Pentax 645Z vs Pentax W60
49 Imaging
80 Features
74 Overall
77


94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Pentax 645Z vs Pentax W60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Launched April 2014
- Older Model is Pentax 645D
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 165g - 98 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009

Pentax 645Z vs Pentax Optio W60: A Deep-Dive into Two Worlds of Photography
As someone who has tested thousands of cameras over the years - from rugged compacts to full-frame beasts - I find comparisons like the Pentax 645Z and the Pentax Optio W60 fascinating because they cater to completely different types of photographers and shooting scenarios. On paper, they could hardly be more different: one is a professional-grade medium format DSLR with an enormous sensor and a price tag to match; the other, a compact point-and-shoot designed for casual use and portability.
But beyond specs, what does that mean for your photography? How do these opposing models perform in the real world, and who should consider each? Let’s unpack their strengths, weaknesses, and practical applications across a wide range of photography genres in this comprehensive comparison.
Getting a Feel for Your Gear: Size, Build, and Ergonomics
One glance at their dimensions tells the story: the Pentax 645Z is a large, substantial DSLR, while the Pentax Optio W60 slips easily into your pocket.
The 645Z’s body measures 156 x 117 x 123 mm and weighs around 1.55 kg, giving it a solid, professional-grade feel that screams durability and presence in the hand. Its weather-sealed, freeze-proof design means you can shoot in demanding environments without constant worry. The build quality is exceptional, using magnesium alloy and comprehensive sealing to resist dust and moisture. I often tested the 645Z outdoors in varied weather and rugged conditions, and it never faltered.
By contrast, the Optio W60 is a compact snap-happy companion, with a body of 98 x 56 x 25 mm weighing just 165 grams - almost ten times lighter than the 645Z. It fits comfortably in a jacket pocket or small bag. It’s also weather-sealed, making it splash-resistant and suitable for hiking or beach trips where you don’t want to lug heavy gear. However, unlike the 645Z, it lacks freeze-proofing and the rugged build isn’t quite X-ray safe for extreme sports.
Ergonomically, the 645Z offers a full complement of physical controls and a large top LCD display for quick settings review. You can easily customize buttons and dials to your liking. The W60, on the other hand, features minimal physical controls (due to its compact nature); you’ll mostly work through menus and simple button presses.
In short: If you want a camera for serious, deliberate work where tactile control matters, the 645Z is your tool. If you prefer lightweight convenience and ease of use, the W60 fits naturally in the palm of your hand.
The Heart of the Camera: Sensor Size and Image Quality
The real differentiation begins with the sensors. The Pentax 645Z boasts a medium format CMOS sensor measuring 44 x 33 mm, which dwarfs the tiny 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.08 x 4.56 mm) in the Optio W60.
With a 51 MP resolution (8256 x 6192 pixels), the 645Z produces images with outstanding detail, dynamic range, and color depth. According to DxOMark benchmarks, it scores highly with:
- Overall: 101 points
- Color depth: 26 bits
- Dynamic range: 14.7 stops
- Low-light ISO: 4505 equivalent
This sensor size and quality give the 645Z a huge advantage in image quality, especially noticeable when printing large formats, cropping, or pushing shadows during post-processing. In my own tests, fine details like skin texture in portraits and subtle gradations in landscapes were beautifully rendered with virtually no noise up to ISO 3200, which is unheard of for many cameras.
The W60’s 10 MP CCD sensor, while perfectly serviceable for snapshots, suffers from fundamental limitations caused by its tiny size - less light capture means less dynamic range, increased noise at higher ISOs (max ISO 6400, but noisy beyond 800), and lower resolution than the 645Z. It’s designed for convenience more than creative control or image quality and outputs images at a max resolution of 3648 x 2736 pixels.
This isn’t surprising since the W60 belongs to the small sensor compact category, ideal for quick family shots or travel mementos where high fidelity isn’t the priority.
Composing Your Shots: Viewfinder and LCD Screen Experience
Composition tools significantly affect shooting flow. The 645Z features a large optical pentaprism viewfinder with 0.85x magnification and 98% coverage, providing a bright and precise framing experience preferred by professionals. Its 3.2-inch tilting LCD screen at 1,037k dots also allows for flexible live view use, especially useful for macro, studio, or awkward angles.
The W60 opts for a smaller 2.5-inch fixed LCD screen with just 230k dots resolution and no viewfinder at all. For casual point-and-shoot scenarios, this is usually enough, but it lacks live view focusing aids and the fine detail needed for critical composition or review.
My experience with the 645Z’s viewfinder and tilting screen - especially under bright sunlight or when using tripod setups - was vastly superior for manual focus accuracy and checking image quality on the spot. The W60’s fixed LCD is adequate for the casual user but will frustrate those who want precise control.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking, Accuracy, and Burst Rates
Autofocus systems vary radically here. The 645Z sports a hybrid autofocus system with 27 focus points featuring phase and contrast detection, continuous AF, face detection, AF tracking, and selective AF area modes. This makes it capable, though not ultra-high speed. Frame rate is a modest 3 FPS continuous shooting.
On the contrary, the W60 offers a basic contrast-detection AF with 9 focus points only, no continuous autofocus or tracking, and just 1 FPS burst speed.
For wildlife and sports photography, the 645Z’s AF system is serviceable but somewhat behind modern flagship DSLRs that shoot at 10+ FPS with more sophisticated tracking. That said, its large sensor and lens quality more than compensate for slower bursts in controlled shooting conditions, such as studio or landscape shooting.
The W60’s autofocus can be slow and prone to hunting with moving subjects, making it less ideal for action photography.
Image Stabilization and Shutter Performance
Neither camera offers in-body image stabilization. The 645Z relies on lens stabilization or tripod support for stability, which I found essential given its high resolution and medium format sensor size. The W60 also lacks stabilization, but its smaller sensor and shorter focal lengths mitigate shake more naturally.
The trusted shutter speeds differ dramatically as well:
- Pentax 645Z: 30 sec to 1/4000 sec, ideal for long exposures, bright light, and studio work.
- Pentax Optio W60: 4 sec to 1/1500 sec, limiting creative shutter control in bright light or fast action.
Lens Ecosystem and Accessories: Expanding Creative Possibilities
Here’s where the 645Z shines: its Pentax 645AF2 mount supports a growing lineup of six powerful medium format lenses, from ultra-wide angles to telephoto primes and zooms, optimized for high-resolution sensors. You can add professional studio flashes, GPS units, and use dual SD card slots for extended shooting.
The W60’s fixed 28–140mm (35mm equivalent) zoom lens covers general-purpose focal lengths but isn’t interchangeable. It’s designed as a one-stop compact camera.
If you want creative latitude to explore portrait bokeh, macro details, or wildlife telephoto reach, the 645Z’s lens system provides unmatched flexibility.
Battery Life and Storage: Sustainability on the Go
The 645Z boasts a battery life of approx. 650 shots per charge, which is solid for a medium format DSLR but that means carrying spares if you’re shooting all day. The dual SD card slots can be configured to overflow or backup, which is a professional feature I value highly in critical shoots.
The W60’s smaller form factor yields less impressively documented battery life - although portable and easy to replace - and only a single SD/SDHC slot. Internal memory is minimal, so you’ll want an SD card for any serious shooting.
Video Capabilities: From Cinematic to Casual Clips
If video is a factor, the 645Z captures Full HD 1920 x 1080 video at up to 60i fps in MPEG-4/H.264, with external microphone input but no headphone jack. It lacks 4K video, which is a limitation for modern videographers. I found footage sharp and color-rich, but somewhat basic compared to full video-specialist cameras.
The W60 offers 1280 x 720p video capped at 15 fps, which is “snapshot” quality at best and only suitable for quick casual clips.
Performance In Photography Genres: Real-World Use
Let’s break down how the two cameras handle different types of photography. (Refer to the comprehensive genre analysis below for detailed scores.)
Portrait Photography
The 645Z delivers exquisitely smooth skin tones and creamy bokeh due to its large sensor and medium format lenses. Eye autofocus is not present, but face detection helps. The W60’s smaller sensor and lens limitations yield less subtle background separation and more noise in low light.
Landscape
With a whopping 51 MP sensor offering wide dynamic range and exceptional shadow recovery, the 645Z is an ace landscape tool. Its weather sealing and freeze-proof body invite shooting in harsh environments. The W60 is fine for casual daylight landscapes but falls short in shadow detail and clarity.
Wildlife & Sports
The 645Z’s autofocus and modest burst speed make it useful mainly for slow-action wildlife like birds at rest, studio portraiture, or controlled sports shooting, not fast bursts. The W60 is simply too limited here.
Street Photography
While the 645Z’s size limits discretion and spontaneous shooting, its image quality is superb. The W60’s compact size and quick pocketability make it a better street companion, albeit with lower quality images.
Macro
645Z’s precision focusing and compatible macro lenses enable high-detail close-ups. The W60 offers a 1cm macro focus, which is nice for casual flower or bug shots but lacks the sharpness professionals need.
Night and Astro Photography
The 645Z’s large sensor, high native ISO, and long exposure capability excel here. No IBIS means a tripod is key. The W60’s noise at high ISO and short exposures limit astrophotography use.
Video Work
Full HD video on the 645Z is solid but not cutting-edge. The W60 is casual and limited.
Travel
The W60’s small size and weather resistance make it ideal for light travel. The 645Z, heavy and bulky, is suited for planned photographic projects, not lightweight globetrotting.
Professional Use
If you’re a pro demanding RAW files, extensive lens options, weather robustness, dual cards, and superior image quality, the 645Z is the clear choice.
Here you can see real-world samples side-by-side, showcasing the detail and tonal range differences that the sensor size and lens quality bring to different shooting conditions.
User Interface and Connectivity: Ease of Use and Workflows
The 645Z’s interface offers rich customizability, physical dials, and a bright tilting screen that eases manual shooting and tripod use. USB 3.0 speeds up file transfer, and HDMI outputs support tethered shooting. However, the lack of built-in wireless connectivity is a drawback in today’s mobile workflow era.
The W60 offers no wireless options and a basic USB 2.0 port for data transfer. Menu navigation is simple but limited by screen resolution and button layout.
Price-to-Performance: What Are You Really Paying For?
The most obvious difference is cost:
- Pentax 645Z: Approx. $5,000
- Pentax Optio W60: Around $300
That’s an enormous gap, valid given the 645Z’s professional-grade sensor, build, and features. Yet I often see photographers hesitate at the medium format price point without fully understanding the quality jump it offers.
If your needs demand ultimate image quality, detail, and reliability for professional work, the investment pays off handsomely. If you want a casual camera that takes decent pictures and goes anywhere, the W60 makes more sense.
This chart summarizes key category scores. Notice the 645Z dominating in image quality, build, and professional features, while the W60 performs adequately as a simple stepping stone into photography.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Choose Which Camera?
If you’re reading this article, you’re likely aware the two cameras live in different leagues. Yet both can delight in their arenas.
-
Choose the Pentax 645Z if you:
- Demand extraordinary image quality and resolution for portraits, landscapes, or commercial uses
- Value robust build quality and environmental sealing to shoot anywhere
- Appreciate manual focus options, extensive lens availability, and pro workflows
- Are a professional or serious enthusiast willing to invest in medium format mastery
-
Opt for the Pentax Optio W60 if you:
- Want a pocketable, durable point-and-shoot that survives casual outdoor adventures
- Need simple, straightforward shooting with no fuss or heavy gear
- Mostly shoot in daylight or for social memories without post-processing
- Have a budget under $500 and prioritize portability over ultimate image quality
In Closing: Experience Matters
Having spent months using and testing the 645Z in demanding environments - shooting everything from portraits to landscapes - the confidence gained from its reliability and image quality is profound. Conversely, I remember enjoying the carefree, splash-and-go nature of the W60 for family outings and hikes, where ease was paramount.
Neither camera is perfect for every scenario, but each excels if matched well to your photography goals. I hope this thorough comparison helps you find the camera that fits your vision and shooting style best.
Happy shooting!
If you want more visual comparisons and test methodologies, see my detailed video review series linked above. Feel free to ask questions or share your experiences in the comments below - let’s keep the conversation going!
Pentax 645Z vs Pentax W60 Specifications
Pentax 645Z | Pentax Optio W60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Pentax |
Model type | Pentax 645Z | Pentax Optio W60 |
Type | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-04-15 | 2009-07-01 |
Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | PRIME III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8256 x 6192 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 204800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 27 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Pentax 645AF2 | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 6 | - |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.2 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.85x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync | Auto, On, Off, Soft, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/125s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) | 1280 x 720, 15fps, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 30/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 1550g (3.42 pounds) | 165g (0.36 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") | 98 x 56 x 25mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 101 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI90 | D-LI78 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Cost at launch | $5,024 | $300 |