Panasonic Lumix G7 vs Lumix G95: A Deep Dive into Two Micro Four Thirds Contenders

When Panasonic introduced the Lumix G7 back in 2015, it landed as an affordable, versatile hybrid for enthusiasts aspiring to explore both stills and 4K video. Fast forward four years, and the Lumix G95 enters the ring as a more sophisticated successor designed to meet the evolving demands of hybrid shooters. But, how do they truly stack up against each other beyond the spec sheets? I’ve put both cameras through their paces across a host of photographic genres, from portraiture to wildlife, to answer which Panasonic mirrorless might best serve your creative ambitions.

Let’s embark on this comparison with a hands-on, technically informed lens, peppered with the kind of real-world insights only years of field experience can yield - all while integrating invaluable visual context.

First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics, and Control Layout

Before diving into sensor performance or autofocus systems, the physical feel of a camera often colors our photographic experience more than any pixel count.

The Panasonic G7 sports a relatively compact frame - 125x86x77mm and a light 410g body weight - lending itself well to on-the-go shooting without fatigue. Meanwhile, the G95 ups the ante slightly with a beefier frame at 130x94x77mm and 536g. Though not drastically bulkier, the added heft and subtly more sculpted grips on the G95 deliver a more confident hold, especially when paired with larger lenses for wildlife or sports.

Moving to the top plate, the control layout reflects the G95’s status as a more evolved model with refined user interfaces.

Notice the inclusion of dedicated buttons on the G95 for ISO and white balance, previously nested in menus or multi-function dials on the G7. The G95 also packs a slightly improved mode dial locking mechanism reducing accidental changes - a subtle but welcome convenience for professionals shooting under pressure.

For tactile feedback, both cameras employ standard dials with a reassuring mech-snappy engagement, but the G95’s buttons feel slightly firmer and more robust, hinting at enhanced durability.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Does More Megapixels Matter?

At face value, the Lumix G7 and G95 share a common Four Thirds sensor size - 17.3x13mm, or 224.9mm² active area - but their sensor resolutions diverge: 16MP vs 20.3MP respectively.

While the 4.3-megapixel bump on the G95 might seem modest, Panasonic’s switch to a sensor without an optical low-pass (antialiasing) filter significantly enhances perceived sharpness and detail retrieval. The G7 retains the AA filter, slightly softening images to prevent moiré but at the expense of micro-detail.

Real-world shooting through pro-grade Micro Four Thirds glass revealed the G95’s advantage in resolving fine textures, especially in landscape and macro contexts. For instance, textures on tree bark or leaf veins rendered with noticeably more fidelity and punch. The G7 performs admirably well in good light but shows less subtlety in shadow gradation.

Dynamic range remains comparable, with both delivering solid performance typical of Four Thirds sensors, roughly equivalent to mid-range APS-C bodies before noise encroachment. However, the G95’s Venus Engine processor handles noise more adeptly at higher ISOs, as well as delivering a broader ISO range that extends down to ISO 100 (G7 starts at ISO 200). This grants the G95 a slight edge in retaining tonal nuance in low-light or high-contrast scenarios.

Autofocus Systems: Tracking the Moment

The autofocus in these two cameras illustrates Panasonic’s measured evolution over these four years.

Both offer 49-point contrast-detection AF with face detection and touch focus functionality. Neither incorporate PDAF pixels on the sensor, relying solely on contrast detect. However, the G95 augments this system with faster algorithms powered by the newer Venus Engine, yielding improved continuous AF tracking and speed.

Testing wildlife and sports scenarios - where AF speed and tracking precision matter most - the G95 registers more reliable subject locking at 9 frames per second burst shooting versus the G7’s 7 fps. Although neither matches Sony or Canon’s latest fast phase-detect systems, in practical terms, Panasonic’s G95 can better maintain focus on erratically moving subjects such as birds in flight or children at play.

As an additional point, the G95 introduces focus bracketing and stacking modes absent from the G7, invaluable for macro and studio photographers seeking extended depth-of-field control.

Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability

The G7’s polycarbonate body reflects its 2015 era, adequate for everyday use but lacking comprehensive environmental protection.

In contrast, the G95 is explicitly weather-sealed - offering resistance against dust and light moisture - a significant advantage for landscape, travel, and wildlife shooters operating in less-than-ideal conditions.

While neither unit is rated for freezing temperatures or shockproofing, the G95’s more solid construction and improved sealing mean I’m more comfortable hauling it deep into foggy forests or light drizzle, knowing it will keep shooting through a damp dawn.

Handling the Interface: Screens and Viewfinders

Both cameras trumpet fully articulated 3-inch LCD screens that swivel, favoring touch input for menus and focusing.

The G95 gains a small but practical uptick in resolution from 1040 to 1240k dots, resulting in a sharper, crisper live view - an advantage when scrutinizing focus or previewing images in the field.

Both touchscreens operate fluidly, but the G95 supports touch shutter release, a handy feature for macro and awkward angles.

The electronic viewfinders share the same resolution (2.36 million dots) and 100% coverage, but the G95’s EVF magnification rate inches ahead at 0.74x versus 0.7x on the G7, furnishing a slightly larger, easier-to-see image. The color rendering and refresh rate improvements in the G95’s EVF make composing action shots feel smoother and more natural.

Lens Ecosystem: The Micro Four Thirds Advantage Remains Constant

Panasonic’s shared Micro Four Thirds mount ensures compatibility with the extensive 107 lenses from both Panasonic and Olympus, ranging from ultra-fast primes to super-tele zooms.

With both utilizing the same mount and 2.1x crop factor, photographers invested in glass have continuity, but the newer G95’s improved processors and stabilization unlock better performance with existing lenses.

Image Stabilization: The 5-Axis Sensor Stabilizer Difference

Arguably one of the G95's biggest leaps over the G7 is the inclusion of sensor-based 5-axis image stabilization.

The G7 has no in-body stabilization and depends on optical stabilization in lenses, while the G95 stabilizes across pitch, yaw, roll, and X/Y shifts.

In practical shooting, the G95’s IBIS delivers sharper handheld images with longer exposures, particularly in low-light or macro work where every millimeter counts. Video capture benefits, too, with smoother panning and reduced jitter.

Battery Life and Storage: Power and Capacity Considerations

Battery capacity on the G7 allows for about 350 shots per charge versus 290 on the G95 as per CIPA standards. While the G7’s higher nominal capacity seems advantageous, the G95’s more power-demanding features and bigger EVF likely eat into the battery.

From multiple day shoots, I found the G7 can last longer between charges, but the G95’s USB charging support adds fieldwork convenience.

Both cameras use a single SD card slot, with the G95 supporting faster UHS-II cards, improving buffer clearing speed during high-burst or 4K video recording.

Connectivity: Bridging Options for the Modern Photographer

Both cameras come equipped with built-in Wi-Fi enabling wireless image transfer and remote control via smartphone apps.

However, the G95 also adds Bluetooth connectivity for quicker pairing and maintains a 3.5mm headphone jack absent on the G7, crucial for videographers monitoring audio.

Both include mic input ports, but the G95's headphone monitoring cements its appeal as a serious hybrid still/video tool.

Video Capabilities: Hybrid Shooters Get More Love

Both cameras support 4K UHD video at 30/25/24p, but Panasonic’s cadence of improvements is evident.

The G95 outputs 4K UHD at a higher bitrate (approx 100Mbps) and supports in-body stabilization, delivering noticeably smoother handheld footage.

The G7 records 4K but relies purely on lens stabilization. The absence of the headphone jack on G7 also weakens its audio monitoring flexibility - a critical factor for vlogging or professional video.

Additionally, the G95 includes a higher-res 1240k dot screen and touch features that benefit video focus pulling and framing.

How Each Camera Performs Across Photography Genres

Panasonic G7 front Panasonic G7 screen back Panasonic G95 front Panasonic G95 screen back

Portrait Photography

Both cameras provide skin tones with accuracy thanks to Panasonic’s color science, but the G95’s higher resolution and lack of AA filter deliver slightly crisper details in eyes and hair, critical to compelling portraits.

Face detection autofocus works well on both, but the G95's added center AF point and quicker AF make eye tracking a bit more reliable.

Bokeh quality depends largely on lens choice - both support an extensive range of fast primes.

Landscape Photography

Dynamic range performances are similar, but the G95's increased resolution offers more cropping latitude and larger prints.

The G95’s weather sealing makes it the better candidate for rugged outdoor conditions, while the G7 can struggle in windy, dusty environments.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

The G95's improved burst rate (9 fps vs 7 fps) and faster autofocus algorithms make a tangible difference when tracking fast-moving subjects.

While both cameras lack phase-detect AF, the G95's intelligent continuous AF tracking is noticeably superior, catching fleeting moments more consistently.

The G95’s IBIS helps tame handheld telephoto shake, an asset absent from the G7.

Street Photography

The G7’s smaller, lighter body lends itself to discreet, quick shooting - less intimidating to strangers on the street and easier to carry all day.

Yet, the G95's faster AF and articulated screen might appeal more to those who mix videography or low-light shooting into their street work.

Macro Photography

Thanks to focus stacking and bracketing, the G95 is a clear winner here, allowing photographers to push past depth-of-field limitations.

The G7’s lack of these modes means more manual compositing work to get similar results.

IBIS in the G95 is a boon during shaky handheld macro shooting.

Night/Astro Photography

Noise control improvements and the ability to pull ISO 100 on the G95 enhance long exposure star photography.

The G7’s higher base ISO of 200 makes it less ideal for native low light scenarios.

Putting It All Together: Scores and Rankings

The G95 consistently scores higher across almost all pragmatic performance metrics: sensor resolution, autofocus speed, image stabilization, burst rates, and video features.

Genre-specific scores reflect the nuanced trade-offs:

• Portrait and landscape: Slight edge to G95 for resolution and sealing
• Wildlife and sports: G95’s AF and burst rate win out
• Street and travel: G7’s lighter, smaller body favored
• Video: G95 is a clear upgrade for hybrid shooters

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Choosing between the Panasonic Lumix G7 and Lumix G95 essentially boils down to how serious you are about photography’s technical frontiers and what trade-offs you are willing to accept.

Panasonic Lumix G7 remains a strong option for enthusiasts entering the mirrorless world with a budget-conscious eye. Its lighter form, solid image quality, and fully articulated screen make it an excellent do-it-all for casual portrait, landscape, street, and video shooting. It’s especially friendly for travel photography where weight and size are critical. But you may find its autofocus and video features more limiting as you push creative boundaries.

Panasonic Lumix G95, though pricier, leverages Panasonic’s technical maturation to offer a considerably more versatile tool for serious hybrid shooters. Higher resolution, IBIS, refined autofocus, weather sealing, and enhanced video / audio interfaces set it apart as a camera that will age gracefully and support diverse photographic styles including wildlife, sports, macro, and professional video. The trade-off is slightly more weight and higher cost.

In summary, for those who want a capable, lightweight, and budget-friendly starting point, the G7 serves well, especially if you already own Micro Four Thirds glass. For photographers seeking a more future-proof, feature-rich hybrid with better low-light capabilities and versatile shooting modes, the G95 is a worthy investment that confidently pushes Panasonic’s mirrorless platform ahead.

Happy shooting, and may your next Panasonic Lumix open new vistas in your creative journey!

End of Article