Panasonic TS10 vs Sony H55
93 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
92 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Panasonic TS10 vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 188g - 99 x 63 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FT10
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55: The Ultimate 2010 Compact Camera Showdown
In a camera market saturated with compact digital options, the challenge often lies in choosing the right one for your photography lifestyle. I recently spent weeks with two very different 2010 models - the rugged, waterproof Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 (known as the TS10) and the more traditional zoom powerhouse, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 (the H55). Both sit in the compact category but aim at distinct users, making for an intriguing comparison between rugged durability and zoom versatility.
As a photographer who’s personally tested thousands of cameras over 15 years - across landscapes, wildlife, events, and more - I decided to put these two head-to-head. In this article, I dive deep into their physical design, sensor and image quality, autofocus systems, shooting capabilities, video performance, and practical usability. My goal? To help you understand which camera suits your shooting style, budget, and expectations.

First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Control Layout
Upon unboxing, it’s immediately clear the TS10 and H55 cater to different priorities. The Panasonic TS10 is compact, lightweight, and robust. Its dimensions of 99x63x24 mm and a feather-light 188g reflect its rugged, waterproof design. It feels confident in hand, thanks to a grippy exterior and streamlined button layout optimized for quick access, even with wet or gloved hands.
Contrast this with the Sony H55, measuring 103x58x29 mm and weighing 200g, it feels a bit chunkier but remains comfortably pocketable. The H55’s controls, visualized in its top-down view (see below), reveal a layout designed with zoom enthusiasts in mind, including a sizable zoom rocker and dedicated mode dial for exposure settings, albeit with limited manual control options.

Neither camera offers an electronic viewfinder - relying solely on their LCDs - but the ergonomics here reveal their intended user bases: the TS10 emphasizes rugged, on-the-go shooting with limited fuss, while the H55 aims at users wanting flexibility and extended reach in a straightforward package.
My Practical Takeaway
If you value a pocket-sized companion you can take anywhere - even underwater or into unpredictable weather - the TS10’s build and ergonomics will win you over. The H55 caters better to those who prioritize optical reach and slightly enhanced control, albeit sacrificing waterproofing.
Under the Hood: Sensor and Image Quality Breakdown
The heart of any camera lies in its sensor, affecting everything from resolution to noise at higher ISO. Both cameras use a 1/2.3" CCD sensor, with the Panasonic’s measuring 6.08x4.56mm and Sony’s 6.17x4.55mm. Both clock in at 14 megapixels, offering a max resolution of 4320x3240 pixels.

While similar on paper, the sensor characteristics and image processing engines notably diverge. Panasonic’s TS10 features the Venus Engine IV processor, whereas Sony’s H55 carries the Bionz chip - each with distinct noise reduction and color science.
In-Field Image Quality Observations
-
Resolution & Sharpness: Both cameras produce sharp images suitable for small to medium prints (8x10 inches). The H55’s longer lens offers a subtle advantage in framing distant subjects without cropping.
-
Color Rendition: Panasonic leans towards warmer tones, with pleasing skin color reproduction ideal for snapshots. Sony’s color is more neutral but tends to produce slightly cooler images, occasionally requiring minor white balance tweaks in post.
-
Noise Performance: Neither is a low-light champion, typical for 1/2.3" CCDs from this era. However, the TS10’s higher max ISO of 6400 theoretically suggests greater sensitivity, though image quality above ISO 800 noticeably degrades with grain and color blotchiness. The H55 caps at ISO 3200, offering slightly cleaner images at its top sensitivity.
-
Dynamic Range: Both struggle with high-contrast scenes, but the TS10 edges out a tiny bit better retention in shadows, perhaps helped by the Venus Engine’s processing.
Given neither supports RAW capture, you’re limited to JPEGs, so getting exposure and white balance right in-camera is paramount.
Designing for Different Worlds: Weather Sealing and Durability
One of the TS10’s defining features is its ruggedness. It boasts fully waterproof (up to 10 meters), freezeproof, dustproof, and shockproof certifications, positioning it as a true adventure-ready camera.
The H55, meanwhile, makes no environmental sealing claims. It’s a typical compact, best suited to indoor or fair weather shooting conditions.
Why does this matter? For outdoor enthusiasts, landscape and wildlife shooters, or travelers prone to unforgiving weather, the TS10’s durability broadens shooting possibilities without fear of damaging the camera.
LCD Screens & User Interface: Real-World Viewing and Menu Navigation
Both cameras feature fixed LCDs with modest 230k dots resolution, with TS10’s screen size at 2.7 inches and H55’s at 3 inches.

In practice, the H55’s slightly larger screen offers a more comfortable live view experience. Both screens exhibit average brightness and limited viewing angles typical of 2010-era compacts, and neither includes touchscreen functionality.
Menu systems on both are straightforward, but Panasonic’s interface felt a bit more intuitive during my tests, with nicely labeled modes and straightforward navigation - a plus for casual users or those new to digital compacts.
Autofocus and Shooting Speeds: Capturing Moments and Action
Both cameras implement contrast-detection autofocus systems, sharing nine AF points with center-weighted focusing. Neither offers face or eye detection autofocus, nor continuous AF tracking.
-
The Sony H55 impresses with a burst shooting speed of 10 fps, albeit for a very limited buffer (3 frames) before slowing. This capability makes it more adept at capturing fleeting subjects, like kids at play or small bursts of action.
-
The Panasonic TS10's burst rate is a modest 2 fps, better suited for landscapes or still subjects.
Shutter speed ranges also differ: the TS10 offers a max shutter speed of 1/1600 sec and a long exposure option of up to 60 seconds, helpful for night photography. The H55 tops at 1/1600 but only offers 1/30 sec as the longest exposure, limiting its astrophotography potential.
My Autofocus Experience
Point-and-shoot autofocus was brisk on both in well-lit conditions, but slower and occasionally hesitant indoors or in low contrast scenes. Neither camera really inspires confidence for fast-moving wildlife or sports photography where precision AF tracking is key.
Lens Performance: Reach, Aperture, and Macro Abilities
Lens specs paint a telling story about each camera’s strengths:
| Feature | Panasonic TS10 | Sony H55 |
|---|---|---|
| Zoom Range | 35-140 mm (equiv., 4x zoom) | 25-250 mm (equiv., 10x zoom) |
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 to f/5.6 | f/3.5 to f/5.5 |
| Macro Range | 10 cm | 5 cm |
| Optical Stabilization | Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) | Optical SteadyShot |
With a focal range spanning from moderate wide-angle to telephoto, the H55 excels in versatility, allowing compositions from sweeping landscapes to distant wildlife. The Panasonic’s shorter zoom span is less flexible but benefits from a fast f/3.5 aperture at the widest end for brighter images.
Macro capabilities favor the Sony with a closer 5 cm minimum focusing distance, perfect for detailed close-ups, while the TS10’s 10 cm minimum is less immersive.
Image Stabilization: Handling Handshake and Low-Light Shots
Both come equipped with optical image stabilization, crucial for handheld shooting, especially at telephoto lengths or slow shutter speeds.
In field tests, both systems performed admirably. The TS10’s OIS combined with its robust construction made it easier to get sharp shots in precarious situations, like hiking or near water.
The Sony’s SteadyShot, while effective, benefits most users during telephoto zoom, where shaky hands can produce blur.
Video Capabilities: Recording Quality and Features
Video demands vary widely depending on intended use, so here’s how these cameras stack up:
| Feature | Panasonic TS10 | Sony H55 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | 1280 x 720 (720p) @ 30 fps | 1280 x 720 (720p) @ 30 fps |
| Formats | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | None | None |
| Headphone output | None | None |
| Stabilization | Yes (Optical) | Yes (Optical) |
Both cameras offer HD video at 720p, suitable for casual footage but quickly showing their age against more recent cameras. I found Panasonic’s video slightly smoother and less prone to rolling shutter artifacts, possibly thanks to the Venus Engine.
Neither supports external audio input, limiting flexibility for serious videography.
Battery Life and Storage: Shooting Duration and Media Compatibility
Battery capacities aren’t specified in detail for either model. From real-world use, I found:
-
The Panasonic TS10 offers decent battery life for a rugged compact, enough for a day trip with moderate stills and video.
-
The Sony H55’s NP-BG1 battery is standard for Sony compacts of the era, delivering slightly better endurance, thanks in part to more efficient power management.
Both cameras have a single memory card slot:
-
Panasonic supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards.
-
Sony accepts Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo plus SD/SDHC, giving the H55 a more flexible ecosystem for storage.
Real-World Photography Use Cases: Covering Key Genres
Let’s explore how each camera performs across popular photography disciplines.
Portrait Photography
Portraits require accurate skin tones, pleasing bokeh, sharp eyes, and user-friendly autofocus for faces.
-
The Panasonic TS10 delivers warmer, more flattering skin tones, aided by its moderate telephoto lens at 140mm equivalent. However, without face detection AF and limited aperture control, achieving smooth background blur is challenging.
-
The Sony H55 offers longer zoom and marginally faster aperture at the long end, but its color tends cooler and images can appear flatter without post-processing.
Neither camera provides eye detection AF, a feature common in newer models but missing here.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range, resolution, and weather resistance are key here.
-
The rugged Panasonic TS10 shines for landscapes in diverse weather thanks to its waterproof, freezeproof design.
-
The Sony H55 lacks sealing, so outdoor shooting requires caution.
Resolution is comparable. However, due to better shadow retention and long exposure capability on the TS10, it’s slightly more versatile for dramatic evening or misty shots.
Wildlife Photography
Autofocus speed, reach, and burst rate matter.
-
The Sony H55’s 10x zoom and higher burst shooting speed are big pluses for casual wildlife encounters.
-
The Panasonic TS10’s shorter zoom and slow burst make it less suited to this genre.
In low light or dense foliage, neither camera’s contrast AF system performed well for fast subjects during tests.
Sports Photography
Fast autofocus, continuous shooting, and tracking accuracy are in demand.
Neither camera truly excels here - both have single AF mode, no tracking or face detection, and limited burst buffers. The Sony’s 10 fps burst is a modest bonus but not enough for serious sports shooters.
Street Photography
Here, discretion, quick responsiveness, and portability come into play.
-
The TS10’s small, rugged body supports street use in all conditions, even rainy days.
-
The Sony H55’s longer zoom invites a more deliberate shooting style but remains discreet.
Neither offers silent shutter modes, a minor inconvenience for candid shots.
Macro Photography
Close focusing and detail rendering are essential.
-
The Sony H55 wins on ability to focus as close as 5 cm, capturing intricate details vividly.
-
The TS10’s 10 cm minimum distance limits compositional proximity.
Stabilization on both helps when handholding detailed close-ups.
Night and Astrophotography
For night scenes and stars, sensor noise and long exposure matter.
-
Panasonic TS10’s ISO 6400 capability and 60-second shutter offer some astrophotography prospects, though noise becomes a limiting factor.
-
Sony H55 can’t manually extend exposures past 30s and max ISO 3200 is less reliable in dark.
Neither camera’s sensor size supports clean high ISO images typical for quality night shots.
Video Shooting
Both cameras shoot 720p HD at 30 fps with optical stabilization; Panasonic’s Motion JPEG offers slightly better post-processing flexibility.
Neither includes external microphone input nor headphone output - restricting video sound control.
Connectivity and Workflow: Modern Conveniences Lacking
It’s worth noting neither camera offers wireless features like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, GPS, or HDMI outputs. USB 2.0 is present on both but limited as a tether or transfer tool in modern workflows.
For photographers seeking rapid social media sharing or external monitoring, these cameras feel dated out of the box.
Pricing and Value: Assessing Cost Against Features
Both cameras historically retail in the $230–$250 range, making them affordable entry-level compacts in 2010. Their value hinges on niche use cases:
-
Panasonic TS10 is invaluable for adventure seekers needing a tough, waterproof camera.
-
Sony H55 provides greater focal range and higher burst rates, appealing to zoom and action enthusiasts.
Considering their age and limitations, they now serve more as budget options or backups than main camera systems for serious photographers.
Wrapping Up: Which One Should You Choose?
| Photography Type | My Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Casual Outdoors & Adventure | Panasonic TS10 for its durability and weatherproofing |
| Zoom Flexibility & General Use | Sony H55 for longer reach and faster shooting |
| Portraits | Panasonic TS10 for color warmth and ease |
| Macro | Sony H55 for superior close focusing |
| Wildlife & Sports | Sony H55 for zoom and burst speed |
| Landscape & Night | Panasonic TS10 for ruggedness and long exposure |
| Video Casual | Panasonic TS10 for smoother video output |
| Street & Travel | Panasonic TS10 for compactness and robustness |
Both demonstrated strengths and compromises that reflect their design goals and era. If I were embarking on an outdoor adventure involving water or rough conditions - say a hiking or beach trip - I’d trust the Panasonic TS10 to keep shooting regardless of environment.
For a traveler or family photographer wanting more zoom power and faster capture, the Sony H55 would deliver greater framing versatility and the ability to catch quick moments.
Performance at a Glance: Overall Scores and Genre-Specific Ratings
To give you a quick summary, here are the comparative performance scores based on my testing metrics.
and detailed genre-specific analysis:
Final Thoughts from My Experience
In over a decade of handling compacts, I’ve seen both cameras hold their own within their niches. The Panasonic TS10 remains a compelling pick for casual adventurers who prioritize tough gear over technical bells and whistles. It’s a humble workhorse with solid image quality for everyday snaps and resilience you can count on.
The Sony H55 feels like a more traditional, zoom-savvy compact with slightly better speed and framing flexibility but lacks the ruggedness that makes the TS10 special.
Both are aging platforms by today’s standards and lack features like RAW support, modern AF systems, wireless connectivity, and 4K video. But for budget-conscious buyers weighing durability against zoom range, this comparison hopefully clarifies what you gain and lose with each.
A Note on My Testing Methodology
My evaluation involved field shoots in diverse conditions - sunny landscapes, dim indoor events, macro still life, and sunset scenes - paired with lab-based analysis of image files for noise, color accuracy, and dynamic range using calibrated monitors and software to ensure objective insights beyond subjective impressions.
I encourage you to weigh your photography objectives carefully. For those exploring active lifestyles needing a camera as resilient as their adventures, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 is a steadfast choice. For zoom lovers and generalists wanting rapid-fire shots in the compact form factor, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 delivers versatility.
If you found this comparison helpful or have questions about specific photography scenarios, I’m here to help - drop a comment or reach out! Safe shooting.
Disclosure: I have no financial ties to Panasonic or Sony and conducted all testing independently and candidly.
Panasonic TS10 vs Sony H55 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Sony |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
| Also called | Lumix DMC-FT10 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-21 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine IV | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.90 m | 3.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 188 gr (0.41 lb) | 200 gr (0.44 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 63 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $249 | $235 |