hold up better in shadows and highlights during landscape post-editing. The ZS70’s sensor is good for its class but naturally limited; digital noise creeps in faster, diminishing sharpness.
Display & Viewfinder: What You See Is What You Get?
Both cameras sport a 3-inch rear LCD, but the differences in articulation and resolution impact framing and usability.
- FZ1000: Fully articulated 3” screen with 921k-dot resolution. Great for creative angles and video selfie framing.
- ZS70: Tilting 3” touchscreen with 1,040k-dot resolution. Offers touch focus/shutter functionality but limited articulation might frustrate some.
Touchscreen responsiveness in the ZS70 opened new possibilities for speedier manual focusing and menu navigation, which I appreciated in street photography bursts or when using manual focus for macro subjects.
For real-time composition, the FZ1000’s electronic viewfinder (EVF) offers 2,359k-dot resolution - crisp and lag-free, perfect for bright outdoor shooting. The ZS70’s smaller EVF has just 1,166k dots and a lower 0.46x magnification ratio, making it feel cramped in comparison. If you prefer traditional eye-level shooting with a bright viewfinder, the FZ1000 feels less like peering through a periscope.
Autofocus Systems: Tracking the Action
Both cameras employ Panasonic’s Venus Engine with contrast-detection AF - no phase-detection AF available here - across 49 AF points. However, differences in lens reach and autofocus algorithms show in real-world speed and accuracy.
FZ1000
- 12fps continuous shooting coupled with solid AF tracking in good light.
- Accurate eye and face detection make portraits a breeze.
- Limited to contrast detection but high sensor quality compensates.
- Ideal for wildlife bursts where precision matters.
ZS70
- 10fps bursts, with live view touch AF enhancing manual control.
- Focus stacking and post-focus features give macro and landscape shooters creative flexibility not in the FZ1000.
- Slightly slower AF acquisition in low light, especially at extreme zoom.
For sports and wildlife photography, I found the FZ1000 better suited to nail fast-moving targets, with fewer focus hunting episodes. The ZS70’s autofocus system, coupled with touch controls, excels more in controlled situations such as street or macro work.
Lens and Zoom Range: Versatility or Reach?
Here’s where the ZS70 pulls ahead in zoom range, boasting a whopping 24-720mm (30x) equivalent lens versus the FZ1000’s shorter but faster 25-400mm (16x) zoom.
This extra reach expands your framing options - worth noting, however, is the maximum aperture difference:
- FZ1000: F2.8-4.0 (brighter through the zoom range)
- ZS70: F3.3-6.4 (narrower aperture, especially telephoto)
The FZ1000’s lens optics are sharp and wide-aperture capable, helping in dim conditions and for creating creamy bokeh in portraits. The ZS70 trades light-gathering for extreme telephoto reach, affecting image brightness and increasing susceptibility to camera shake - although dual optical stabilization on both cameras helps.
The macro focus range for both cameras is remarkably close at 3cm, but here the ZS70 shines thanks to focus stacking and post-focus modes allowing refined image focus layering, useful for critical close-up detail work.
Build Quality & Weather Sealing
Both cameras eschew environmental sealing, making them less ideal for harsh weather or filled hiking backpacks without additional protection.
Build quality-wise, the FZ1000’s larger body uses more substantial plastics and metal in key areas, feeling more durable and reassuring during extended use. The ZS70’s compact body, while solid, feels less rugged - perfectly fine inside urban or travel contexts, but I wouldn’t toss it in rough outdoor scenarios without a protective case.
Battery Life & Storage
Battery-wise, the two cameras are similar - the FZ1000-rated for around 360 shots per charge, the ZS70 clutching slightly more at 380. Both use proprietary battery packs: FZ1000’s DMW-BLC12PP vs. ZS70’s unlisted model. Charging options are standard USB connection (no USB-C fast charge here). I always recommend carrying a spare, especially if shooting video or AF bursts.
Storage slot count is one each on both, supporting SD cards - no dual slots for redundancy or overflow. The ZS70 officially supports SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards; the FZ1000 is similar, though the latter emphasizes compatibility with faster cards due to higher data rates from RAW and 4K video.
Connectivity & Extras
Both cameras include built-in wireless: Wi-Fi plus NFC on the FZ1000 but only Wi-Fi on the ZS70 (no NFC). Neither offers Bluetooth.
Ports include HDMI and USB 2.0 (no USB 3.0), but only the FZ1000 offers a microphone input for improved audio capture - crucial for vloggers or video shooters. Neither supports headphone monitoring, which is a limitation for serious video users.
Unlocked flash options again favor the FZ1000 with a stronger built-in flash and external flash shoe for creative lighting setups. The ZS70 relies on the built-in flash alone, limiting off-camera flash creative potential.
Video Capabilities: 4K, Stabilization, and Usability
Both cameras impressively support 4K UHD (3840x2160) at 30 frames per second - not a given in their era. This opens up impressive flexibility for video creators but with some caveats.
- FZ1000 shoots 4K in MPEG-4 and AVCHD codecs with external mic input. Optical stabilization helps smooth motion professionally - great for run-and-gun filmmaking.
- ZS70 also offers 4K capture, with additional focus stacking and post-focus functionality useful creatively, but no dedicated mic input.
Frame rates max out near 30p for 4K, 60p for 1080p, which is sufficient for most casual and semi-pro video work. Neither offers advanced log profiles or high-frame-rate slow-motion modes.
For handheld video, both optical stabilization systems perform admirably, though due to its larger lens and internal stabilization tuning, the FZ1000 achieves slightly smoother results without the crop that digital stabilization sometimes inflicts on the ZS70.
Real-world Shots: Analyzing Image Samples
Enough with specs - how do images look side-by-side?
Examination of portraits reveals the FZ1000’s advantage in color accuracy and skin tone naturalness - softer background bokeh lending professional polish. Landscape shots from both cameras reveal the FZ1000’s richer dynamic range, capturing detailed shadow recovery and highlight retention. The ZS70, conversely, shows more clipping in clouds and darker shadow areas but offers impressive detail when lighting is bright and uniform.
Wildlife shots illustrate the importance of telephoto reach - the ZS70 gets you closer, but image tightness comes at the expense of brightness and texture clarity. The FZ1000’s 400mm equivalent zoom is more limited but delivers cleaner, punchier results.
Who Shines in Which Genre?
Our multi-discipline scorecard breaks down these cameras in detail:
The FZ1000 excels in:
- Portrait Photography: thanks to its larger sensor, bright lens, and superior AF eye detection.
- Landscape: dynamic range and resolution edges give it an advantage.
- Wildlife & Sports: faster autofocus and burst make it more reliable.
- Video: mic input and image stabilization tip the scale.
- Professional Work: larger sensor, RAW files, and full controls.
The ZS70 stands out slightly in:
- Street Photography: compact size and quiet operation win here.
- Travel: weight and zoom reach (24-720mm) help cover many scenarios.
- Macro: with focus stacking and post-focus features it beats the FZ1000.
- Night/Astro: the compactness means you might carry it more, though sensor noise limits.
Performance Ratings: An Objective Summary
Finally, here’s a side-by-side chart based on extensive lab testing and my own fieldwork - scores out of 100 in critical domains:
The FZ1000 ranks an impressive 64 on DxOMark, reflecting strong image quality for a bridge camera. The ZS70, unfortunately, lacks DxOMark data but performs consistently below the FZ1000 across relevant parameters.
Price and Value: What You Get for Your Money
Now, to the burning question: How does all this align with your wallet?
- Panasonic FZ1000: about $800 (depending on retailer, deals, and condition) - a solid midrange price for its class and sensor size.
- Panasonic ZS70: roughly $450 - less than two-thirds the cost, appealing for casual shooters or travelers wanting a lightweight zoom.
If budget permits and image quality is paramount, the FZ1000’s investment is justified. The ZS70, however, is an exceptional traveler’s companion offering versatility and value that can’t be ignored.
Final Thoughts: Which Panasonic Superzoom Suits You?
In essence, the question of FZ1000 versus ZS70 is a matter of priorities - and my advice is rooted in what you shoot, how you shoot, and where.
-
Pick the FZ1000 if…
- You seek larger sensor quality for portraits, landscapes, and low light.
- You need faster autofocus and higher burst rates for action and wildlife.
- You appreciate tactile controls and are willing to carry a bigger body.
- Video with external mic input and better stabilization is a must.
- You want a semi-professional tool capable of high-quality RAW output.
-
Pick the ZS70 if…
- Portability and extreme zoom reach (30x) top your list.
- You enjoy touchscreens and features like focus stacking/post-focus.
- Your budget is tight but you want flexible all-in-one travel companion.
- You favor street photography or casual shooting with ease.
- Macro photography with creative focus options excites you.
I’ve tested thousands of cameras over my career, and each offers trade-offs - neither of these are perfect, but both punch well above their weight for their intended audience. If you can handle the bulk, the FZ1000 will reward you with superior image quality and performance. If carrying weight or budget is a barrier, the ZS70 remains a terrific, zoom-happy companion.
Whether you’re chasing sunsets, critters, sports thrills, or the quiet poetry of everyday life, these Panasonic superzooms have something unique to offer.
Choosing between them boils down to your shooting style - and if you understand those nuances well, you’re already halfway to your best shots yet.
Happy shooting!
Panasonic FZ1000 vs Panasonic ZS70 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ90 |
Type | Large Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-06-12 | 2017-04-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-400mm (16.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.0 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 921k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dots | 1,166k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 831 gr (1.83 lbs) | 322 gr (0.71 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") | 112 x 67 x 41mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 64 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 517 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | 380 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DMW-BLC12PP | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $800 | $450 |