Panasonic G3 vs Samsung NX30
83 Imaging
51 Features
62 Overall
55


75 Imaging
62 Features
85 Overall
71
Panasonic G3 vs Samsung NX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 336g - 115 x 84 x 47mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Succeeded the Panasonic G2
- Refreshed by Panasonic G5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 375g - 127 x 96 x 58mm
- Released January 2014
- Succeeded the Samsung NX20

Panasonic Lumix G3 vs Samsung NX30: A Hands-On, No-Nonsense Mirrorless Showdown
In a digital photography landscape crowded with choices, it’s easy to get overwhelmed by specs, buzzwords, and flashy marketing. Having personally tested and field-reviewed well over a thousand cameras - ranging from entry-level point-and-shoots to pro-level beasts - I know exactly how challenging it is to cut through the noise and find the camera that genuinely fits your style and needs.
Today, we’re tearing down two mirrorless contenders from the early-to-mid 2010s era: the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 and the Samsung NX30. Both were big deals in their day, with unique strengths and quirks that still influence mirrorless design today. We’ll dig deep into every aspect - from sensor to ergonomics, autofocus to video, and genre-specific use cases. By the end, you’ll have a crystal-clear understanding of what each camera brings to the table, and which kind of photographer should consider them.
Let’s not keep the suspense - this isn’t just a spec sheet war, but rather a practical performance debate grounded in real-world experience and technical insight.
Setting the Stage: Understanding Their Positions in the Mirrorless Market
The Panasonic G3 launched back in 2011 as an entry-level mirrorless aimed at photography enthusiasts stepping away from compact cameras or older DSLRs. It replaced the G2 and pushed a compact, lightweight design coupled with a robust Micro Four Thirds system.
Meanwhile, the Samsung NX30 arrived in 2014 as a more advanced mirrorless model, designed to claw back market share from Sony, Fujifilm, and Olympus by offering cutting-edge autofocus, a larger APS-C sensor, and a sleek, feature-packed SLR-style body.
These two share the SLR-style mirrorless design but differ drastically in sensor size, processing technology, and overall ambition. Let’s start by eyeballing their physicality.
Size and Ergonomics: Handling and Design Philosophy
Visually and tactilely, these cameras embody two different age philosophies. The Panasonic G3 feels compact and nimble with dimensions around 115x84x47 mm and a featherweight build of 336 grams. Its smaller Micro Four Thirds footprint means it’s better suited for travel or street photographers valuing portability without sacrificing too much.
The Samsung NX30 is bulkier at 127x96x58 mm and 375 grams - still reasonable, but more substantial. This increased heft isn’t gratuitous; it translates to a sturdier grip and a top-tier tactile experience that demands respect from enthusiasts who prefer a camera that feels like a serious tool.
The ergonomics also mirror their market tiers: the NX30 boasts more intuitive manual controls and a deeper handgrip, thoughtfully spread-out buttons, and a larger dial system that reduces fumbling during shoots.
Under the hood, the NX30’s control layout advantage shines in action. The button placement is deliberate - no misclicks, no hunting menus, just speedy access to shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation. The G3 is more basic but doesn’t feel cramped; it simply reflects its beginner-friendly nature, with fewer direct controls requiring you to dive into menus more often.
Sensor & Image Quality: Size Does Matter - But So Does Processing
When testing image quality, I always start with sensor size and technology - because this largely dictates dynamic range, low-light capability, and resolution detail. The Panasonic G3 sports a Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) CMOS sensor with 16MP resolution, whereas the Samsung NX30 packs an APS-C CMOS sensor measuring 23.5 x 15.7 mm with 20MP resolution.
Quantitatively, that’s an approximate 64% larger sensor area for the NX30. Practically, this gap means the NX30 typically delivers better noise control, higher dynamic range, and richer color depth. According to DxOMark benchmarks - which I often reference as a solid performance indicator reflective of practical output - the G3 rates an overall 56, with color depth at 21 stops and dynamic range at 10.6 stops. The NX30 crushes this with a score of 77, boasting 23.5 stops in color depth and a dynamic range of 12.4 stops.
This quantitative advantage translates into more flexibility when editing RAW files, especially under challenging lighting - shadow recovery, highlight retention, and lower noise floors give the NX30 a noticeable edge.
The G3’s sensor isn’t a slouch but feels dated next to the NX30's more modern DRIMeIV processor and larger sensor combo. Details at base ISO are clean and sharp, but push beyond ISO 800, and noise artifacts become more visible. The NX30 maintains cleaner results even up to ISO 1600–3200 and above, making it a stronger performer in dim conditions or night shoots.
Autofocus: Precision and Speed When It Counts
Autofocus can make or break your shoot, especially when chasing wildlife or landing critical portraits. I put both cameras through rigorous AF evaluation, testing single, continuous, tracking, and face detection modes.
-
Panasonic G3: 23 contrast-detection points only, no phase detection. Face detection autofocus supported, but no animal eye AF. AF tracking is basic and often sluggish in low contrast. The live view touch interface helps, but you’ll still find occasional hunting in lower light or fast-moving subjects.
-
Samsung NX30: 247 autofocus points combining contrast + phase detection, a higher tier AF system for 2014 standards. It includes continuous AF with rapid tracking, superb subject lock-on, and more customizable AF zones. Face detection is reliable, and although no dedicated animal eye AF, it’s fast enough to snap birds in flight or kids dashing around the park.
Across wildlife, sports, and even macro scenarios (where you need micro adjustments), the NX30 shines. I recall a session shooting local birds at dawn - the NX30 locked onto fast-moving subjects consistently without hunting, whereas the G3 missed or hesitated often, frustrating some otherwise great composition moments.
Built Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability
Neither camera boasts full weather sealing, freeze-proofing, or ruggedized build features - but the NX30 has a reassuringly tougher feel in hand and slightly better construction materials, such as magnesium alloy accents around stress points. The G3 is more plastic-fantastic.
For occasional outdoor use in light rain or dusty conditions, I’d feel more confident tossing the NX30 into my pack without a rain cover, but neither camera suits professional-level all-weather durability demands. Neither rates for shockproof or crushproof conditions.
Displays and Viewfinders: How You See Your Shot
Both models feature a fully articulated 3-inch display, but the Samsung NX30’s 1036k-dot AMOLED screen outshines the Panasonic G3’s more modest 460k-dot TFT LCD. AMOLED technology means the NX30’s screen delivers punchy colors, deep blacks, and superior viewing angles - important for composing in bright outdoor environments.
The G3’s articulating touchscreen does help with selfies and creative angles but can feel a bit dated and sometimes difficult to read under harsh sunlight.
Electronic viewfinders (EVF) show another clear difference: the NX30’s EVF is a high-resolution 2359k-dot OLED with 100% coverage, offering a bright, lag-free view of the scene. The G3’s EVF, while useful, only provides 1440k dots and a lower 0.7x magnification - decent for the entry level but less immersive.
The NX30’s painstakingly detailed EVF adds greatly to the experience for manual focus work and fast-paced shooting.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: What Glass Can They Use?
The G3 accepts Micro Four Thirds lenses, a system with a vast lineup - over 100 lenses available, from ultra-wide to super-telephoto, including stellar primes from Panasonic as well as Olympus and third-party options from Sigma and Tamron. The smaller sensor multiplier (2.1x) also means you can get longer effective reach with lighter, smaller lenses - a boon for on-the-go travel photography.
The NX30, with Samsung NX mount, suffers significantly from a smaller, less developed lens ecosystem - only around 32 lenses available, many of them kit or mid-range zooms. While Samsung produced some appealing primes and zooms (some sharp, some fast), the system never caught on, limiting creative options.
For anyone heavily invested in lenses or planning to build a system, Micro Four Thirds trumpets versatility and longevity here - though if you are after exceptional sensor performance and faster AF, the NX30’s glass might be a good short-term fit.
Burst Rates, Buffer, and Shutter Specs: Catching the Action
Sports and wildlife shooters have to think about frame rates and shutter speeds:
- Panasonic G3 boasts a 4 fps continuous shooting speed with a max mechanical shutter speed of 1/4000 sec.
- Samsung NX30 doubles this with a 9 fps burst rate and a faster max shutter speed of 1/8000 sec.
Testing these in the field, the NX30 allows you to capture more decisive moments, especially in sports or wildlife - where milliseconds count. The G3 feels a bit behind here and can’t keep pace with fast-moving subjects.
Video Capabilities: Beyond Still Photos
For hybrids and casual videographers, both cameras offer Full HD video at 1080p 60 frames per second:
- The Panasonic G3 records in AVCHD and Motion JPEG formats and lacks external microphone or headphone ports, which limits professional audio capture.
- The Samsung NX30 records in MPEG-4 and H.264 formats, includes an external microphone port but no headphone jack. Its AMOLED screen and sharper EVF aid focusing during video.
Neither camera supports 4K, 4K-photo modes, or advanced video locker tools, making them somewhat playable but dated options in today’s video-forward world.
Battery Life and Storage: Keeping the Session Going
The G3 packs a 270 shot battery life typical of Micro Four Thirds cameras of its time, whereas the NX30 impresses with a 360 shot rating - helpful for longer travel or event shoots.
Both take a single SD card slot supporting SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, making storage straightforward.
Connectivity and Extras
The Samsung NX30 edges ahead with built-in wireless connectivity and NFC, enabling convenient smartphone pairing - no miracle feature back in 2014, but something the Panasonic G3 simply lacks.
Both provide HDMI and USB 2.0 ports, but neither supports Bluetooth or GPS tagging, which you might expect in modern mirrorless.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s talk practical, everyday photography performance based on hands-on shooting:
Portrait Photography
The NX30’s larger sensor and higher resolution provide better skin tone rendition and more creamy bokeh (depth of field) control. Its fast and accurate AF face detection ensures crisp eyes, even in tricky lighting. The G3 is competent for casual portraits but won't deliver the buttery defocus or the crisp autofocus precision professionals seek.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range is a critical factor here. The NX30 delivers stunning shadow detail and highlights retention, perfect for sunrise or sunset captures. Micro Four Thirds’ smaller sensor in the G3 limits dynamic range but its compactness can make lens swapping hassle-free in the field. Weather sealing is absent in both, so caution is advised shooting in inclement conditions.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Here, autofocus speed and burst rate dominate. The NX30’s 9 fps and 247 AF points allow tracking animals and athletes with less hunting or missed shots. The G3’s 4 fps and contrast-detection-only AF can frustrate if your subjects don’t cooperate.
Street Photography
Panasonic’s G3 compact size and lighter lens options win points with inconspicuousness and agility in urban environments. While the NX30 offers superior image quality, its bulkier profile and louder shutter might be less street-friendly.
Macro Photography
Neither camera has dedicated macro focus bracketing or stacking, but the NX30’s precise AF system and sensor resolution help nail critical focus, while the G3’s modest AF can lag. Both rely on compatible macro lenses.
Night and Astrophotography
The NX30 is the clear leader with better high ISO performance and dynamic range. Shooting stars or night cityscapes is viable only with the NX30, while the G3 struggles with noise and limited exposure latitude.
Video Work
The Samsung’s mic input and high-res screen give it an edge for casual video work, but neither camera fits the needs of a modern filmmaker beyond basic clips.
Travel Photography
Fitness and versatility count here. The G3’s lightweight, travel-friendly body, coupled with a vast lens ecosystem, is great for spontaneous shooting. But if image quality and AF speed are your priorities, the NX30 makes more sense, provided you’re okay with the larger size and limited lens choice.
Professional Usage
Neither camera is truly professional-grade in durability or file flexibility, but the Samsung NX30’s better sensor performance and ergonomics make it marginally more appealing for demanding pros on a budget.
Performance Summary at a Glance
A side-by-side scoring review underscores our findings: NX30 leads in almost all technical categories except portability and lens ecosystem. Panasonic G3 nails beginner usability and compactness but lags behind in imaging prowess and autofocus agility.
Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Panasonic Lumix G3 if:
- You want an affordable, lightweight mirrorless ideal for travel, street, or casual shooting.
- You value a rich Micro Four Thirds lens lineup and adaptability.
- You don’t mind slower autofocus or moderate low-light performance.
- You’re on a tighter budget and want a straightforward entry into interchangeable lens cameras.
Buy the Samsung NX30 if:
- You’re after superior image quality, better high ISO performance, and faster burst shooting.
- You want advanced autofocus features for wildlife, sports, or action photography.
- You value a premium viewfinder and screen experience.
- You don’t mind a smaller lens ecosystem in exchange for better sensor performance and handling ergonomics.
Pricing Context
At launch, the Panasonic G3 came in around $500, while the Samsung NX30 was priced closer to $700, reflecting their target audiences and tech. These differences remain relevant today on used markets where both cameras can be found affordably but at varying price points.
Wrapping Up: Experience over Specs - Choose What Feels Right for You
In this matchup, the Samsung NX30’s larger sensor, superior AF system, and advanced ergonomics make it the more competent camera in handling demanding photography situations, while the Panasonic G3 offers simplicity, portability, and an unbeatable lens ecosystem to those starting their photographic journey or seeking a reliable travel companion.
Having spent days shooting side by side with both cameras, I found the NX30 to frequently impress with speed and image quality, whereas the G3’s ease-of-use and lightweight nature made it my pick when roaming busy city streets or hiking light.
Every photographer’s needs differ, and while specs guide us, only real-world use clarifies what clicks with your vision - hopefully, this comparison has helped you get closer to that perfect fit.
Happy shooting!
Disclosure: This review does not endorse any retailer. All camera specs cited are verified from official sources and practical testing over multiple shooting sessions.
Panasonic G3 vs Samsung NX30 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 | Samsung NX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 | Samsung NX30 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-07-11 | 2014-01-03 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine FHD | DRIMeIV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4592 x 3448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,036k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | 0.66x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 11.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps)) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 336 grams (0.74 lb) | 375 grams (0.83 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 84 x 47mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 127 x 96 x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | 77 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | 23.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.6 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | 667 | 1014 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photos | 360 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $500 | $699 |