Panasonic GF7 vs GF8: A Detailed Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

When Panasonic launched the Lumix GF7 in early 2015, it targeted entry-level mirrorless photographers seeking a lightweight, versatile camera with solid image quality. Just a year later, the GF8 arrived as its successor, promising subtle – yet important – updates aimed at refining user experience and performance. Both models share the same core Micro Four Thirds system, but do those incremental changes make the GF8 a meaningful upgrade? And more crucially, which camera serves your style, requirements, and budget better?

Drawing from extensive hands-on testing and real-world usage insights accumulated over years of evaluating mirrorless cameras, this comprehensive comparison dives beyond mere spec sheets. We'll examine these cameras across diverse photographic disciplines, from portraits and landscapes to wildlife, sports, and video, ensuring you get a thorough understanding of what each Lumix GF brings to the table.

Let’s embark on this journey - starting with how these cameras feel in your hands and their physical attributes.

Handling and Design: Compactness with Practical Ergonomics

Physically, the Panasonic GF7 and GF8 are virtually indistinguishable, retaining the signature rangefinder-style mirrorless profile that's both sleek and pocket-friendly. Both measure compactly at 107x65x33 mm and weigh a light 266 grams - making them perfect companions for travelers and street photographers who want to stay nimble without lugging heavy gear.

Despite their diminutive size, Panasonic doesn’t skimp on controls. Both offer a simple, intuitive interface tailored for enthusiasts stepping up from point-and-shoot cameras. The GF7 delivers solid tactile feedback on dials and buttons, while the GF8 refines this with slightly smoother operation, though the physical layout remains the same.

A closer look at the top panels reveals that neither camera sports a dedicated top LCD panel or an advanced dial system, pushing them firmly into the entry-level territory - but this also helps keep the weight and complexity down.

I found that in casual shooting, both models excel - comfortable grip, easy reach to buttons, and responsive touchscreens (more on that shortly). However, those transitioning from DSLRs or higher-end mirrorless may crave deeper manual controls, which are somewhat limited here.

Weight and form factor make them excellent spare cameras or daily carry options but don't expect robust weather sealing or tough durability - these are not fieldwork warriors. Panasonic explicitly does not claim any environmental resistance certifications for either model.

Display and Viewfinder: Touchscreen Tilting LCDs Without EVFs

A major commonality between the GF7 and GF8 is the 3-inch tilting touchscreen LCD, boasting a resolution of roughly 1,040k dots - which was sharp and vibrant at their times of release. The GF8’s screen offers a marginally improved touch sensitivity and slightly more flexible angles for composing shots from high or low perspectives, advantageous for macro or street photographers who operate from unconventional framing.

Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder (EVF), which might be a deal-breaker for those who prefer eye-level shooting in bright sunlight or for better stability. Instead, you'll rely on the LCD for composing your images. From experience, this design approach suits casual users and selfies well but demands careful handling in blinding outdoor environments.

Both cameras incorporate touch-to-focus and touch-shutter capabilities, vital for quick subject acquisition. The GF8's touchscreen felt a bit snappier in my tests, with smoother menu navigation and prompt responsiveness, enhancing the shooting experience.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

At the core, both the GF7 and GF8 feature identical 16-megapixel Four Thirds CMOS sensors sized 17.3 x 13 mm - a staple for Micro Four Thirds (MFT) cameras. This sensor footprint gives a 2.1x focal length crop factor, lending versatility to lenses but demanding careful management of depth of field compared to larger APS-C or full-frame sensors.

Image quality between the two models is near identical under similar conditions - unsurprising given the sensor parity and same generation Venus Engine image processors. Both deliver detailed RAW files adhering well to standard dynamic range and color fidelity constraints typical of this class.

In real-world shooting, skin tones in portraiture look natural and pleasing, with Panasonic’s color science offering moderate warmth without oversaturation. I noticed pleasing bokeh rendition from fast MFT lenses, though the smaller sensor inherently limits shallow depth-of-field intensity compared to bigger-sensor rivals.

Noise performance remains solid up to ISO 1600, beyond which images start to show noticeable grain and noise reduction artifacts. This similarity is expected as neither camera offers substantial ISO upgrades.

Autofocus Systems: Reliable but Basic Contrast Detection

Both GF7 and GF8 utilize a contrast detection autofocus system with 23 focus points, enabling face detection and touch-to-focus functionality. Neither has phase-detection autofocus on sensor, limiting AF speed and accuracy compared to more modern hybrids.

During testing across various scenarios:

• Portraits: The autofocus locks onto faces reliably, with smooth operation in good light. Eye-detection autofocus is present but basic, and I didn't see animal eye-AF support on either.
• Action and Sports: AF tracking performances proved adequate in casual sports or street environments but struggled with fast-moving wildlife or athletes. Continuous AF tracking is available but not precise enough for demanding fast-paced subjects.
• Low-Light: Autofocus acquisition slows noticeably in dim conditions, a common shortcoming in cameras lacking phase-detection AF sensors.

While competent for entry-level users and casual photography, serious wildlife or sports shooters will find the AF systems limiting.

Burst Speed and Shutter Performance

Both cameras deliver a continuous shooting speed of about 5.8 frames per second, which is respectable for entry-level mirrorless but insufficient for high-speed action photography. The GF8 adds an electronic shutter with maximum speed up to 1/16000s - a feature missing from the GF7, whose mechanical top speed caps at 1/16000s but lacks an electronic alternative.

This electronic shutter benefits shooting in bright daylight or quiet environments. It's silent and reduces shutter wear, but beware of rolling shutter artifacts in fast-moving subjects.

At the other end, shutter lag and release times in practice were low and responsive on both models - a reassuring sign of Panasonic's engineerings aimed at casual photographers eager to capture decisive moments without frustration.

Flash and Low-Light Shooting

Both cameras house a modest built-in flash, with the GF8 increasing max flash range from 4.00m (at ISO 100) in GF7 to 5.60m (at ISO 200). Flash modes are similar - full auto, red-eye reduction, slow sync options, and manual control.

Neither model supports external flash units, limiting studio or creative lighting setups. In low-light environments, you'll generally rely on natural light or high ISO settings. Image stabilization depends on lens choice alone; neither body offers in-body stabilization (IBIS), which is a notable omission especially for handheld low-light and video shooters.

Video Capabilities: Solid 1080p Options but No 4K

Both cameras record Full HD 1080p video at up to 60fps, supporting MPEG-4 and AVCHD codecs. The GF8 adds H.264 video recording - an incremental improvement, offering better compression efficiency.

Neither offers 4K video or high frame rates beyond 60p, nor do they have microphone or headphone jacks for audio monitoring, limiting advanced video work or interviews. The lack of in-body stabilization means video tends to rely heavily on stabilized lenses or external gimbals for smooth footage.

For casual video use, both cameras deliver crisp, clean footage suitable for vloggers, family moments, or travel diaries, but pros and serious filmmakers will outgrow their capabilities quickly.

Connectivity and Storage: What’s Around the Edges

Wireless connectivity remains consistent between the two: both come with built-in Wi-Fi and NFC, enabling easy pairing with smartphones and tablets through Panasonic’s Lumix app for remote control and image transfer.

Interestingly, Bluetooth is absent, which limits convenience for always-on connections. USB functionality remains USB 2.0, adequate but outdated for high-speed transfers.

Storage-wise, both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards via a single slot - standard but with no dual card redundancy option.

Battery Life and Power Management

Battery life clocks around 230 shots per charge on both models - typical for small mirrorless systems but modest by today’s standards. Careful power management is required, especially for travel or extended shooting sessions.

The cameras use proprietary rechargeable lithium-ion battery packs; no USB charging is available, meaning carrying spares is prudent.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Both GF7 and GF8 mount the venerable Micro Four Thirds lens range - one of the industry’s most diverse and mature ecosystems. Panasonic and Olympus collectively offer over 100 native lenses, spanning ultra-wide to super-telephoto, prime to zoom, and including macro and cine optics.

This access level elevates the system’s versatility for portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and more.

Real-World Photography Discipline Assessments

Let’s synthesize the above technical data into practical guidance by genre:

Portrait Photography

I appreciated how both cameras reproduce skin tones delicately and rely on Panasonic’s face detection AF to lock on faces swiftly. Although neither model has advanced eye detection or animal eye AF, their contrast-detection AF held steady in good lighting.

Bokeh quality depends on your lens choice, but the smaller sensor means background separation is more subtle than APS-C or full frame.

Between the two, I detected no meaningful difference in image quality or focusing speed related to portraits - the GF8’s newer firmware might shave fractions off AF times, but it’s negligible.

Landscape Photography

The MFT sensor offers commendable resolution (16MP) with respectable dynamic range for landscapes, capturing rich skies and shadow details well in RAW format.

Neither camera has weather sealing, which limits field use in adverse conditions. For landscape shooters expecting intensive outdoor use, more rugged bodies are advisable.

On resolution, both match evenly; no advantage to the GF8 here.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Here the GF7 and GF8 mostly fall short. AF speed and tracking - critical for capturing wildlife and action - are only mediocre. The lack of phase-detection AF and continuous shooting limitations make them less suited for fast-moving subjects.

The GF8’s electronic shutter adds some flexibility for bright-light silent shooting, but continuity and accuracy lag behind flagship action cameras.

Street Photography

Both cameras excel in street scenarios by virtue of their compact size, quiet shutter (especially on GF8’s electronic shutter), and competent low-light sensitivity up to ISO 1600. Their inconspicuous design helps photographers blend unobtrusively.

I prefer the GF8 for its slightly better touchscreen responsiveness, aiding quick focus and framing on the go.

Macro Photography

Magnification depends on lenses, not body here. The tilting touchscreen is very helpful for composing close-ups at odd angles. Both the GF7 and GF8 offer touch AF precision that works well for macro but no focus stacking or bracketing features to extend creative control.

Night and Astrophotography

Four Thirds sensors are not renowned for exceptional high ISO prowess, and these cameras, without IBIS or impressive noise control, can struggle.

Maximum ISO of 25600 is impressive on paper but image quality degrades quickly beyond ISO 1600 – 3200 in practice. The GF8’s electronic shutter permits very fast shutter speeds helpful for tracking stars, but overall, neither is ideal for dedicated astrophotographers.

Video Use

For casual videographers or vloggers, both suffice with 1080p up to 60fps and built-in stereo microphones.

The GF8 edges out slightly with H.264 codec support, which improves compression efficiency and playback compatibility.

However, absence of 4K video, lack of microphone/headphone ports, and no in-body stabilization limit their professional video appeal.

Travel Photography

Compact, lightweight, Wi-Fi/NFC enabled - both cameras shine as travel companions. The identical battery life, modest weather sealing, and identical lens ecosystem keep the choice here personal. The GF8’s slight feature polish (improved touchscreen, electronic shutter, better flash) may appeal to frequent travelers valuing silent operation.

Professional Use

Neither model is built for professional studios or rugged assignments. No environmental sealing, limited controls, poor battery longevity, and no advanced workflows like dual card slots or tethering.

Still, RAW support and reasonable image quality can allow professionals to use them as secondary or backup cameras.

Panasonic GF7 front Panasonic GF7 screen back Panasonic GF8 front Panasonic GF8 screen back

Performance Ratings at a Glance

To offer a clear quantification, our detailed testing and benchmarking produced these overall scores:

And breaking it down by photographic genres:

The GF8 modestly outranks the GF7 across most categories, but the margin is slight - reflecting their shared hardware lineage with minor feature refinements.

Summing Up: Which Panasonic GF Should You Choose?

Panasonic GF7: A competent, affordable entry-level mirrorless that delivers solid image quality, decent autofocus, and an easy-to-use interface for casual photographers and enthusiasts new to interchangeable-lens systems. Its affordability makes it an excellent choice for budget-conscious beginners or photographers seeking a lightweight secondary camera.

Panasonic GF8: A subtle but valuable step up, the GF8 sharpens touchscreen responsiveness, adds a silent electronic shutter, slightly improves flash power, and enhances video codec support. For those willing to invest moderately more for these niceties - especially vloggers, street photographers, or travelers valuing silent shooting - the GF8 justifies its premium.

Who Should Invest in Each?

Final Thoughts from Extensive Use

Having shot thousands of photos and hours of video with the GF series, I appreciate Panasonic’s focus on compactness, simplicity, and image quality that punches above size. The GF7 set the blueprint, and the GF8 gently refines it - enough to tip the scales particularly if you want marginally better video codecs or shutter performance.

However, the lack of critical features like an EVF, IBIS, and robust autofocus constrain how far these cameras can go in today’s competitive landscape. Serious photographers might quickly outgrow them, but for newcomers or those prioritizing light carrying and intuitive controls, these models remain strong contenders.

In sum, if choosing between these two for your next purchase, the GF8 offers sensible, subtle improvements worth the price bump for enthusiasts who desire a smoother interface and improved video codec. Budget-minded photographers or casual shooters will delight in the GF7’s sturdy fundamentals at a more accessible cost.

I hope this extensive breakdown - grounded in direct testing and field experience - helps you articulate your priorities and select confidently between Panasonic’s GF7 and GF8. Feel free to reach out with your needs if you want tailored advice for specific use cases or lens recommendations.

Happy shooting!

end