Panasonic ZS40 vs Sony H400: The Ultimate Small Sensor Superzoom Showdown for 2024

When it comes to small sensor superzoom cameras, finding the right balance between portability, zoom reach, image quality, and overall usability can feel like a daunting task. Today, I’m diving deep into two compelling models that have earned attention from serious enthusiasts and casual shooters alike - the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 (also known as the Lumix TZ60) and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. Both pack substantial zoom power in relatively affordable packages, but each brings unique strengths and compromises to the table.

After extensive hands-on testing across a variety of shooting conditions and photography genres, this comprehensive comparison aims to demystify which camera suits your needs best - whether you’re a wildlife photographer chasing distant subjects, a traveler needing versatility, or a casual photographer craving simplicity.

Getting Acquainted: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics

Before diving into the nitty-gritty, let’s start by getting a physical feel of these cameras. Both models harbor hefty zoom capabilities in compact-ish bodies, but their form factors differ significantly.

The Panasonic ZS40 is noticeably smaller and lighter, weighing just 240g with a trim profile of 111x64x34mm. The design screams pocket-friendly, making it an excellent travel companion that won’t weigh you down during long excursions.

In contrast, the Sony H400 tips the scales at a hefty 628g - over 2.5 times heavier - with an SLR-style bridge body of 130x95x122mm. This size increase accommodates its massive 63.3x zoom lens (25-1550mm equivalent), but the tradeoff is a bulkier, less discreet presence. Anyone wanting to shoot street scenes or slip their camera in a jacket pocket may find this unwieldy.

Ergonomically, I found the Panasonic’s more compact form easier to grip securely for longer periods, while the Sony’s larger handgrip and more pronounced lens barrel afford better balance when fully zoomed in. Your shooting style and portability preferences will likely drive the decision here - which is the lesser compromise for you?

Design and Control Layout: Navigating the User Interface

Beyond size, the practical interface - buttons, dials, displays - makes a massive difference for in-the-field experience.

The Panasonic ZS40 features a straightforward control setup with intuitive dials and customizable buttons. Its Venus Engine processor drives responsive menu navigation and quick access to key shooting modes such as aperture priority and manual exposure, useful for users wishing to step beyond full auto without overwhelming complexity.

Sony’s H400 presents a more traditional bridge camera top layout, with more dedicated dials and switches befitting experienced shooters who appreciate granular tactile control over parameters. However, its menu navigation felt a bit sluggish during testing, partly due to its older processor and less refined firmware UI.

Neither camera offers touchscreen control, which is a drawback for those used to modern interfaces - but the Panasonic’s superior screen resolution makes menu reading and focus point selection smoother overall.

Sensor and Image Quality: Small Sensor, Big Expectations?

Both the ZS40 and H400 use the ubiquitous 1/2.3" sensor size - a typical choice for superzoom compact cameras - but Sony pushes its sensor resolution a step further to 20MP CCD, whereas Panasonic opts for an 18MP CMOS sensor.

This difference is far from trivial. CMOS sensors tend to excel at noise control and dynamic range, largely due to on-chip improvements and more advanced image processing capabilities. The ZS40's Venus Engine complements its CMOS sensor well, producing richer colors, better highlight retention, and less noise at ISO 800 and above.

Sony’s CCD sensor theoretically offers sharper, more detailed images at base ISO but struggles with noise and dynamic range under challenging lighting. Its maximum ISO tops out at 3200, but usable ISO rarely extends beyond 400 in practical use.

Both cameras include an anti-aliasing filter to reduce moiré artifacts, but this mildly softens fine detail - a reasonable tradeoff in this segment.

In testing landscape and daylight portrait scenarios, Panasonic’s CMOS sensor consistently delivered cleaner images with balanced tones, especially critical when preserving natural skin tones. The Sony’s sensor, while capable of decent daylight captures, showed pronounced color shifts in shade and artificial light.

Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Keeping Up With Fast Action

Speed and accuracy in autofocus can make or break candid, wildlife, or sports photography.

The Panasonic ZS40 uses a contrast-detection autofocus system with 23 focus points and face detection capabilities. It supports continuous autofocus and tracking, allowing it to follow moving subjects fairly reliably in moderate light conditions. Burst rate clocks in at a respectable 10 frames per second, which is quite competitive.

The Sony H400, unfortunately, has a slower single-shot autofocus system - limited to contrast detection and disabling continuous autofocusing during burst shots. It offers only 1 fps in continuous shooting, which makes it cumbersome for action sequences or wildlife that require rapid capture.

From experience, the Panasonic autofocus is noticeably quicker to lock and track subjects, especially humans, aided by its face detection algorithm. The Sony tends to hunt noticeably longer before settling focus, which can lead to missed shot opportunities.

LCD Screen and Viewfinder: Framing the Moment

Framing your shot comfortably is essential, especially when shooting long telephoto or in bright daylight.

Panasonic’s ZS40 is outfitted with a 3-inch TFT LCD boasting 920k dots, which gave me crisp, colorful previews and intuitive menu overlays. Its fixed screen lacked touch capabilities and articulation but was bright enough for most outdoor scenarios.

Sony’s H400 offers a similar 3-inch Clear Photo LCD but with a much lower 460k resolution, making it harder to check focus and details conveniently on the rear screen.

Both cameras include an electronic viewfinder (EVF) with ~200k dot resolution. While functional, these EVFs appear small and somewhat grainy, limiting their usefulness for critical manual focusing. That said, the Sony’s bigger body lends itself better to eye-level EVF use, whereas the Panasonic views it more as a supplementary framing aid.

Lens Performance: How Much Zoom Power is Too Much?

The headline feature of any superzoom camera is, of course, its focal length reach.

Panasonic ZS40’s lens covers 24-720mm equivalent (30x zoom) with a modest maximum aperture range of f/3.3 to f/6.4. The optics are sharpest at wide-angle to moderate telephoto distances, but image quality declines visibly at full 720mm zoom due to lens diffraction and inherent compromises of supertele lenses.

Sony H400 pushes boundaries with an enormous 25-1550mm equivalent (63.3x zoom) lens, the longest zoom on a consumer camera at its release. Maximum aperture ranges from f/3.4 to f/6.5.

While impressive on paper, the Sony’s extreme zoom resulted in more noticeable softness, chromatic aberration, and distortion towards the long end. Its optics are best utilized under controlled, steady conditions preferably with a tripod, which somewhat limits spontaneity.

For wildlife or birders, Sony’s reach is a clear advantage - but at the expense of sharpness and portability. For travel and everyday shooting, Panasonic’s more modest zoom strikes a better balance.

Video Capabilities: Beyond Still Photography

Neither camera is designed as a serious video workhorse but let's explore their capabilities.

Panasonic ZS40 records Full HD 1080p video at 60fps or 30fps using AVCHD and MPEG-4 formats. Its optical image stabilization helps smooth handheld footage, and the presence of a built-in microphone accommodates basic audio recording. However, it lacks microphone or headphone jacks, limiting advanced audio control. I found the autofocus during video smoother and quieter compared to Sony.

Sony H400 captures video only at 720p resolution, max 30fps, recorded in MPEG-4 H.264 format. This is quite low by today’s standards and reduces usability for vloggers or occasional video creators wanting crisp footage.

Sony does include an external microphone port, which is a rare plus in this class and beneficial for better sound - but the low resolution and lack of 1080p make it a tough recommendation for video-first users.

Battery Life and Storage: Staying Power on the Go

Both cameras use proprietary rechargeable battery packs with similar rated lifespans of approximately 300 shots per charge per CIPA standards.

In my real-world testing, battery endurance closely matched manufacturer claims. For extended travel shoots, packing a spare battery is advisable for either camera.

Storage-wise, Panasonic supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, while Sony is slightly more versatile, accepting Sony Memory Stick PRO Duo alongside SD cards. Both only have a single card slot.

Neither model includes USB-C; instead, they rely on USB 2.0 for transfer, limiting file import speeds.

Connectivity and Extras: Staying Modern or Left Behind?

In connectivity, Panasonic ZS40 offers built-in wireless with Wi-Fi and NFC, allowing for easy image transfer and remote shooting - a significant convenience for social media sharing or quick backup.

Sony H400 has no wireless connectivity at all, relying solely on wired USB and HDMI connections. This lack feels outdated in 2024 and restricts flexibility, especially for casual shooters accustomed to smartphone sharing.

Panasonic includes built-in GPS for geotagging, a boon for travelers and landscape photographers for organizing photos by location.

Build Quality and Durability: How Tough Are These Cameras?

Neither camera touts environmental sealing or rugged build features. Both should be treated as delicate electronics with care around moisture, dust, or shocks.

Panasonic’s smaller, plastic-rich construction feels solid for its class but lacks any weatherproofing.

Sony’s larger bridge form factor conveys more robustness through heft, but no ruggedization features exist either.

Real-World Photography: Performance Across Genres

Having dissected the specs and tested core systems, how do these cameras fare across major photography genres?

Panasonic ZS40 front Panasonic ZS40 screen back Sony H400 front Sony H400 screen back

Portrait Photography

Skin tones benefit from Panasonic’s CMOS sensor and subtle color tuning, offering pleasing, natural results without oversaturation. Its faster autofocus and face detection made capturing sharp portraits easier.

Sony’s images tended to appear a bit flat and colorless, especially indoors, owing to the CCD sensor and inferior low-light capabilities. The autofocus was slower, impacting capture timing.

Bokeh quality is understandably modest on both given lens aperture restrictions, but Panasonic’s optics produced subtly smoother backgrounds.

Landscape Photography

Panasonic – better dynamic range preserved highlights and shadows, helping capture dramatic landscapes without washed-out skies or crushed shadows.

Sony’s higher megapixel count allowed for larger prints but revealed increased noise and reduced tonal gradation.

Neither lens excels in corner sharpness at extreme zoom, but Panasonic’s shorter zoom range shows better optical control overall.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Sony’s colossal 1550mm zoom is unbeatable for distant wildlife but requires a tripod to mitigate softness and camera shake.

Panasonic’s quicker burst rate (10fps) and superior autofocus tracking make it more viable for fast-moving subjects in sports and wildlife - if you can sacrifice zoom length.

Street and Travel Photography

Panasonic’s pocketable size, superior autofocus, and wireless features make it an ideal street/travel camera. Discreet handling helps capture candid moments.

Sony’s bulk and slower AF deter quick street shooting but appeal to those needing immense zoom - an unusual niche.

Macro Photography

Panasonic offers a close focusing distance of 3 cm, lending decent macro utility for flower and small subject photography.

Sony lacks macro specs, with minimal near-focusing ability, limiting this genre.

Night and Astro Photography

Both cameras’ small sensors and max ISO limits curtail night shooting quality.

Panasonic fares better at high ISO with less noise, but long exposures still reveal grain and detail loss.

Sony’s lack of a bulb mode and slower lenses hinder astro work.

Video and Vlogging

Panasonic’s 1080p/60 FPS video, stabilizer, and wireless control give it a slight edge for casual video users.

Sony’s only 720p video and slower autofocus make it a niche device for video.

Price and Value: Which One Delivers More Bang for Your Buck?

Currently, Panasonic ZS40 retails near $450, while Sony H400 is closer to $270. The Sony’s larger zoom, while alluring, carries significant compromises in handling, image quality, and speed.

The Panasonic's blend of compactness, responsive autofocus, better sensor, and modern features justifies the higher price for users valuing image quality and usability.

Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown

Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which Camera?

Panasonic Lumix ZS40
Ideal for photography enthusiasts and travelers who demand versatility, portability, and image quality. It excels in portraits, landscapes, street photography, and casual wildlife spots. The CMOS sensor delivers better overall image quality, and its fast autofocus system suits action fairly well. If you want modern connectivity and an all-around shooter that won’t bog you down, this is my strong recommendation.

Sony Cyber-shot H400
Appeals primarily to those needing an extreme telephoto zoom on a tight budget - bird watchers or wildlife hobbyists desiring reach beyond typical superzooms. However, this comes at the cost of bulk, slower autofocus, and limited video capability. Not recommended for fast action or critical image quality needs but a unique, affordable option where max zoom is king.

In Conclusion

Neither camera is a do-it-all champion - small sensor superzooms inherently involve compromises. Yet, after thoroughly vetting both models across multiple scenarios, I can confidently recommend the Panasonic ZS40 for generalist photography where usability and balanced performance matter most, and the Sony H400 when zoom length trumps all else.

I hope this deep dive helps you make an informed choice matching your photographic ambitions and budget.

Happy shooting!

If you want to explore hands-on reviews or view sample galleries, both manufacturers have extensive online resources. Also, check current refurbished or used market deals - sometimes these gems appear at bargain prices.

All test results are based on hours of real-world shooting and standardized lab evaluations to ensure we provide trustworthy, first-hand insights.

End of Article