Panasonic ZS60 vs Sony RX10 IV
88 Imaging
43 Features
63 Overall
51


52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Panasonic ZS60 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 282g - 112 x 64 x 38mm
- Announced January 2016
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ80
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS50
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS70
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Revealed September 2017
- Superseded the Sony RX10 III

Panasonic ZS60 vs Sony RX10 IV: A Real-World Superzoom Showdown
Two compact superzoom cameras from giants of the industry, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV, entered my lab and field tests with a promise of versatility - but deliver widely different levels of performance, handling, and image quality. I’ve spent weeks shooting with both cameras in diverse scenarios, from sunlit city streets to moonlit landscapes and wildlife-filled safaris. Beyond specs, this comparison digs into the nitty-gritty of how each camera behaves when the rubber meets the road. Let's unpack what sets these two apart and where each shines.
Compact Versatility Meets Bridge Camera Bulk: Handling and Ergonomics
Starting from the topline, the Panasonic ZS60 is a compact, pocketable superzoom with a classic point-and-shoot silhouette - it measures 112x64x38mm and weighs a feather-like 282g. In contrast, the RX10 IV is a much more substantial system, weighing almost 1.1kg and sized like a DSLR with dimensions roughly 133x94x145mm. This makes ZS60 a natural travel companion for casual shooters or enthusiasts who prize portability, while the Sony targets photographers who demand a robust bridge camera experience without swapping lenses.
The Panasonic sports a fixed 3-inch touchscreen that’s responsive but non-articulated - limiting low or high angle framing. The Sony ups the ante with a 3-inch tilting touchscreen and a highly detailed electronic viewfinder (EVF) offering 2359k dots and a 0.7x magnification. This EVF significantly improves composition flexibility and eye comfort, especially in bright conditions.
Control-wise, Sony packs more physical buttons and dials - essential for quick adjustments in the field. The RX10 IV’s analog feel includes a dedicated aperture ring on the lens barrel, a feature absent on the ZS60, which relies heavily on touch-based menus for in-depth controls. For photographers accustomed to tactile feedback and rapid menu-driven shooting, Sony’s ergonomics feel decidedly pro-grade. Panasonic’s approach caters better to casual or travel shooting where simplicity and quick point-and-shoot usability take priority.
Sensor Size, Image Quality, and Processor Power: The Foundation of Photographs
Arguably the most significant divide lies in the sensor technology. The ZS60 employs a typical 1/2.3” 18MP CMOS sensor measuring 6.17x4.55mm (28.07mm² area), known for compact size but with inherent limitations in low-light performance, dynamic range, and noise control. By contrast, Sony RX10 IV harnesses a much larger 1” BSI-CMOS sensor with 20MP resolution (13.2x8.8mm; 116.16mm²) - four times the sensor area of Panasonic’s offering.
That sensor size advantage translates into measurable image quality benefits. While the ZS60’s sensor peaks at ISO 3200 (extended to 6400), it struggles to maintain clean images beyond ISO 800 in real-world shots. The RX10 IV's native ISO range stretches far higher with usable results near ISO 6400 and even ISO 12,800 for specific needs. Additionally, Sony’s back-illuminated sensor design maximizes light gathering in tight shadows, while its Bionz X processor handles noise reduction and detail retention far better than Panasonic’s Venus Engine.
Dynamic range - a crucial metric for landscape and HDR photography - is also wider on the RX10 IV, capable of recovering more shadow and highlight detail in challenging lighting. Panasonic’s sensor provides acceptable but modest results, suitable for casual use but falls short for critical post-processing.
Autofocus and Burst Performance: How Fast and Accurate Is Your Shot?
Stepping into the autofocus arena, this is where the RX10 IV asserts real dominance. Sony’s hybrid AF system with 315 focus points, including phase detection and contrast detection AF, offers blistering autofocus acquisition and tracking speeds. The camera can lock onto faces, eyes, and even animal eyes with remarkable precision thanks to advanced AI-driven eye AF. This makes the RX10 IV an excellent tool for sports, wildlife, and fast-paced shooting scenarios.
Panasonic’s ZS60 uses a contrast-detection-only system with 49 focus points and face detection. While reasonably reliable for still subjects and gentle panning, its AF speed and tracking accuracy lag noticeably, especially with moving subjects or low-contrast scenes. The continuous shooting maxes at 10 fps on Panasonic, versus an astonishing 24 fps burst shooting on Sony - enabling photographers to freeze peak action moments effortlessly.
This speed advantage, coupled with Sony’s superior AF, allows professionals and serious hobbyists to confidently capture wildlife on the wing or courtside sports action, a realm where the ZS60 is simply outclassed.
Lens Capabilities and Zoom Reach: Range vs. Aperture Balance
Both cameras come with built-in zoom lenses but differ in focal lengths and optical qualities.
-
Panasonic ZS60: Lens zooms from 24-720mm (30x) equivalent with an aperture range of f/3.3 to f/6.4. The impressive superzoom extends reach but sacrifices aperture width at the telephoto end, leading to slower shutter speeds and increased noise in low-light distant shots.
-
Sony RX10 IV: 24-600mm zoom (25x) with a faster variable aperture range of f/2.4-4.0. The brighter aperture particularly benefits portraits and wildlife shots, enabling better background separation and subject isolation.
The Panasonic’s longer zoom reach is tempting for casual travelers wanting versatile framing without zoom swapping. However, the RX10 IV strikes a finely tuned balance between zoom and aperture speed, which drastically improves usability in many real-world shooting situations.
This lens advantage expands the RX10 IV’s flexibility - from tighter portraits with creamy bokeh to reach-demanding wildlife photography - while Panasonic remains a capable companion only when the subject demands extreme telephoto but light conditions cooperate.
Display Systems and Viewfinder Experience: Composing Your Shot
Display quality and viewfinder usability play a crucial role in framing and reviewing shots, especially outdoors.
The Panasonic ZS60 houses a 3” fixed touchscreen with 1040k dots. The screen responds well to touch inputs for AF, menus, and quick image review. However, lacking articulation limits ergonomic flexibility - shooting at awkward angles requires clumsy repositioning.
Sony’s 3” tilting touchscreen appears sharper at 1440k dots and offers greater flexibility, tilting upward and downward to facilitate creative angles, be it overhead crowds or waist-level street shooting. The RX10 IV also features a high-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2,359k dots and nearly 100% frame coverage, crucial for fast action or bright outdoor shooting where LCD glare can impair composition.
The ZS60 adds a smaller electronic viewfinder with 1,166k dots but it's comparatively modest and tight in detail and magnification. Situations demanding concentrated framing or shooting under bright sunlight clearly favor the Sony offering.
Low-Light and Night Performance: ISO, Stabilization, and Noise
For night or astrophotography enthusiasts, sensor performance and stabilization play a pivotal role.
The Sony RX10 IV’s combination of a larger 1” sensor, higher max native ISO (up to 12,800), and superior electronic shutter speeds, up to 1/32,000s, allow crisp handheld shots or ultra-fast shutter captures without motion blur. Optical image stabilization further reduces shake across focal lengths, complementing low-light ability.
Panasonic’s ZS60, limited by its smaller sensor area and maximum ISO, is less adept at high-ISO shooting. Its optical stabilization works well but can’t compensate adequately in dim conditions where noise and exposure become limiting factors beyond ISO 800.
Both cameras offer manual exposure modes and slow shutter options, but the Sony stands out for night photography with sharper details, better dynamic range, and cleaner images in handheld astrophotography or street-lit scenes.
Video Capture and Multimedia Features: 4K and Beyond
Video capabilities represent another gap between these models.
The Panasonic ZS60 supports 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) at 30p, 1080p at up to 60fps, and offers 4K photo mode, harnessing its 30fps 4K burst to extract still frames from video. It shoots in MPEG-4 and AVCHD formats but lacks microphone or headphone jacks, limiting serious audio recording options.
Sony’s RX10 IV also records 4K UHD at 30p with larger sensor benefits for better video quality. Crucially, it supports advanced XAVC S codec, offers microphone and headphone ports for professional-grade audio control, and provides slow-motion capture at up to 960fps in lower resolutions for creative effects. While Sony lacks 4K photo mode, its autofocus during video is smooth and accurate, making it a solid hybrid tool for photographers who record frequently.
Wireless connectivity on both cameras is built-in, with Panasonic offering Wi-Fi and Sony adding Bluetooth and NFC - facilitating faster, more reliable wireless transfer and remote control options.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity: Staying Power On the Road
Panasonic packs a 320-shot battery life rating for the ZS60, which is decent for its class but requires carrying a spare for extended trips. Sony boosts endurance to approximately 400 shots per charge, benefiting from a larger battery, but the RX10 IV’s more power-hungry features (sensor size, EVF, continuous burst) demand it.
Both cameras take a single memory card slot with SD/SDHC/SDXC compatibility. The Sony additionally supports Memory Stick formats, useful for legacy Sony users.
Connectivity ports show Sony’s professional tilt - adding microphone and headphone jacks, full-sized HDMI, and USB 2.0, while Panasonic includes USB and HDMI but lacks external audio inputs.
Durability and Weather Sealing: Shooting Beyond the Comfort Zone
The RX10 IV is built with professional reliability in mind, featuring weather sealing to protect against dust and moisture - ideal for outdoor enthusiasts and wildlife photographers exposed to rugged conditions.
In contrast, Panasonic’s ZS60 lacks weather sealing and rugged build. While its compactness makes it easy to carry everywhere, cautious handling is advised in harsh environments.
Application-Based Performance and Use Case Recommendations
Portrait Photography
The RX10 IV’s larger 1” sensor and faster aperture range deliver superior skin tone rendition, natural bokeh, and subject isolation compared to the ZS60. Its advanced eye AF system, including animal eye detection, ensures tack-sharp portraits even at telephoto focal lengths. The Panasonic’s smaller sensor and slower aperture make it a fallback when simplicity rules or budgets are tight.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range and resolution place the RX10 IV ahead for detailed landscapes and recoverable shadows. Weather sealing and tilting screen enable comfortable outdoor shooting in various conditions. Panasonic is suitable for casual landscapes but may need post-processing compromise due to sensor limitations.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Sony shines with its rapid 24 fps burst rate, advanced autofocus with subject tracking, and long, fast zoom. The ZS60’s slower burst and AF make capturing fast-moving subjects a challenge. Also, Sony’s rugged build affords confidence in challenging terrains.
Street Photography
Panasonic’s compact profile discreetly fits street scenes and travel setups, offering brightness and framing ease without drawing attention. Sony’s size and weight hamper stealth but provide creative control and image quality for unpaid, intense street reportage.
Macro Photography
Both cameras offer 3 cm minimum focus distances. Sony’s larger sensor aids in depth of field control and detail resolution, while Panasonic’s superzoom macro can handle casual close-ups without fuss.
Night and Astrophotography
Sony’s sensor size, high ISO capacity, and optical stabilization play into clear shots of the night sky with ease, surpassing the ZS60’s noise limitations and restricted ISO.
Video Work
The RX10 IV supports richer codecs, manual audio control, and high frame rates for slow motion, making it a better choice for hybrid shooters. Panasonic is fine for casual 4K clips or family videos but lacks professional video features.
Travel and Everyday Shooting
Panasonic’s ZS60 is the lightweight, pocket-friendly companion you throw in a bag without a second thought. Excellent for vacations or everyday grabs, though at the expense of image quality when conditions demand.
Sony caters to photographers willing to carry a heavier rig for better versatility, control, and quality in diverse shooting scenarios.
Professional Use and Workflow
Sony’s robust file options, larger sensor, and external audio ports cater to professional workflows. Panasonic is more consumer-focused, great for casual RAW shooters but less suited for demanding assignments.
Price and Value Proposition: What You Get for Your Money
At roughly $250, the Panasonic ZS60 represents budget-friendly superzoom convenience with 4K video and touchscreen ease. This is a significant value for beginners or travelers wanting one camera, all-purpose functionality, and minimal investment.
The Sony RX10 IV commands a $1700+ price, reflecting its advanced sensor, pro features, weather sealing, and fast AF system. It offers exceptional performance, though for less casual shooters or professionals needing superzoom and flexibility without carrying multiple lenses.
How They Stack Numerically
Panasonic scores moderately well on compact superzoom scales, especially for image stabilization and zoom reach, but lags on sensor quality and burst performance.
Sony excels across nearly every metric - speed, autofocus, image quality, video, and durability - pushing the envelope of what a fixed-lens superzoom can achieve.
Conclusion: Choosing Your Superzoom
In my experience spanning thousands of cameras, the choice between the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 and Sony RX10 IV boils down to priorities.
-
If lightweight travel, budget, and superzoom reach with decent image quality are your main drivers, the ZS60 ticks those boxes nicely. Its pocketability and 4K video make it a reliable, affordable companion for everyday and travel shoots.
-
If you require professional-grade image quality, blazing autofocus, robust build, and versatile video features - and are ready to invest and carry the extra bulk - the RX10 IV is in a class of its own as a bridge camera with a large sensor and pro aspiration.
Each camera serves well-defined niches, and knowing what you value most will point you clearly. Both are accomplished superzoom machines, but testing reveals one is a refined professional tool; the other a clever, compact shooter optimized for convenience.
I encourage every reader to weigh these attributes against their workflow, shooting style, and budget to make a confident, informed choice.
Happy shooting, and may your next frame be your best yet!
Panasonic ZS60 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-TZ80 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-01-05 | 2017-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,166k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 282 grams (0.62 lbs) | 1095 grams (2.41 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 37 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 19.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.6 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 109 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 400 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $248 | $1,698 |