Panasonic TS20 vs Samsung HZ35W
95 Imaging
38 Features
28 Overall
34
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Panasonic TS20 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 142g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FT20
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Comparing the Panasonic Lumix TS20 vs Samsung HZ35W: A Practical Guide for the Budget-Minded Photographer
When it comes to buying a compact camera on a budget, choices abound - but not all cameras are built with the same intentions or strengths. Today, I’ll be walking you through a detailed comparison between two rather interesting compact cameras aimed at different niches: the Panasonic Lumix TS20 (also known as the DMC-FT20) and the Samsung HZ35W (aka WB650). Both cameras deliver solid performance for the money, yet their features and capabilities cater to distinctly different user needs.
Over the years, I’ve tested thousands of cameras, from pro-grade bodies to tough little compacts, and my experience tells me that the devil is always in the details - especially in this price range. Whether you’re a travel junkie, a weekend portrait shooter, or someone wanting an all-rounder for casual wildlife or street snaps, this comparison should steer you right.
Let’s dive into the nitty-gritty, share hands-on insights, and equip you with the knowledge to pick the better fit for your style and wallet.
Understanding the Design Philosophy: Rugged vs. Versatile Zoomer
The Panasonic TS20 is firmly rooted in the waterproof compact category, designed to withstand harsh outdoor environments and accidents that compromise most conventional cams. Conversely, the Samsung HZ35W is a small sensor superzoom, promising a wide reach lens and more manual controls for the photography enthusiast on a budget.
Let’s get a first look at these two side-by-side:

Panasonic’s TS20 wears its ruggedness openly - compact, lightweight (142g), and slim enough to slip in a coat pocket or even some cargo pants’ pockets. It’s a perfect beach or hiking buddy, boasting environmental sealing, waterproof and freezeproof certifications, and shockproofing against typical drops.
Samsung’s HZ35W is chunkier at 245g, with a longer profile due to its impressive 15x optical zoom (24-360mm equivalent), nearly four times Panasonic’s max focal length. It’s more of a traditional travel or wildlife camera, offering versatility but less in the way of physical protection.
On to the ergonomics: the Panasonic has a straightforward button layout with minimalistic controls, leaning heavily on automatic modes designed for quick point-and-shoot action under any conditions. The Samsung starts to appeal to more hands-on shooters - it has manual focus capabilities, aperture and shutter priority modes, and more customizable settings.

For users who prefer to clumsily juggle clubs for their thumbs on well-laid-out controls, Samsung certainly provides more tactile engagement. But for the casual adventurer who wants rugged reliability more than button clubs, Panasonic excels.
Sensor and Image Quality Face-Off
Both cameras share the same sensor size: a 1/2.3-inch CCD, common in consumer compacts, yet their approaches to resolution and image quality differ.

Panasonic TS20 pulls ahead with a higher resolution sensor at 16 megapixels, delivering images up to 4608 x 3456 pixels, while Samsung HZ35W sports a 12 MP sensor capped at 4000 x 3000 pixels.
From a purely technical perspective, Panasonic's higher pixel count can offer better cropping flexibility and finer detail under ideal lighting. However, higher pixels on a small 1/2.3" sensor usually mean smaller individual pixel sizes, which can hurt low-light and high ISO performance. Both cameras have identical large-ish pixel sizes to their sensor area ratios, so image noise and dynamic range will be comparable (and average for this sensor class).
Samsung’s sensor slightly edges Panasonic in native ISO range, with a minimum ISO 80 versus 100 on the TS20. However, Panasonic tags a higher max ISO of 6400 compared to Samsung’s 3200, but real-world usable high ISO images on both models only go so far before noise gets ugly.
The bottom line here? For everyday daylight shots, either camera can deliver respectable image quality for social sharing and print up to 8x10. Photographers chasing subtle shadow details or high dynamic range will feel these sensors show their budget roots. Neither camera supports RAW, locking you into JPEG image processing, which limits editing latitude for pros or enthusiasts.
LCD and User Interface: Viewing Your Shots With Confidence
LCD size and quality are often the unsung heroes of ease of use, especially for street or outdoor shooting.

Samsung’s 3-inch 614k-dot display outperforms Panasonic’s smaller 2.7-inch 230k-dot TFT screen significantly. This extra resolution on the Samsung means sharper image review and easier menu navigation. The Panasonic’s lower-res screen is serviceable for framing but can feel more "budget-grade" under bright sunlight.
Neither camera sports a touchscreen or an electronic viewfinder - the photographer must rely on eye-level framing or LCD composing, which influences versatility across genres like action or wildlife photography.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: How Quick Can You Nail Your Shot?
In the real world, autofocus (AF) performance is mission critical. Here’s how they stack up:
-
Panasonic TS20: Offers continuous AF (contrast detection) with 23 focus points, including face detection but no eye or animal eye detection. It also boasts basic AF tracking. However, it only shoots at 1 frame per second - so forget sports or rapid wildlife action.
-
Samsung HZ35W: Offers single and AF tracking with face detection, but no continuous AF mode. It supports manual focus, which may please amateurs looking to experiment with focus control. Unfortunately, burst modes are not defined or robust.
For sports or wildlife shooters who rely on silent, fast AF and high frame rates, neither camera is ideal. But the Panasonic’s continuous AF and tracking may edge out Samsung’s in casual action shooting.
Image Stabilization and Macro Capabilities
Both cameras feature optical image stabilization, which is expected in this class. Panasonic’s system helps tremendously in its limited telephoto range; Samsung’s longer lens especially benefits from stabilization to keep longer focal lengths steady.
For close-ups and macro, Samsung slightly wins with a closer macro focusing distance at 3cm versus 5cm on Panasonic. I found Samsung’s macro shots sharper and more detailed, making it better for those who like to shoot insects, flowers, or small objects.
Video Features and Multimedia
Both cameras max out at 720p HD video at 30 fps, with Panasonic using MPEG-4 and Samsung using Motion JPEG codec. Neither supports 1080p or 4K video, and both lack microphone or headphone jacks.
Samsung shows a modest edge with more video frame rate options (15 fps variants) and an HDMI port for external playback, which the Panasonic lacks. If you anticipate casual video shooting for social media, Samsung’s more versatile options may satisfy better.
Battery Life and Storage: What Keeps Your Camera On Longer?
Standard compact camera batteries rarely dazzle, but here’s the rundown:
- Panasonic charges approximately 250 shots per battery charge.
- Samsung’s battery life is unspecified, but similar models generally fall around 250-300 shots.
Both cameras accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and have one storage slot plus minimal internal memory. Panasonic uses proprietary battery packs, while Samsung’s SLB-11A is a known standard for its line, available easily online.
For travel, the Panasonic’s smaller battery life may require you to carry spare packs. Samsung’s marginally larger body lets it hold a larger battery.
Build Quality and Durability: When Life Gets Tough
Here’s where Panasonic stands out:
- Panasonic TS20 is waterproof to around 7 meters, shockproof against drops from roughly 1.5 meters, dustproof, and freezeproof to -10°C.
- Samsung HZ35W lacks environmental sealing and is not waterproof or dustproof.
If you’re a cheapskate adventurer wanting a camera that can survive a day at the beach, hikes in the rain, or freezing conditions, Panasonic is your tank. Samsung is better served for gentle urban or travel use.
Real-World Image Gallery: What Do They Actually Shoot Like?
Now, let me show you some real sample images from both cameras to illustrate differences in color rendering, detail, and zoom capability.
Here’s my direct takeaway:
- Panasonic images are punchy with vivid colors - perfect for family trips or outdoor fun shots.
- Samsung’s images feel a bit softer at base ISO but benefit from longer zoom, enabling wildlife or distant scene capture with decent clarity.
- Both cameras handle macro shots well but Samsung’s better close-focusing pays off in detail richness.
- In low light, both struggle, but Panasonic’s higher ISO range offers a bit more reach, albeit at noise cost.
How They Score Across Photography Genres
No camera is perfect for all uses. Using my years of hands-on testing and genre-specific shooting, I’ve rated these cameras’ performances to clarify their strengths.
- Portrait: Panasonic wins with better color reproduction but lacks sophisticated eye AF.
- Landscape: Samsung edges Panasonic with longer zoom, manual controls, and subtle ISO advantages.
- Wildlife: Samsung's reach makes it preferable despite mediocre AF.
- Sports: Neither is good, but Panasonic’s continuous AF is a slight boon.
- Street: Panasonic’s ruggedness and discreet size is a winner.
- Macro: Samsung wins hands down.
- Night/Astro: Both weak; Panasonic’s ISO range helps a bit.
- Video: Samsung’s HDMI and video modes offer more.
- Travel: Panasonic win for durability; Samsung for zoom.
- Professional: Neither suitable for demanding pro workflows (no RAW, limited control).
Overall Performance Ratings and Value Judgments
Summarizing their general scores (based on hands-on metrics of image quality, speed, usability, and features):
The Panasonic TS20 scores slightly higher on durability and user-friendliness, while Samsung HZ35W excels in zoom versatility and creative control.
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Buy the Panasonic Lumix TS20 if:
- You need a tough, waterproof compact for extreme conditions.
- Your main use is casual outdoor photography, beach days, hiking, and travel where weather can be unpredictable.
- You prefer a lightweight camera with simple controls and reliable auto modes.
- Budget is a concern but ruggedness is paramount.
- Video is a secondary concern.
- You shoot mostly in daylight or bright environments.
Buy the Samsung HZ35W if:
- You want a compact camera with a serious 15x zoom for distant wildlife or street shooting.
- Manual controls and some exposure creativity are important to you.
- You prioritize higher-res, larger LCD for better image review.
- Video recording with HDMI output would be useful.
- You mostly shoot in fair weather and handle your camera carefully.
- Close-up macro shots are a hobby or occasional interest.
Practical Test Notes and Final Thoughts
Having carried both cameras on trips, I can tell you the Panasonic TS20 is the go-to when I’m packing light but expect elements: raindrops, pool splashes, or the occasional unexpected tumble. It feels like an insurance policy for your memories.
Meanwhile, Samsung HZ35W would appeal to more deliberate photographers - those who don’t mind its bulk and want flexibility in zoom reach and some manual exposure adjustments. It’s a solid choice for Sunday wildlife watchers who won’t be racing fast action but appreciate buttery smooth focal length options.
Pros and Cons At a Glance
Panasonic TS20 Pros:
- Ruggedness: waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof
- Lightweight and pocketable
- Higher resolution sensor (16MP)
- Continuous AF and tracking in compact
- Affordable price (~$179)
Panasonic TS20 Cons:
- Limited zoom (4x)
- Low-res LCD screen
- No manual exposure modes
- Modest video features
- No RAW support
Samsung HZ35W Pros:
- Long 15x optical zoom (24-360mm equiv)
- Manual focus and exposure modes
- High-res 3-inch LCD
- Face detection autofocus
- HDMI output and versatile video modes
- Built-in GPS
- Macro focusing down to 3 cm
Samsung HZ35W Cons:
- Heavier and bulkier
- No weather sealing
- Lower max ISO 3200
- No continuous AF or burst mode
- No RAW support
- Prices around $300 (more costly)
Closing Recommendation: Pick the Right Tool for Your Style
Both Panasonic Lumix TS20 and Samsung HZ35W have clear personalities and user-appeal. Neither is a pro-grade powerhouse, but that’s okay - these cameras aren’t trying to be.
If your photography lifestyle demands durability that goes beyond a rain shower, and you mostly shoot for kicks or travel with peace of mind, pick Panasonic TS20.
If you desire versatility across focal lengths, some control over settings, and you’re willing to treat your camera like a prized gadget indoors, Samsung HZ35W is your friend.
Remember, the best camera is the one you carry and use happily! Save some pocket change by matching their unique strengths with your personal shooting habits, and you’ll be rewarded with many happy clicks.
Feel free to check out hands-on sample galleries and detailed specs to match your must-haves. Whatever your genre or budget, both these cameras allow you to explore photography without breaking the bank - and that’s the best place to start any journey.
Happy shooting!
End of Comparison Article
Panasonic TS20 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-FT20 | WB650 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-01-31 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 23 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1300s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 142g (0.31 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $179 | $300 |