Panasonic FZ2500 vs Panasonic G2
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
72 Imaging
47 Features
60 Overall
52
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Panasonic G2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Announced September 2016
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 428g - 124 x 84 x 74mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Older Model is Panasonic G1
- Replacement is Panasonic G3
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Panasonic G2 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Panasonic FZ2500 versus Panasonic G2, one being a Large Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are built by Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the FZ2500 (20MP) and G2 (12MP) and the FZ2500 (1") and G2 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FZ2500 was released 6 years later than the G2 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic G2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the FZ2500 matches up versus the G2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Panasonic G2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2. The complete galleries are provided at Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery and Panasonic G2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Panasonic G2
FZ2500 | G2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | July 2010 | Fresher by 76 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic G2 over the Panasonic FZ2500
G2 | FZ2500 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic FZ2500 and Panasonic G2
FZ2500 | G2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Panasonic G2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Panasonic FZ2500 features exterior dimensions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs) whilst the Panasonic G2 has specifications of 124mm x 84mm x 74mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic FZ2500 versus Panasonic G2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the FZ2500 and the G2.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the FZ2500 and G2 is 53 and 72 respectively.
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Panasonic G2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through technical specs. The visual here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FZ2500 and G2.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FZ2500 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Panasonic FZ2500 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images way more aggressively. The fresher FZ2500 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Panasonic G2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Panasonic G2 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 |
Alternate name | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 | - |
Category | Large Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-07-12 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 11.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 915 gr (2.02 pounds) | 428 gr (0.94 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") | 124 x 84 x 74mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 70 | 53 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.6 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | 538 | 493 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 360 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DMW-BLC12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $998 | $1,000 |