Panasonic TS25 vs Pentax Q10
95 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34


92 Imaging
36 Features
56 Overall
44
Panasonic TS25 vs Pentax Q10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 144g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FT25
(Full Review)

Panasonic Lumix TS25 vs Pentax Q10: A Comprehensive Camera Showdown for Everyday Photography Enthusiasts
When delving into the world of cameras, choices can be daunting. Today, I’m putting two very distinct yet occasionally overlapping cameras under the microscope: the Panasonic Lumix TS25 (also known as Lumix DMC-FT25) and the Pentax Q10. These two capture completely different philosophies in camera design - one is a ruggedized waterproof compact, while the other is an entry-level mirrorless camera boasting interchangeable lenses. Both target casual to enthusiast photographers but serve markedly different shooting scenarios. After spending a significant amount of time thoroughly testing these cameras side by side, my goal in this review is to help you decide which one fits your photographic needs best.
Setting the Stage: Design, Build, and Ergonomics
A camera’s physicality shapes much of the user experience - from how you hold it to how seamlessly you can adjust settings on the fly. The Panasonic TS25 is a rugged, compact point-and-shoot built for adventure. Its shockproof, dustproof, freezeproof, and waterproof construction - rated for underwater use - makes it a trusty travel or lifestyle companion when durability matters most. Weighing just 144 grams and measuring a slender 104mm x 58mm x 20mm, it’s easy to slip into a jacket pocket or a small bag. Ergonomically, its fixed lens and minimal controls underscore simplicity and robustness rather than customization.
By contrast, the Pentax Q10 exudes a retro-modern rangefinder charm, with a more substantial grip and body heft (200 grams, 102mm x 58mm x 34mm). It’s not built to survive a tumble in muddy streams, but it offers a far more traditional and versatile approach with interchangeable lenses and manual controls. The layout favors photographers who want more granular command - including dedicated exposure modes, manual focus, and exposure compensation. Though slightly larger, it’s still highly portable for a mirrorless system.
The top view comparison reveals a stark difference: the TS25 leans on straightforward point-and-shoot simplicity with a modest button array, while the Q10 offers more dials, buttons, and an overall “camera” feel. For users who prize rugged portability, the Panasonic wins out. For those craving more tactile control - the Pentax feels familiar and rewarding over extended shooting sessions.
Image Sensor and Quality: A Close Look at What Lies Beneath
A critical factor in image quality (IQ) is the sensor technology and size. Both cameras share a surprisingly similar sensor size, approximately 1/2.3-inch, which is common in compacts but tiny by mirrorless or DSLR standards. However, the Panasonic uses a CCD sensor, whereas the Pentax relies on a CMOS sensor.
CCD sensors, like in the TS25, traditionally excel in color rendition and noise control at lower ISOs but tend to have slower readout speeds and drain batteries faster. CMOS, used in the Q10, offers faster sensor readouts, better dynamic range, and superior noise performance at high ISOs. The Pentax’s sensor also supports raw file capture - a must-have feature for professional post-processing flexibility - while the Panasonic does not.
The Pentax Q10’s 12-megapixel sensor, despite fewer pixels compared to the TS25’s 16-megapixel count, generally delivers cleaner images with better dynamic range. This was evident especially in challenging lighting situations during testing - highlights were preserved more naturally on the Q10, with less clipping and smoother gradation in shadows.
The TS25’s higher resolution is somewhat undermined by its compression and noisier output above ISO 400. That said, the Panasonic can still produce usable images for casual use and web sharing.
Seeing It All: Display and Viewfinder Capabilities
Neither camera sports an electronic viewfinder, but their rear LCD screens differ meaningfully in size and resolution, affecting usability in bright or detailed shooting situations.
- Panasonic TS25: 2.7-inch fixed TFT LCD, 230k-dot resolution
- Pentax Q10: 3.0-inch fixed TFT color LCD, 460k-dot resolution
The Q10’s larger, sharper display offers a more detailed preview, helpful when composing critical shots or evaluating focus accuracy. The Panasonic screen, while adequate for casual framing, struggles in bright sunlight and doesn’t provide much detail for checking focus or exposure.
Neither camera has a touchscreen - a limitation in the current market - but both support live view. The Q10’s non-touch interface is supplemented by customizable buttons and dials, easing navigation through menus and settings.
Autofocus Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
When assessing autofocus (AF), I examined speed, accuracy, face detection, and continuous tracking in real-world scenarios.
- Panasonic TS25: 23 focus points, contrast-detect AF only, no face or eye detection. Limited AF customization.
- Pentax Q10: 25 AF points, contrast-detect AF with face detection.
The TS25 is adequate for casual snaps - AF locking is decent in good light but noticeably slower and prone to hunting in low light or complex scenes. No face-detection makes portrait work less reliable.
The Q10’s face detection function adds a level of precision, especially when shooting portraits or group shots. Continuous AF tracking sustains sharp focus even with moderate movement, making it more versatile for events or street photography. That said, neither camera supports phase-detect AF or hybrid systems, so AF performance won’t rival more modern mirrorless or DSLR cameras, especially under low contrast conditions.
Lens Versatility and Optical Performance
A fundamental divergence between these cameras is their lens capabilities.
- Panasonic TS25: Fixed 25-100mm equivalent zoom lens with a variable aperture of f/3.9–5.7.
- Pentax Q10: Interchangeable Pentax Q mount lenses - 8 lenses available ranging from ultra-wide to telephoto, including macro and fisheye options.
The fixed lens on the TS25 offers convenience and waterproof sealing but limits creative flexibility. Its modest zoom range is appropriate for snapshots, but the slower aperture means limited low light performance and less impressive bokeh for portraits.
The Q10’s interchangeable lens system is the big selling point for enthusiasts. With fast primes and zooms available up to 300mm equiv., it adapts well to varied genres like portraits, landscapes, macro, and even wildlife (at a modest level). The aperture range is broader, supporting f/1.9 lenses for beautiful subject isolation and usable low-light shooting.
Shooting in Various Disciplines: Practical Performance Insights
Let’s explore how each camera fares across common photographic categories, based on hands-on testing:
Portrait Photography
For pleasing skin tones and bokeh, the Pentax Q10 clearly shines. Its larger sensor, lens options, and face detection combine to produce flattering, softly blurred backgrounds and sharp eye focus - essentials in portraiture. The Panasonic TS25, while capable of casual portraits, falls short on background separation due to lens aperture and limited AF capabilities. Lack of eye detection also hampers precision.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters benefit most from resolution, dynamic range, and weather sealing. Surprisingly, the Panasonic TS25’s rugged construction is an advantage outdoors in harsh environments - snow, rain, and dust pose no threat. However, limited sensor dynamic range and lower resolution reduce image quality.
The Q10 offers better tonal gradation and detail, but without weather sealing, it demands more care in the field. Its wider variety of lenses also helps capture ultra-wide vistas and telephoto landscapes.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Neither camera is designed primarily for wildlife or fast action sports. The Q10’s 5 fps burst shooting and better AF tracking offer an edge over the TS25’s very slow 1 fps continuous shooting. Telephoto lenses for the Q10 also enable closer framing. The Panasonic’s slower AF and limited zoom range restrict its use here.
Street Photography
For candid shooting in urban environments, portability and discretion matter. The TS25’s compact, rugged form makes it easy to carry but commands attention with its bright plastic body. The Q10 is slightly bulkier but more versatile and less toy-like in appearance, with silent shutter options (though limited).
Low-light capabilities via the Q10’s better sensor give it an advantage when capturing night scenes or dim cafés.
Macro and Close-Up
The TS25 features a 5cm macro focus range, nice for casual blister-level close-ups. The Q10, paired with dedicated macro lenses, offers superior magnification, focusing precision, and image quality.
Night and Astro Photography
The Panasonic struggles here - limited ISO range, noisier sensor, and no raw support. The Pentax Q10, with raw files and better ISO handling (albeit modest due to sensor size), can capture cleaner night scenes, though it still can’t match larger sensor cameras for astrophotography.
Video Capabilities
Panasonic provides 720p video at 30fps in MPEG-4 format with basic optical image stabilization. This is acceptable for casual vloggers but lacks sharpness and resolution for serious video work.
The Pentax Q10 shoots full HD 1080p video at 30fps in MPEG-4 or H.264, with access to manual exposure control during recording. HDMI out is available for external monitoring, a plus for content creators. However, neither camera has external mic input or advanced video features like 4K recording or in-body stabilization beyond sensor shift (which benefits stills more).
Durability and Weather Resistance: Which Is Ready For Adventure?
This is where the Panasonic TS25 truly dominates. Its ruggedized, waterproof, dustproof, and freezeproof build enables it to endure environments out of reach for the Q10. Snowy mountains, sandy beaches, and underwater use - the TS25 is specifically designed not to flinch.
The Pentax Q10 offers no significant environmental sealing - a crucial factor when planning to shoot in harsh or unpredictable weather. While you can mitigate risk with protective gear, it's less straightforward and often more costly.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
Both cameras use proprietary rechargeable battery packs with similar life expectancy - about 250 to 270 shots per charge. Not outstanding by today’s standards but adequate for casual day trips.
Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC memory cards but only have single card slots. Despite the Q10's higher price, neither offers dual-slot redundancy coveted by professionals.
Connectivity is minimal on both - neither offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS integration. Pentax’s inclusion of HDMI out on the Q10, however, gives videographers an edge.
Pricing, Value, and Who Should Buy Which?
At the time of this review, the Panasonic Lumix TS25 retails around $180, while the Pentax Q10 is priced at roughly $350. While the Q10 commands nearly double, it packs more advanced features, sensor quality, and lens ecosystem support.
If you prioritize ruggedness, pocket-friendly size, and simple operation for outdoor fun and waterproof reliability, the Panasonic TS25 is a compelling bargain. On the other hand, if creative control, image quality, and growth potential through lenses are more important - especially for portraits, landscapes, or low-light work - the Pentax Q10 justifies its premium.
Final Thoughts From Extensive Testing
To wrap up:
-
The Panasonic Lumix TS25 is an excellent entry-level waterproof compact. It thrives in the role of an everyday adventure camera, sacrificing advanced functionality for durability and ease of use. I frequently found it useful during hikes or beach trips where risk of damage was high.
-
The Pentax Q10 is a niche-rangefinder style mirrorless camera that punches above its sensor size with lens variety, manual controls, and video capability. It suits enthusiasts looking for a portable creative toolkit rather than an all-weather companion.
While neither camera replaces a professional-grade mirrorless or DSLR, both deliver good value given their price points and intended uses. Every serious buyer should ask: What do I prioritize - durability and pocketability, or image quality and creative versatility? The answer will guide your choice between these two distinctly unique tools.
Summary Table: Key Specs at a Glance
Feature | Panasonic Lumix TS25 | Pentax Q10 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | 1/2.3” CCD | 1/2.3” CMOS |
Megapixels | 16 MP | 12 MP |
Lens | Fixed 25-100mm (f3.9-5.7) | Interchangeable Pentax Q |
Autofocus | Contrast-detect, 23 pts | Contrast-detect, 25 pts + face detection |
Max Shutter Speed | 1/1300 sec | 1/8000 sec |
Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | 5 fps |
Video | 720p @ 30fps, MPEG-4 | 1080p @30fps, H.264/MPEG-4 |
LCD Screen | 2.7", 230k-dot TFT LCD | 3.0", 460k-dot TFT LCD |
Weight | 144 g | 200 g |
Environmental Resistance | Waterproof, shockproof | None |
Battery Life | ~250 shots | ~270 shots |
Price Range | ~$180 | ~$350 |
In my years of hands-on testing thousands of cameras, I’ve found that understanding your shooting style and environment will always steer you toward the right camera - not just specs on paper. The Panasonic TS25 and Pentax Q10 both occupy fascinating corners of camera design, serving complementary needs rather than competing directly.
So, which one will it be for you? For rugged fun and carefree shooting - Lumix TS25. For creative control in a compact mirrorless body - Pentax Q10. Either way, you’re stepping into a capable photographic journey.
For future camera explorations, stay tuned as I’ll continue to provide in-depth, real-world reviews to guide enthusiasts through rapidly evolving tech and features.
Panasonic TS25 vs Pentax Q10 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 | Pentax Q10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 | Pentax Q10 |
Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-FT25 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2012-09-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 23 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 8 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1300s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | 7.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Trailing-curtain sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 144 grams (0.32 lbs) | 200 grams (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 183 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 pictures | 270 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $180 | $350 |