Panasonic ZR1 vs Ricoh WG-M1
94 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27


91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Panasonic ZR1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-ZX1
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014

Panasonic ZR1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets look closer at the Panasonic ZR1 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Panasonic and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the ZR1 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The ZR1 was introduced 6 years prior to the WG-M1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the ZR1 scores versus the WG-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Panasonic ZR1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic ZR1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Ricoh WG-M1
ZR1 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Panasonic ZR1
WG-M1 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 62 months |
Common features in the Panasonic ZR1 and Ricoh WG-M1
ZR1 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Panasonic ZR1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Panasonic ZR1 offers outer dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic ZR1 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the ZR1 versus the WG-M1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ZR1 and WG-M1 is 94 and 91 respectively.

Panasonic ZR1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ZR1 and WG-M1.
As you can tell, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to give more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged ZR1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Panasonic ZR1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic ZR1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-ZX1 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2014-09-12 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | (1×) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 1.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.10 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $280 | $2,000 |