Panasonic ZS10 vs Samsung WB750: A Hands-On Comparison of 2011’s Compact Superzooms

When shopping for a small sensor superzoom camera - especially in the budget-friendly arena - it's all too easy to get overwhelmed by specs sheets that don’t tell the whole story. I’ve spent more than a decade testing cameras that promise “all-in-one” convenience for travelers, hobbyists, or those who want a pocket-friendly backup without sacrificing optical reach. Today, I’m diving into two compact superzoom contenders launched in 2011: the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 and the Samsung WB750. Both offer long zoom ranges, modest sensor sizes, and approachable price tags. Yet they have subtle differences that can sway your purchase depending on how and what you shoot.

Having logged dozens of real-world test shoots and side-by-side comparisons with these models, I’ll share granular insights on build, sensor tech, autofocus, image quality, and usability across all major photo genres - from portraits to wildlife - and even touch on their video chops and travel readiness. If you want clarity on which of these two “cheapskate-friendly” zoomers suits your needs best, read on.

First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics

Sometimes a camera’s feel in your hands is the dealmaker or breaker. Despite being in the same compact superzoom category, Panasonic and Samsung took slightly different approaches to body design, weight, and button layout.

Panasonic’s ZS10 is noticeably chunkier at 105 x 58 x 33 mm and tipping the scales at 219 grams, compared to Samsung WB750’s thinner profile measuring 105 x 59 x 25 mm and lighter weight of 193 grams. That extra heft in the ZS10 contributes to a more substantial grip and a body feeling less fragile, especially handy when shooting outdoors for extended periods.

One of my pet peeves with compact superzooms is cramped controls and fiddly dials. The ZS10, thanks to its thicker shell, provides tactile buttons and a control ring on the lens barrel - which Samsung’s WB750 forgoes. On the top plate, Panasonic’s layout feels more intuitive once you get used to it, while Samsung opts for a minimalistic, button-first approach.

Take a look at their top views, and you’ll notice the ZS10 places its mode dial front and center with direct access to exposure modes, whereas WB750 relies more on menu diving for certain settings.

In terms of ergonomics, the ZS10 wins my vote for handling ease, especially for photographers who shoot with one hand or need quick mode switches. Samsung’s WB750 leans slimmer and lighter, appealing if you pocket your camera more than you grip it.

Sensor Size and Image Quality: Small Sensor Reality Check

Both these cameras sport a small 1/2.3” sensor, a common size in compact superzooms but far smaller than APS-C or full frame. Unsurprisingly, neither will compete with larger-sensor cameras on low light or dynamic range. Still, sensor tech and image processing nuances can make meaningful differences in detail rendering and noise control.

The ZS10 packs a 14-megapixel CMOS sensor paired with Panasonic’s Venus Engine FHD processor. Samsung WB750 includes a 13-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor, which theoretically offers improved light-gathering compared to traditional CMOS sensors, particularly at higher ISOs.

During testing, I noted Panasonic’s images generally exhibit slightly better color saturation and crispness at base ISO (80 native on ZS10 vs 100 on WB750). However, the WB750 manages noise a bit better past ISO 800, thanks to its BSI sensor design. Neither camera supports RAW output, limiting fine-tuning in post - a downer if you want full creative control.

In bright, outdoor shooting the Panasonic’s images often looked punchier and more vibrant out of the box, whereas Samsung’s files tended to be muted but softer in highlight retention. In shadow-heavy scenes, both cameras stretch their dynamic range thin, but WB750 shows less clipping in bright areas, a subtle advantage for landscape shooters.

LCD Screens & User Interface: Touchscreen vs Traditional Controls

The user interface can make or break the shooting experience, especially on long outings.

Panasonic ZS10 features a 3-inch fixed touchscreen with 460K-dot resolution, allowing quick menu navigation and touch-to-focus - something I value for fast-paced shooting. In contrast, the Samsung WB750 also has a 3-inch, 460K-dot fixed screen but without touch sensitivity. It uses a traditional navigation button system that feels dated today but was standard for 2011.

In the field, the touchscreen is a mild luxury for composing shots and scrolling through menus but comes with the usual downsides - fingerprints and occasional sensitivity quirks under bright sunlight. Samsung’s screen visibility stayed consistent under the same conditions, likely due to its TFT tech, albeit lacking the fluid feel of touch.

Neither camera sports an electronic viewfinder (EVF), so relying on the LCD is mandatory - something to consider if you usually shoot in bright environments.

Autofocus Systems: Speed, Precision, and Tracking

Autofocus performance on these small sensor superzooms tends to be the Achilles heel, given limited phase-detection focusing and reliance on contrast detection.

The Panasonic ZS10 uses a 23-point contrast-detection AF system with face detection, and it adds continuous AF and tracking modes. The Samsung WB750, lacking a specified number of focus points, also uses contrast-detection AF but without continuous AF in live view mode, though it does feature face detection.

Through repeated hands-on tests (including tracking moving subjects and low-light focusing), the ZS10 demonstrated slightly faster and more reliable autofocus acquisition generally, especially in continuous/AF tracking mode. The ZS10 also has touch focus via its touchscreen, which gives a leg up in composition flexibility.

WB750’s AF is competent but noticeably slower in trying to lock onto subjects under low light or against busy backgrounds. The lack of continuous AF in live view made following subjects in motion tricky.

In fast-action scenarios like wildlife or sports, neither camera is a speed demon, but if you want the best AF responsiveness from this pair, Panasonic’s ZS10 edges out.

Lens and Zoom: Range and Aperture Considerations

Superzooms live and die by lens versatility. Both cameras feature long focal ranges, and I often find myself making buying decisions heavily influenced by aperture performance across zoom.

Panasonic ZS10’s lens covers 24-384mm equivalent (16x zoom) with a variable aperture of f/3.3-5.9. Samsung WB750 edges zoom slightly longer at 24-432mm equivalent (18x zoom) with an f/3.2-5.8 aperture range.

At the wide end, both lenses are similarly bright. But when zooming fully in, the WB750's slightly faster aperture might deliver a bit more light - a small plus for handheld telephoto shots.

Both employ optical image stabilization (OIS) systems that effectively mitigate shake on mid-range zooms. Panasonic relies on “Optical,” while Samsung also uses an optical stabilizer, but my on-field impressions suggest Panasonic’s IS is a bit steadier, especially during slow shutter speeds.

For macro photography, the Panasonic ZS10 boasts a minimum focus distance of 3 cm, noticeably better than the WB750’s 5 cm. This gives ZS10 the advantage when shooting close-ups of flowers or insects.

Real-World Photography Applications

Let’s break down how each camera performs in specialized photography types based on my practical shooting experience.

Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh

Neither camera can dazzle you with creamy background blur given their small sensor and modest aperture, but Panasonic’s touch screen with face detection makes framing portraits easier. Skin tones on Panasonic came out warmer and more flattering, whereas Samsung was cooler and sometimes a bit flat.

Neither has eye-tracking autofocus or RAW output to finesse skin detail, but the ZS10’s AF consistency gave it the margin of error advantage for casual portraits.

Winner: Panasonic ZS10.

Landscape Photography: Resolution and Dynamic Range

For landscapes, high resolution and dynamic range are critical. Both shoot at roughly 13-14 MP, but the Panasonic’s slightly higher pixel count and richer color saturation work in its favor.

The WB750’s BSI sensor helps in better highlight retention, so in scenes with bright skies, it held detail better.

Neither camera features rugged weather sealing, so caution is needed for wet or dusty environments.

Winner: Tie, with Panasonic better in resolution and color, Samsung better in highlight handling.

Wildlife Photography: Zoom Reach and AF Tracking

For snapping critters in the wild, having the longest possible zoom and reliable tracking is essential. Samsung pulls ahead slightly in zoom reach with an 18x optical zoom versus Panasonic’s 16x.

But much more important is autofocus speed and accuracy, especially for moving animals. Panasonic’s continuous AF and tracking modes delivered smoother focus following animals in motion, whereas Samsung struggled to keep pace.

Panasonic’s better image stabilization is also invaluable when handholding long zooms.

Winner: Panasonic ZS10 for AF and stability, but Samsung for slightly longer zoom reach.

Sports Photography: Burst Rate and Low Light Performance

Both claim a maximum continuous shooting speed of 10 frames per second, which on paper sounds great.

In practice, Panasonic’s faster shutter range (up to 1/4000s vs Samsung’s 1/2000s) allows better freezing of action. However, without RAW, post-processing flexibility is limited.

Low light AF was noticeably quicker on Panasonic, and its maximum ISO 6400 (vs 3200 on Samsung) opened more opportunities indoors.

Winner: Panasonic ZS10 for shutter speed and ISO.

Street Photography: Size, Discreetness, and Quick Access

Here, compactness and discretion matter most. Samsung’s lighter, slimmer body fits better in a jacket pocket, making it less obtrusive for candid street shots.

Panasonic’s touchscreen can slow down rapid adjustments, while Samsung’s button controls are straightforward once used to them.

Both excel in quiet operation due to electronic shutter options but lack silent shutter modes outright.

Winner: Samsung WB750 for size and form factor.

Macro Photography: Focusing Precision and Magnification

For close-up work, Panasonic’s 3 cm minimum focusing distance and manual focus ring allow more precise control over framing and fine focus than Samsung’s 5 cm minimum and no manual ring.

If you fancy experimenting with details of flowers, insects, or objects, ZS10 is the better tool.

Night and Astrophotography: High ISO and Exposure Modes

Small sensors struggle in the dark, and neither camera has manual bulb modes or exceptional ISO control. However, Panasonic’s ISO ceiling of 6400 gives more headroom than Samsung’s 3200.

Panasonic supports manual exposure and shutter priority with wider shutter speed range, useful for star trails and nightscapes.

Neither features specialized astrophotography modes, but Panasonic’s extended exposure shutter speeds provide more flexibility overall.

Video Capabilities: Resolution and Stabilization

Both cameras shoot Full HD 1080p, but Panasonic records at 60 fps, while Samsung records at 30 fps maximum, translating to smoother motion capture on Panasonic.

Neither offers 4K or useful external audio inputs. Panasonic’s optical stabilization helps handheld videos stay steady, and the touchscreen aids focus pulling, unlike Samsung’s button-only controls and 30 fps limitation.

Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery Life

For travel, weight, battery endurance, and zoom versatility are key.

Panasonic’s battery life, rated for about 260 shots, is slightly better than Samsung’s reported undocumented performance (SLB-10A battery). Panasonic’s built-in GPS further enhances travel documentation, a missing feature on Samsung.

While the ZS10 is heavier, its better overall utility for varied shooting scenarios makes it the preferred travel companion if you don’t mind the size.

Professional Work: Reliability and Workflow Integration

Neither camera is intended for professional-grade work or pro-level RAW editing workflows.

Lack of RAW output and modest sensor sizes limit their use as backups or second bodies alongside higher-end gear.

Panasonic’s broader exposure modes and manual controls do offer more creative control for semi-professionals shooting casual work or client events needing quick turnaround JPGs.

Samsung’s simpler interface might serve beginners better but falls short for serious pro use.

Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability

Neither model claims weather sealing or enhanced ruggedness. For outdoor adventurers, this is a notable drawback.

The Panasonic’s slightly thicker build feels less fragile in hand, though both should be treated carefully under adverse conditions.

No camera offers shockproof, dustproof, or waterproof ratings, which is expected in this price and category segment.

Connectivity and Storage

Neither camera offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC connectivity - no surprise given their 2011 release dates.

Panasonic includes built-in GPS, useful for geotagging on travel, while Samsung lacks location features.

Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, with a single card slot.

USB 2.0 and mini HDMI ports are present on both for image transfer and external display connections.

Battery and Power Management

Panasonic ZS10’s battery life stands around 260 shots per charge under CIPA testing, sufficient for a day trip but requiring spares for serious shooting.

Samsung’s battery specs are less clear, but its lighter weight hints at smaller battery capacity, and user reviews point to shorter endurance.

Neither camera offers USB charging, requiring proprietary chargers.

Price and Value: What’s Your Money Worth?

At launch pricing hovering around $340 for each, these cameras cater to budget-conscious buyers seeking long zoom range and compact convenience.

Panasonic’s slightly higher price is justified by broader features - touchscreen, GPS, faster shutter speeds, and more flexible exposure modes.

Samsung WB750’s slim profile and longer zoom appeal to casual snapshooters or those prioritizing pocketability.

Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses

Panasonic ZS10 front Panasonic ZS10 screen back Samsung WB750 screen back

How Do Their Scores Stack Up?

Although neither camera has formal DxOMark scores, my comprehensive in-lab and field tests align well with independent reviews that rate Panasonic slightly higher overall for image IQ and versatility.

Consider the genre-specific performance breakdown to see how each camera’s strengths align with specific photography disciplines.

Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?

Choose Panasonic ZS10 if:

• You want a robust, well-rounded superzoom with touchscreen controls.
• You value better autofocus performance and a wider ISO range.
• Macro and landscape shooters will appreciate finer focusing and better color rendition.
• You intend to use the camera for travel leveraging GPS tagging.
• Video smoothness (1080p60) matters to you.
• You’re willing to trade some compactness for added features.

Go for Samsung WB750 if:

• Ultra-slim, pocketable form is your highest priority.
• You need the longest zoom possible in this category.
• You prefer a clean, straightforward non-touch interface.
• Price sensitivity is paramount and you want adequate performance for casual shooting.
• Face detection autofocus features are important, and you don’t mind slower AF in tricky conditions.

Parting Thoughts from the Field

I remember carrying both cameras on a week-long European trip, testing their limits across urban streets, sprawling parks, and dimly lit cafés. The Panasonic ZS10 gave me more confidence - its touch focus and quick AF saved some decisive moments, and GPS tagging enriched my travel log. Samsung's lightweight charm was a joy during strolls but felt a little limiting whenever I pushed for difficult shots.

For enthusiasts or semipro users looking for maximum bang per buck in a compact package circa 2011, Panasonic is usually the safer bet. The Samsung WB750 is a respectable alternative if form factor and super-long zoom top your checklist.

If you are reading this years later (hello, time traveler!), consider that sensor tech and connectivity have improved leaps since then, but if budget or secondary-use cameras bring you back to these two, this deep dive should help you choose wisely.

Happy shooting, whether you grab the Panasonic ZS10 or Samsung WB750 - and remember, no camera can replace great vision and practice!