Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
89 Imaging
48 Features
54 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e136/8e1367b10b9c9ceac2995dc3e01643b0d0729022" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0919f/0919f1115fdda8c239848792f287f46b2d1eed67" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front"
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 267g - 108 x 67 x 37mm
- Revealed April 2012
- Previous Model is Panasonic GF3
- Renewed by Panasonic GF6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Panasonic GF5 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. The image resolution of the GF5 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very similar but the GF5 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The GF5 was manufactured 2 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the GF5 matches up versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are viewable at Panasonic GF5 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF5 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GF5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | ![]() | November 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Panasonic GF5
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | GF5 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic GF5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GF5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Panasonic GF5 comes with outer measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 267 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic GF5 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the GF5 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca06a/ca06a68eca89b94c54d55b8a7d5608fb976ae41e" alt="Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GF5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 89 and 77 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b18/40b180ce3f0260b8c46ef9393f45a1359066d306" alt="Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The photograph here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GF5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The GF5 comes with the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF tougher. The newer GF5 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4d75/f4d7539c96d0711cc1fc5cd9572439e795695355" alt="Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison"
Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e086/7e086950b84198746d6f878b10ed7db8d94db010" alt="Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Panasonic GF5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-04-05 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine FHD | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 160 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.30 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 267 gr (0.59 lb) | 453 gr (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 50 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 320 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $600 | $566 |