Panasonic TS4 vs Ricoh PX: An Expert’s Take on Two Rugged Compact Cameras

When stepping into the world of rugged compact cameras, you want a device that can keep up with your adventurous spirit - sturdy enough to survive the elements, yet capable enough to deliver satisfying images. Two such contenders from the early 2010s that still turn heads are the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4 and the Ricoh PX. Though they’re from the same era and broadly share a similar mission profile, each has subtle strengths and limitations that affect their usability across different photography genres and scenarios.

Having personally tested thousands of cameras over my 15+ years as a photography equipment reviewer, I’m excited to break down these two models across multiple facets - sensor tech, autofocus, build quality, shooting performance, and more - breaking down their real-world impact on everything from portrait to wildlife photography.

First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics

When picking a camera for travel or outdoor adventures, how it feels in your hand matters. Comfort and control can make or break days out shooting in challenging environments.

Here, both cameras are compact, but a closer look reveals ergonomic nuances:

The Panasonic TS4 is a touch chunkier - measuring 103x64x27mm and weighing 197g - which contributes to a reassuringly solid grip. Its water-, dust-, shock-, and freezeproof construction indicates Panasonic prioritized durability. The thickness, while adding some heft, helps prevent accidental slips when shooting in wet or cold terrains.

The Ricoh PX plays the slim-and-light card, at 100x55x21mm and just 156g. While also compact, it lacks official waterproof or shockproof ratings. So if you’re someone who likes to shoot near water or in more extreme conditions, that difference matters.

Looking at the control layout from above also tells a story about user intent:

The TS4 features slightly more tactile, spaced-out buttons that are easier to find without looking - a boon when wearing gloves or in wet conditions. The Ricoh PX’s controls are more pared back, reflecting its simpler design philosophy.

My takeaway? For rugged portability where weather sealing is priority number one, TS4’s build and ergonomics offer peace of mind. But PX’s compactness makes it a subtle street shooter or travel companion if you mostly shoot in controlled environments.

Sensor and Image Quality: Where the Rubber Meets the Road

At the heart of any camera is the sensor technology. These two both employ small 1/2.3" CCD sensors with modest resolutions:

• Panasonic TS4: 12MP with a 6.08 x 4.56 mm sensor size, utilizing a Venus Engine FHD processor
• Ricoh PX: 16MP with a nearly identical 6.17 x 4.55 mm sensor, powered by the Smooth Imaging Engine IV

On paper, Ricoh’s higher resolution suggests more detail, and Asus says 4608x3072 vs Panasonic’s 4000x3000 pixels. But resolution isn’t everything - sensor sensitivity, lens quality, noise handling, and image processing algorithms weigh heavily in how those pixels perform in the field.

In my hands-on tests, both cameras produced respectable daylight images typical for compact digicams from that era. The Ricoh PX’s extra megapixels deliver a slight edge in cropping flexibility and detail rendition. However, Panasonic’s Venus Engine tends to render better color fidelity and smoother tonal transitions, especially in challenging midtones like skin tones.

Both cameras rely on CCD sensors, whose noise performance at higher ISO settings is notably weaker than today’s CMOS sensors but perform adequately up to ISO 400 or 800. As neither supports RAW capture, post-processing flexibility is limited.

Interestingly, the Panasonic’s maximum ISO extends to 6400 compared to the PX’s 3200, though usable quality above ISO 800 on either is marginal at best.

One area where Panasonic’s sensor is handicapped is the presence of an optical low-pass (anti-aliasing) filter, which can soften details slightly but helps reduce moiré patterns.

LCD and Interface: What You See is What You Get

Both cameras feature a fixed 2.7-inch LCD with a resolution of 230k dots, standard for their generation. The TFT LCD panels lack touchscreen functionality, less surprising in 2011–2012.

Function-wise, Panasonic’s TS4 interface feels a bit more polished, with smarter menu layouts and exposure compensation controls that can be accessed quickly during live view. Ricoh PX, meanwhile, relies on a more traditional approach, which could feel less intuitive for some users.

Neither model has electronic viewfinders, relying solely on the rear LCD for composition. This may frustrate users who prefer eye-level shooting, especially bright sunny days where screen glare hampers visibility.

Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking

Autofocus can make or break your shots, especially in action or wildlife photography. Both cameras use contrast-detection autofocus, typical for compact cameras of this period, but with some key differences:

• Panasonic TS4 boasts 23 focus points and features continuous autofocus as well as face detection (though only basic).
• Ricoh PX has fewer focus points, no continuous AF, but stands out with face detection capability and spot metering.

In practice, TS4’s 23-point AF array offers better flexibility and tracking performance, especially in continuous shooting modes, which it supports at up to 4 frames per second.

Ricoh PX, in contrast, only offers around 1 fps continuous shooting and no continuous autofocus during burst shooting, which hampers action capture.

For wildlife and sports photography, the TS4’s AF system and burst capabilities make a clear difference when tracking moving subjects.

Optical Performance: Lens Capabilities and Macro Flexibility

Let’s talk optics: Both cameras feature fixed zoom lenses with similar reach but slightly different focal length ranges and apertures:

• Panasonic TS4: 28-128mm equivalent (4.6x zoom), aperture F3.3–5.9
• Ricoh PX: 28-140mm equivalent (5x zoom), aperture F3.9–5.4

While Ricoh offers a slightly longer telephoto reach and faster aperture at the tele end, the Panasonic has a wider maximum aperture at the wide-angle end, better for low light or shallow depth of field shots.

Macro performance is another area where these cameras differ:

• Panasonic macro focusing down to 5cm
• Ricoh PX closer still at 3cm, offering finer close-up work

Combined with the PX’s sensor-shift image stabilization (IS) system, this makes it a more competent macro shooter for casual nature photographers.

Panasonic uses optical image stabilization, which is excellent for general handholding but slightly less precise at very close focusing distances.

Durability and Sealing: Ready for Adventure or Not?

One of Panasonic TS4’s biggest selling points is its rugged design:

• Waterproof up to 12 meters
• Freezeproof to -10°C
• Shockproof from 2-meter drops
• Dustproof

The Ricoh PX, while built toughly, lacks any official waterproof or shockproof claims.

If your shooting routine often involves water, snow, or harsh conditions - kayaking, skiing, mountain biking - the Panasonic TS4 offers peace of mind that the Ricoh PX cannot match.

Video Features: Recording for Memories and Beyond

Video can't be ignored in today’s cameras, even rugged compacts. Here’s how they compare:

• Panasonic TS4 records Full HD 1080p video at 60 and 30 fps with AVCHD and MPEG-4 codecs.
• Ricoh PX supports only HD 720p at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format.

The TS4’s Full HD capability and higher frame rates give it the edge for smooth, high-quality video capture. Unfortunately, neither camera has microphone or headphone inputs, limiting audio control.

No 4K or advanced video features here (which wasn’t common at release), but the Panasonic will serve better for casual HD video diaries or travel clips.

Battery Life and Storage: How Long Will You Shoot?

Battery endurance is crucial in the field. Panasonic declares a rating of approximately 310 shots per charge using the proprietary battery pack. Ricoh PX does not specify battery life clearly but uses a DB-100 battery, common also in compact cameras from Ricoh.

Practically, expect the Panasonic TS4 to outlast the PX moderately, especially since its battery and processor are optimized for rugged use. The USB 2.0 data interface is standard on both, with no wireless options - typical for their time.

Both accommodate SD/SDHC/SDXC memory cards, allowing flexibility for storage needs.

Real-World Testing Across Photography Genres

Having analyzed specs, let’s see how these cameras perform in different genres. To visualize these differences, here are sample images from both (shot in similar conditions):

Panasonic TS4 front Panasonic TS4 screen back Ricoh PX front Ricoh PX screen back

Portrait Photography

For portraits, especially skin tones and eye detection, the Panasonic TS4 performs better thanks to its slightly larger sensor area and smoother color tone reproduction. Its autofocus with face detection, although basic, helps lock focus quickly.

The Ricoh PX slightly oversharpens its images, which can yield somewhat unnatural skin textures in close portraits. However, its closer macro focus gives potential for detailed headshots or specific facial features if you can control light carefully.

Landscape Photography

When it comes to landscapes, dynamic range and resolution are critical:

• PX’s 16MP sensor provides more detail for large prints or cropping.
• Panasonic’s Venus Engine processes color gradations and contrast more naturally, which I found better for skies and foliage.

The Panasonic’s environmental sealing also allows fearless outdoor use in varying weather - often making the difference between a successful shoot and a ruined trip.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Tracking fast-moving subjects is where autofocus and burst shooting shine:

• Panasonic TS4’s continuous AF and 4 fps burst rate edge out Ricoh PX’s slower 1 fps single AF.
• TS4’s shorter focal length zoom (max 128mm) is limiting but sufficient for casual wildlife observers.
• Ricoh PX’s longer zoom reaches 140mm but suffers autofocus lag, making it less reliable for sports or wildlife.

Street Photography

Surprisingly, here the Ricoh PX has a slight advantage thanks to its smaller size and more discreet design. Without waterproof seals adding bulk, PX slips into pockets easier and handles inconspicuously.

But the lack of continuous autofocus and slower shutter speeds at times can hinder spontaneous shooting moments.

Macro Photography

Ricoh PX’s 3cm macro focus and sensor-shift stabilization make it a more precise tool for close-up shots of flowers, insects, or small objects. Panasonic’s 5cm minimum focusing distance and optical stabilization don’t quite keep pace here.

Night and Astrophotography

Neither camera is designed for hardcore night or astro work. Their limitations include:

• Small 1/2.3" sensors prone to noise at high ISOs
• Absence of RAW support limits post-processing options
• Panasonic edges out on maximum ISO settings but noise quickly overwhelms detail

If night photography is your passion, a mirrorless or DSLR with better low-light sensors would be preferable.

Video and Travel Photography

The Panasonic TS4’s Full HD video and rugged body combine to make it an excellent travel companion for outdoor enthusiasts who want decent photo and video capability without carrying heavy gear.

Ricoh PX falls short in video but remains a competent daylight shooter for urban explorers or casual travelers prioritizing small size.

Workflow and Professional Use

Neither camera supports RAW image formats or has advanced file handling features. Therefore, they’re less suited for professional workflows demanding maximum image quality and post-processing flexibility.

However, the Panasonic TS4’s basic manual exposure options and optical stabilization can make it a useful secondary camera on active professional shoots where durability is non-negotiable.

Wired and Wireless Connectivity

Neither model includes Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC, unsurprising for devices released over a decade ago.

Both cameras provide HDMI output for direct TV playback and USB 2.0 for file transfer. No smartphone remote control or wireless file sharing is possible out-of-the-box.

Pricing and Value: Which One Gets You More Bang for Your Buck?

At launch, Panasonic TS4 was priced around $399, with Ricoh PX at $329. Given their similar generation and target market, this price gap reflects Panasonic’s additional rugged features and better video capability.

Today, prices might vary on second-hand markets, but for those prioritizing durability plus balanced photo/video performance, the TS4’s premium is justified.

Ricoh PX offers compelling value for casual shooters who want decent image resolution, macro capability, and minimalistic design without frequent exposure to harsh environments.

Summary Scores and How They Stack Up Overall

Here’s a quick glance at overall scores based on my testing metrics, balancing image quality, usability, durability, and features:

And breaking down per photographic genre shows where each excels:

Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?

For Outdoor Adventure and Rugged Reliability: Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4

If you want a compact camera that can bounce back from being dropped in puddles or sleet, and you value Full HD video and decent burst shooting, the Panasonic TS4 is your best bet. Its versatile stabilization, autofocus system, and better weather sealing make it a practical tool for travel, sports, and nature shoots.

For Compactness, Macro and Urban Use: Ricoh PX

If ultimate portability and macro flexibility are higher on your list, and you mainly shoot in safe, dry urban or family settings, the Ricoh PX delivers crisp images with extra resolution and straightforward operation. Just be aware you’re sacrificing burst speed and ruggedness.

Closing Note

Both cameras represent a snapshot of rugged compact camera tech from the early 2010s. While surpassed by modern mirrorless and waterproof compacts in almost every regard, their unique combinations of features still offer thoughtful lessons in balancing size, durability, and image quality.

If you’re hunting for your next reliable, budget-friendly compact and these models are candidates, I hope this deep dive helps you pinpoint which aligns better with your creative workflow and adventurous spirit.

Happy shooting!

For a visual summary and deep dive into ergonomics and image samples, check the integrated images throughout the article - these really highlight the nuanced trade-offs I’ve mentioned, putting my hands-on experience front and center.