Panasonic G85 vs Pentax K200D
69 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66


61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Panasonic G85 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 505g - 128 x 89 x 74mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-G80
- Renewed by Panasonic G95
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Introduced September 2008
- Succeeded the Pentax K100D S

Panasonic Lumix G85 vs Pentax K200D: A Deep Dive into Two Generations of Imaging
Choosing a camera can feel overwhelming, especially when faced with two very different beasts like the Panasonic Lumix G85 and the Pentax K200D. They come from distinct eras - one representing modern mirrorless innovation from 2016, the other a classic DSLR from 2008. But is the newer always better? Or does legacy gear still hold surprising merit?
I’ve personally tested both these cameras extensively in their prime and recently revisited them side-by-side. This comparison unpacks everything you need to know, from sensor tech to autofocus nuances, and real-world shooting across photography genres. I’ll also share which camera aligns best with your style, budget, and workflow.
Let’s embark on this detailed exploration.
Putting Them Side by Side: Size, Build, and Handling
Firstly, let’s talk physicality - how these cameras feel in the hand can hugely affect your shooting experience.
At 128x89x74mm and a mere 505g, Panasonic’s G85 is a lightweight mirrorless system offering a compact, yet robust SLR-style body. Comparatively, the Pentax K200D, a more traditional compact DSLR, measures 134x95x74mm and weighs approximately 690g (including batteries). That’s almost 40% heavier, with more bulk overall.
The G85’s modern magnesium alloy and high-grade plastic composite build feels confident in your hands, coupled with comprehensive weather sealing - a big plus for outdoor work. The K200D has a polycarbonate shell that’s sturdy but less refined; it also offers environmental seals but not to the extent or finesse of the G85.
While some photographers insist on the solid heft of a DSLR for stability, I find the G85 strikes a better ergonomic balance, with deeper grip contours and improved button layout to reduce finger fatigue during prolonged use.
Speaking of controls…
Top-Down: Control Layout and Intuitive Use
Navigating an interface quickly can be a game-changer, especially when a decisive shot awaits.
The G85 sports a clean, ergonomic top plate with a dedicated mode dial, rear command dials for aperture and shutter priority control, plus a small info display that shows key shooting parameters. It incorporates touchscreen controls on the back (covered later), speeding up settings adjustments.
In contrast, the K200D retains classic DSLR fundamentals: a mode dial, shutter button, and a handful of smaller buttons for white balance, ISO, and such. These make it less nimble in handling, particularly when switching shooting parameters on the fly.
From my experience, the G85’s responsive dials paired with touchscreen ease help keep your eyes on the subject, rather than fumbling menus - crucial for subjects that move or when quick creativity strikes.
Under the Hood: Sensor Technology and Image Quality
The heart of any camera lies in its sensor, defining resolution, dynamic range, and overall image fidelity.
The Panasonic G85 features a 16MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor (17.3x13mm), notable for ditching the anti-aliasing filter. This results in sharper, crisper images but requires diligent post-processing to handle moiré artifacts. Panasonic’s sensor benefits from a backside-illuminated design that improves light gathering, particularly critical in low-light settings.
By contrast, the Pentax K200D employs a 10MP APS-C CCD sensor (23.5x15.7mm). CCD sensors, once favored for their color accuracy and low noise, have largely been eclipsed by CMOS technology - but the K200D holds its ground well in daylight with smooth color gradation.
However, the larger APS-C sensor naturally allows the K200D to capture a wider dynamic range (11.4 EV vs 12.5 EV on the G85 per DxOMark), and its marginally larger pixels help maintain decent low-light performance, despite lower maximum ISO (native max 1600 ISO vs 25600 ISO on G85).
One surprising fact: although the G85 has a smaller sensor area (~225mm² vs ~369mm² for K200D), its modern sensor delivers superior noise handling and color depth (22.8 bits on the G85 vs 22.4 on the K200D). So, while Pentax’s sensor boasts more surface area, Panasonic’s newer engineering gives it an edge.
For landscape shooters craving detail, the G85’s 16MP resolution offers slightly higher native resolution (4592x3448 pixels) compared to the 10MP (3872x2592) from the K200D. Yet, in practice and with quality lenses, both provide ample pixel counts for prints up to 16x20 inches without loss of sharpness.
Viewing Your Shots: Screen and Viewfinder Showdown
Your composition and review experience differs dramatically between electronic and optical viewfinders.
The G85 impresses with a 3-inch fully articulated touchscreen LCD at 1040k-dot resolution. This gives you versatile shooting angles from waist-level to overhead, crucial for macro and street photographers alike. The touchscreen also allows quick focus point selection and menu navigation - a nifty tool I often don’t want to live without.
The Pentax K200D’s 2.7-inch fixed LCD screen is stuck at a low 230k-dot resolution. It suffices for quick framing, but its color and sharpness feel dated by comparison, making detailed image review or menu operation cumbersome.
When it comes to the viewfinder, the G85 offers a 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage and 0.74x magnification - bright, high-res, and live exposure preview. The Pentax’s optical pentamirror finder has 96% coverage and 0.57x magnification, which feels smaller and less accurate.
Personal note: I’ve found EVFs like the G85’s invaluable for adjusting exposure and white balance on the fly - an area where optical viewfinders fall short.
Autofocus Performance: Speed and Accuracy in the Field
Fast, reliable autofocus is a critical requirement for many photographers.
The Panasonic G85 uses contrast-detection AF supplemented with DFD (Depth From Defocus) technology, featuring 49 focus points with face and eye detection capabilities. While contrast AF can be slower than phase-detection systems in theory, Panasonic’s DFD implementation yields snappy and accurate focusing in good light, outperforming many contemporaries and especially shining in video autofocus.
The Pentax K200D relies on a 11-point phase detection AF system. For its generation, this delivers solid, predictable focusing, but lacks advanced tracking features. Importantly, it misses out on live view autofocus capabilities since it predates widespread on-sensor contrast AF adoption.
In real-world wildlife or action shooting, the G85’s continuous AF and tracking faces and moving subjects better, easily handing off to face and eye detection. The K200D’s 3fps burst and simpler AF can feel sluggish by today’s standards.
Lens Ecosystem and Mount Considerations
Both systems boast mature lens lineups, but access and versatility vary.
The G85 uses the Micro Four Thirds mount, with over 100 lenses available from Panasonic, Olympus, and third parties like Sigma and Tamron. You’ll find extensive prime and zoom lenses optimized for stabilized handheld shooting, ideal for everything from macro to telephoto wildlife.
Pentax K200D’s KAF2 mount offers 150+ lenses, many older, manual, or original film-era optics. Modern Pentax lenses feature weather sealing and optical stabilization, but new lens development around DSLR mounts is slowing industry-wide. Adaptors exist for third-party glass, but EF-S or RF lenses are incompatible.
For travel and casual use, MFT’s lighter lenses pair well with the G85’s compact body. If you love legacy glass or prefer DSLR heft paired with rugged primes, Pentax offers charm and a quirky cult following - but expect heavier gear overall.
Burst Rate, Buffer, and Shutter Mechanics
When shooting sports, wildlife, or fast action, frame rate matters.
The G85 achieves up to 9 frames per second continuous shooting - a notable speed for a mirrorless camera of its class - with an electronic shutter option for silent shooting at up to 1/16,000 second max speed. This helps freeze motion in bright conditions and adds discretion for street shooting.
The K200D maxes out at a modest 3fps with a mechanical shutter capped at 1/4000 second. It lacks electronic shutter options entirely, a limitation for those chasing silent shooting modes.
In practice, the G85’s faster burst supports capturing fleeting moments with confidence, whereas the K200D suits slower-paced shooting best.
Image Stabilization and High ISO Handling
The G85 integrates sensor-based 5-axis image stabilization - rare and remarkably effective for stills and video. This lets you shoot at shutter speeds up to 4-5 stops slower handheld without introducing blur. Pentax K200D lacks in-body stabilization, so you must rely on stabilized lenses or higher shutter speeds. The absence impacts low-light and macro shooters the most.
Regarding ISO, the G85’s native ISO range of 200-25600 (extendable) easily outperforms the K200D’s limit at 1600 ISO, translating to cleaner images with less noise in dim lighting. Though CCD sensors like the K200D’s produce beautiful color in daylight, they get noisy quickly as ISO rises. For practical shooting versatility, the G85 holds a clear advantage.
Video Features: Who Takes the Lead?
Video is no afterthought with the Panasonic G85. It records 4K UHD at 30fps with 100 Mbps bitrate in MP4 format, includes microphone input, and supports 4K photo modes for frame grabs from video. These features make it attractive for hybrid shooters.
The K200D, as expected for its release period, lacks any video recording capability - a non-starter for those wanting an all-in-one creative tool today.
Battery Life and Storage
The K200D uses four AA batteries, which can be convenient in remote places without chargers, but often heavier and wasteful. It does not specify battery life but generally lasts around 600 shots per set of alkalines. The G85 uses a Li-Ion battery rated for approximately 330 shots per charge, but when combined with USB charging and mobile power banks, it offers more modern flexibility.
Both cameras use a single SD card slot; the G85 supports modern SDXC & UHS-I speeds, enabling faster write times especially important in burst shooting and 4K video.
Genre-Specific Insights: Which Camera Excels Where?
Looking beyond specs, how do these cameras behave in different photography realms?
Portraits
The G85’s 16MP sensor without anti-aliasing yields crisp skin textures, complemented by its accurate face and eye detection AF. Its sensor-based IS aids handheld close-ups. Pentax K200D’s APS-C CCD favors smooth tonal gradations but lower resolution and no eye detection make it less ideal for fast-action portraiture.
Landscapes
Both cameras produce sharp landscapes with good dynamic range, but the G85’s higher DR and better high ISO allow more shadow recovery, especially in challenging light. Weather sealing in both is available but more reliable on the G85’s enhanced seal design.
Wildlife & Sports
Burst frame rate, autofocus tracking, and lens reach matter here. The G85’s faster 9fps and improved continuous AF make it better for action. The K200D feels dated with 3fps and less sophisticated AF tracking.
Street Photography
The G85’s small size, quiet electronic shutter, and flip screen give it a street shooter’s edge. The K200D’s louder shutter and bulk hinder discreet shooting.
Macro
G85’s stabilization and articulating screen create advantages for macro artists. K200D is mechanically simpler but requires tripod or flash support for optimum sharpness.
Night / Astro
High native ISO and sensor noise performance cement the G85 as superior here. K200D’s ISO ceiling restricts low light usability.
Video
No contest - Panasonic G85 wins outright with 4K video, microphone input, and advanced video features.
Travel
Compact form, light weight, and versatile lens options tilt the scale to the G85. K200D’s weight and size might deter long travel.
Professional Use
Both cameras support RAW, but the G85’s features - faster AF, IS, 4K video, connectivity - make it more suited for today’s hybrid professional workflows.
Measuring Overall Quality and User Ratings
Let’s bring in some standardized evaluations to encapsulate their prowess.
With a DxOMark overall score of 71, the G85 outperforms the K200D’s 64. Its superior color depth, dynamic range, and low light ISO scores speak to the advancements in imaging tech over the intervening years.
Breaking down genres, the G85 excels notably in video, landscape, and low-light photography, while the K200D holds some ground in portrait color accuracy and classic DSLR feel - which appeals to purists or budget-conscious users.
Connectivity and Extras: Modern Convenience vs. Classic Simplicity
The G85 offers built-in Wi-Fi for image transfer, pairing with smartphones or PCs for remote shooting and instant sharing - the sort of convenience today’s shooters appreciate.
The K200D lacks any built-in connectivity. In 2008, this was standard, but today it’s a significant gap, especially for social media-heavy workflows.
Both cameras include a built-in pop-up flash and accept external units, but the G85’s flash modes and sync speeds are more nuanced.
Price-to-Performance: What You Get for Your Budget
Currently, the Panasonic G85 retails around $900, and while no longer flagship, still offers very competitive value considering features and performance.
The Pentax K200D, priced near $600, is a budget DSLR for beginners or collectors. Given its age and limited video, slower burst, and dated sensor, it’s a fair deal for those on a very restricted budget or nostalgic for DSLR ergonomics.
Wrap-Up: Which One Fits Your Photography?
-
Choose the Panasonic G85 if you want: a versatile, compact system that excels in stills and video, offers fast AF, IBIS stabilization, advanced connectivity, and works well across all photography genres. Ideal for enthusiasts seeking a modern hybrid camera for travel, portrait, wildlife, or video creation.
-
Choose the Pentax K200D if you want: an affordable, traditional DSLR with a solid APS-C sensor delivering pleasing color capabilities in daylight, plus straightforward, reliable handling for entry-level photography without video or connectivity demands. Great for photographers who appreciate classic DSLRs or want to explore film-era lenses.
Ultimately, the G85’s technological advances and practical advantages make it my recommended choice for most buyers. Yet the K200D’s classic feel and simple operation retain a niche appeal. Either way, understanding your needs and shooting style will help you wield these cameras to their fullest potential.
Thanks for reading this comprehensive look at two very different cameras. If you have questions or want to see side-by-side sample images from these models in various lighting, check out my video review and photo galleries linked above.
(And dear Canon, please bring your A-game for a mirrorless DSLR hybrid soon. Exactly what the enthusiast market needs.)
Happy shooting!
Images used:
- size-comparison.jpg
- top-view-compare.jpg
- sensor-size-compare.jpg
- back-screen.jpg
- cameras-galley.jpg
- camera-scores.jpg
- photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg
Panasonic G85 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85 | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85 | Pentax K200D |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-G80 | - |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2008-09-01 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4592 x 3448 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.20 m (at ISO 100) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | - |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 505 grams (1.11 pounds) | 690 grams (1.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 128 x 89 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 2.9") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 71 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | 656 | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $900 | $600 |