Panasonic ZS35 vs Pentax E90
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
94 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Panasonic ZS35 vs Pentax E90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Released January 2014
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS40
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-95mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 145g - 102 x 59 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2010
Panasonic ZS35 vs Pentax E90 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Panasonic ZS35 vs Pentax E90, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Panasonic and Pentax. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the ZS35 (16MP) and E90 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe ZS35 was released 4 years after the E90 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the ZS35 matches up vs the E90 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Pentax E90 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 & Pentax Optio E90. The complete galleries are provided at Panasonic ZS35 Gallery & Pentax E90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Pentax E90
ZS35 | E90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | January 2010 | Newer by 49 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax E90 over the Panasonic ZS35
E90 | ZS35 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic ZS35 and Pentax E90
ZS35 | E90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Panasonic ZS35 vs Pentax E90 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Panasonic ZS35 provides outside measurements of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Pentax E90 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic ZS35 vs Pentax E90 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the ZS35 versus the E90.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the ZS35 and E90 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Pentax E90 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching specifications. The image below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the ZS35 and E90.
To sum up, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Panasonic ZS35 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent ZS35 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Panasonic ZS35 vs Pentax E90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS35 vs Pentax E90 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Pentax Optio E90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | Pentax Optio E90 |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-TZ55 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-01-06 | 2010-01-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Prime |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 21 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 32-95mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 6cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 305g (0.67 lb) | 145g (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 102 x 59 x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $300 | $100 |